this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
293 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

58451 readers
5524 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 167 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (6 children)

It's time to stop taking any CEO at their word.

Edit: scratch that, the time to stop taking any CEO at their word was 100 years ago.

[–] GrabtharsHammer@lemmy.world 80 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

The best time was 100 years ago. The second-best time is now.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 22 points 4 hours ago
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 16 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

We should never have taken them at their word.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

We should be taking them with the rope...

[–] tinyVoltron@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

We should take CEOs with fava beans and a nice bottle of chianti.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 1 hour ago

ehh as much as everybody loves this sentiment... at the end of the day, those days are over. going that route, you get Syria type shit.

violence at this point is a red herring. there are ways to engage tho but it requires people to take personal responsibility improve their lives and show solidarity with like minded people and the under class. if critical mass ever hits this, things can change.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

It's time to take CEO's money away!

[–] Blackout@fedia.io 2 points 4 hours ago

The easiest way to stop him is to walk up to him and whisper into his ear "end computer similation" and he will just disappear.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 minutes ago

The word it's time to take the CEOs away

[–] _bcron@lemmy.world 88 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

he declares that the AI revolution is on the verge of unleashing boundless prosperity and radically improving human life

I think he means productivity will go up 240% and we'll get 8% raises to match, but we'll spend all of it getting nickel-and-dimed on 'premium human concierge' services whenever we get stuck talking in circles with support chatbots. This is the bad place. I bet in 10 years my insurance plan will no longer cover imaging being interpereted by a radiologist

[–] multi_regime_enjoyer@lemmy.ml 20 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

I bet in 10 years my insurance plan will no longer cover imaging being interpereted by a radiologist.

That's a very sharp prediction, thanks. I will run that by some people.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Considering how fractured medical billing is these days, often the techs contracted by your in-network doctors office are actually out-of-network.

Isn't medical billing fun?

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 2 points 57 minutes ago

Surprise Medical Billing has mostly been nerfed after the No Surprises Act here in the US. After 2022, so long as you went to an INN provider, then you can't be charged OON pricing for any OON services that you may have encountered during that visit.

Source: https://www.health.state.mn.us/facilities/insurance/managedcare/faq/nosurprisesact.html

Also, I work in insurance as a software engineer

[–] multi_regime_enjoyer@lemmy.ml 1 points 32 minutes ago

The way claims get sent back during billing I became suspicious a lot of them are getting read by machine (and very poorly) during the first round of mail so don't worry medical billing will get even more fun thanks to AI

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

Yeah this might actually not be that far from reality. Computer vision already did a large amount of the lifting, with the massive pushes towards AI, AI will take the rest of us plebians healthcare.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 67 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

He is a tech bro. Almost everything he is saying is a lie.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 22 points 4 hours ago

*parasite....

Nothing bro about this shit stain..

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

*"Podcast-bro"

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago

Almost everything tech bros say is to boost short term share prices. Any resemblance to the truth is coincidental.

[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 49 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I never took him at his word.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Seriously, what dipshit is going, “hmm well now he’s gone too far!”

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago

How do we not know that this isn't an AI generated Sam Altman?

[–] Soup@lemmy.cafe 51 points 3 hours ago

Yeah. It sucks I had to be downvoted into irrelevance way back when this clown was first becoming worshipped by the tech bros.

I don’t take pride in patting myself on the back, but I was fucking right all along about this douche.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 4 hours ago

Was this not obvious at the very least when his own board kicked him to the curb due to an inability to trust him?

[–] droopy4096@lemmy.ca 30 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

not only does he burn through cash, he burns through resources making life worse now for everybody: AI rivals crypto in resource waisting while not contributing at all to any improvements. I fail to see "brighter future" for us through AI as it is energy-intensive, unsustainable endeavor for which we are woefully unprepared both materially (energy efficiency, semiconductor manufacturing/recycling, etc) and psychologically (ethics etc.). Yeah, grand on paper, terrible in reality

[–] tiny@midwest.social -2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

AI is worse than crypto. Most crypto projects use proof of stake which is way more resource efficient than mining. Also the mining that does happen usually happens where there is excess generation instead of azure datacenters

[–] droopy4096@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 hours ago

some crypto learned to be efficient, others did not. We still do have crypto-mining botnets. Crypto remains to be useless to humanity and very profitable for few. Same with AI. Same with stock market. Instead of producing something of value we keep on burning through resources while selected few enjoy bonfire others have to fight to stay alive...

