is this the kind of thing we will never hear about anymore, or is it legit?
this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
334 points (98.3% liked)
News
23059 readers
4086 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
"could wipe the disease out"
..."but won't, because thanks to Capitalism it will be non-affordable."
This is great news. Yet, sadly, I am drawn to wondering who will complain about this the loudest. Will it be misogynists who say "they're not helping men with their cancer", or anti-vaxxers saying "this vaccine will actually CAUSE cancer"?
What about people who are both misogynist and anti-vaccine?
Well at least ovarian cancer isn’t airborne and contagious like covid. So antivaxxers can avoid it all they want, it’s their choice if they want to die from a disease that they could’ve prevented.
Fuck em, essentially. Rather have cancer than a vaccine, that's their choice. It's not until it's a required vaccine that it makes much difference.
What about people who are both misogynist and anti-vaccine?
$10 says Alex Jones and his troglodyte cult following are gonna have a field day 😮💨
Alex is a little busy losing everything he owns right now.
He'll multitask
Sure. He'll also drink large quantities of liquor and cry.
Absolutely.
They don't get a vaccine. More for the sane people.
Yeah, I knew it. Here come the sad sacks with the useless "this is good news, but......"
I'm an academic working to analyse hate speech, with a particular focus on online misogyny. As bigotry is illogical, common features of communications of that hatred is stuff that is wholly made up. This include the idea that men are being short-changed by a medical industry which prioritise female health. This is factually untrue, in terms of gender differences in health outcomes.
If knowing about the truth makes me a 'sad sack', fine. Maybe being correct and 'sad' is more important than being incorrect yet happy.
Ok, good point. Yet, sadly, children die of cancer.
And, sadly, sometimes parents refuse the vaccine that would help.
Good point. Yet, sadly, puppies sometimes get cancer.
It’s a good thing we invented this straw person to have this whole discussion artificially when literally no one else was bringing it up. If we can’t find any monsters I guess we’ll invent them and do it anyway. 🙄
Oh you sweet summer child. I wish I could live in your brain.
They undoubtedly exist, but we shouldn't worry about what some troglodytic moron has to say about the issue.
It’s a good thing we invented this straw person
So, neither misogynists nor anti-vaxxers exist?
I can find you evidence of men complaining about free period products. I am certain there will be men complaining that female cancers are getting cures, and not male ones.
They exist, are they here on Lemmy without artificially or “ironically” sharing their awesome hot takes? The world will never know.
Let's fucking goooo! People are just so clever. This is amazing.
While the "full-blown timeline" for the vaccine being approved "might be many years away" the visible impact could be sooner.
Professor Ahmed added that, through clinical trials, he would hope to start seeing the vaccine's impact "in four or five years on the healthy population".
This is really exciting. I wonder if vaccines could be developed for other cancers using a similar technique?
They will establish which proteins on the surface of early-stage ovarian cancer cells are best recognised by the immune system and how effectively the vaccine kills models of the disease in a lab.
Sounds like it would to me. Between this and mRNA vaccines, there's a lot of promise out there.
mRNA research exploded during the pandemic. Several cancer vaccines for various cancers are being developed right now!!!
The billions that got pumped into vaxine research... The RNA method is going to or has received a nobel prize right? Before this we had no good way (or as safe) to pre-train the immune system to "if you see this (virus, etc.) again, raise the alarms". Now we do.
Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman won the 2023 Nobel Prize in Medicine for their work on RNA leading to the COVID-19 vaccines (from Moderna and Pfizer)
This is some pretty cool research but I already can't wait to see the 100k per vaccine price in the USA lmao.
Anti-vaxxers: hold my beer.
Well, this is cancer and not some virus so at least they'll only slowly kill themselves after suffering, if they were to have to deal with this. It's not great, but silver linings, I guess?
They're calling it a vaccine. We all know what anti-vaxxers will do when they hear the words vaccines.
It actually completely reverses the dynamic. Anti-vaxxers are bioterrorists because most stuff you vaccinate against is contagious. It's assaulting a public health superstructure that everybody relies on.
But when they only kill themselves? 🍺🍺
Only leftover awful thing is doing it to their poor kids. Still every bit as evil, just with a massive reduction in scope.
Far, far more than a silver lining.
i know it's a pipe dream but if i live to see the eradication of cancer i will truly die happy
Aaaannnd it’s gone
Yes, and probably destroy your uterus.