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

What is really annoying is that there are a lot of really good data modeling applications, they are just in research areas. Generative AI is absolutely a waste of resources, but a ton of money and energy is spent on that instead of on the applications that are actually bearing fruit.

[–] kinsnik@lemmy.world 15 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

the techbros that think that with sufficiently advanced AI we could solve climate change are so stupid. like, we might not have a perfect solution, but we have ideas on how to start to make things better (less car-centric cities, less meat and animal products, more investment in public transport and solar), and it gets absolutely ignored. why would it be different when an AI gives the solution? unless they want the "eat fat-free food and you will be thin" solution to climate change, in which we change absolutely nothing of our current situation but it is magically ecological

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 2 points 2 hours ago

There was a (fiction) book I was called "all the birds in the sky". I really liked it. Highly recommend.

One of the plot threads is a rich tech bro character that's like "the world is doomed we need to abandon it for somewhere else. Better pour tons of resources into this sci-fi sounding project". And I'm just screaming at the book "use that money for housing and transport and clean energy you absolute donkey".

There are a lot of well understood things we could be doing to make the world better, but they're difficult for idiotic political reasons. Racism, nimbyism, emotional immaturity, etc.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't think you're imagining the same thing they are when you hear the word "AI". They're not imagining a computer that prints out a new idea that is about as good as the ideas that humans have come up with. Even that would be amazing (it would mean that a computer could do science and engineering about as well as a human) but they're imagining a computer that's better than any human. Better at everything. It would be the end of the world as we know it, and perhaps the start of something much better. In any case, climate change wouldn't be our problem anymore.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

That's the thing, there could be a human 10'000x smarter than Einstein telling us what to do... And it would still not happen.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works -2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

I disagree with you, because a modern human could offer the people of the distant past (with their far less advanced technology) solutions to their problems which would seem miraculous to them. Things that they thought were impossible would be easy for the modern human. The computer may do the same for us, with a solution to climate change that would be, as you put it, magically ecological.

With that said, the computer wouldn't be giving humans suggestions. It would be the one in charge. Imagine a group of chimpanzees that somehow create a modern human. (Not a naked guy with nothing, but rather someone with all the knowledge we have now.) That human isn't going to limit himself to answering questions for very long. This isn't a perfect analogy because chimpanzees don't comprehend language, but if a human with a brain just 3.5 times the size of a chimpanzee's can do so much more than a chimpanzee, a computer with calculational capability orders of magnitude greater than a human's could be a god compared to us. (The critical thing is to make it a loving god; humans haven't been good to chimpanzees.)

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 4 points 3 hours ago

Imagine Jesus Christ as a time traveler, going back from a dying planet to just about the dawn of both roads and also safer sea travel than previously, those two connecting what would become the entire modern world.

Jesus: like, forget all this "religion" crap about what foods to eat & where & when & with who, and like, just be excellent to one another dudes & dudettes

Everyone since then, especially those who borrow His actual fucking name to label themselves: um... how about "no"?

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 hours ago

$ GPT how do we solve climate change?

GPT: command not found

$ cd /home/chatgpt

cd: command not found

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 13 points 4 hours ago

I wonder what this clowns daily PR budget is?

Each one of these fake news stories are generally 15k a pop

Do you remember when crypto scammer Sam Bankman was running thousands daily for years...

Similar vibes here

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 12 points 5 hours ago

People did that? Lol

[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago

He’s the musk in making

[–] sartalon@lemmy.world 4 points 14 minutes ago

When that major drama unfolded with him getting booted then re-hired. It was super fucking obvious that it was all about the money, the data, and the salesmanship He is nothing but a fucking tech-bro. Part Theranos, part Musk, part SBF, part (whatever that pharma asshat was), and all fucking douchebag.

AI is fucking snake oil and an excuse to scrape every bit of data like it's collecting every skin cell dropping off of you.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Who is Sam Altman?

(This is a rethorical question)

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

He is the cousin of Sam Mainman, who is an actual human being.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 2 points 4 hours ago

And also the cousin of Sam Neuman. Another con artist, but this one relying on novel techniques.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Don't forget the lesser known Sam Shiftman and Sam Ctrlman.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I'm just glad Sam Delman is in jail for killing those processes.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

The best time to stop taking Altman seriously was ten years ago.

The second best time is now.