this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
472 points (97.4% liked)

Memes

45264 readers
3342 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 2 points 15 minutes ago

in the US we call that 9th grade

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 1 points 45 minutes ago

That's how you keep practice

[–] MigratingApe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 hours ago
[–] ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works 14 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)
[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 29 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

Everyone in Europe killing each other every generation predates capitalism. Capitalism did increase the scale though; after the fall of the western roman empire, we didn't see armies of that size until Napoleon managed to draft a million men in a country of 30 million.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 19 points 11 hours ago

Perhaps you would prefer "the ruling class"?

[–] ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Lmfao, sorry (not sorry), I should have included feudalists too I guess, to avoid bootlicking pedants.. 🙄

The point stands - war is waged for profit by profiteers, not by random civilians trying to live their lives, always was, always will be.

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

One exception to it : fascists managed to convince people who can only lose stuff to a war that it's good for them too.

[–] ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 hours ago

One exception to it : ~~fascists~~ capitalists managed to convince people who can only lose stuff to a war that it’s good for them too.

Fascism is capitalism in decay, there is no exception.

[–] bi_tux@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

don't worry, the soviets joined ww2 as well

[–] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

If by "joined WW2", do you mean "got refused from any military alliances with England, France and Poland despite a decade of trying in an attempt to unify Europe against Hitler"? Or do you mean "getting invaded by the Nazis and losing 25+mn people in the process of eliminating Nazism from Europe"?

[–] kattfisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 45 minutes ago (1 children)

You missed the part in between where they made a deal with the nazis and invaded eastern Europe

[–] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 2 points 12 minutes ago* (last edited 11 minutes ago)

You missed the part in between where they made a deal with the nazis

I didn't miss that part because there was no "deal with Nazis". Nothing as bad as the Munich Agreement signed the previous year by England, France and Germany among others, allowing Hitler to occupy the Sudetenland, a land with more than 3mn people in Czechoslovakia (to whom the Soviet Union offered assistance but Romania and Poland denied pass to Soviet troops, possibly influenced by the fact that Poland also did a grab of land of Czechoslovakia). The USSR spent the entire 30s trying to push for a military alliance with England, France and Poland to stop Nazism, but they all refused because a good liberal would rather have Nazis first exterminate communists. Stalin went as far as offering to station 1 million troops, together with aviation and artillery, in France, in case Stalin invaded, to which England and France refused. Feel free to study the so-called "collective security policy" pushed by the USSR in Europe against Nazism.

The Soviet Union had been in a civil war until 1921 (right after a devastating WW1/, and before that it was a preindustrial nation. It had a whopping 19 years to rebuild the country from scratch and to industrialise, compared to the 100+ years of German industrialization. They desperately needed every single year of industrialization they could get in order to gain some advantage against the industrially superior Nazis, as evidenced by the 25+ million casualties the USSR suffered against the Nazis despite material help from the US. Making an agreement to postpone the war after every country in Europe refuses to enter a military alliance against Nazis just because you're a communist country, is just the logical action to defend your citizens.

Please stop pushing revisionist nazi propaganda. Without the USSR, the slavic population of Europe, including Polish, Ukrainian, Belarusian and Russian, as well as many other ethnic groups, would have been genocided in vastly superior numbers than they were.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

He already said capitalists, state capitalism is still capitalism, no matter if you call it communism.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Calling something state capitalist when capitalism heavily relies on the state by default shows you need to hit the books on how capitalism actually functions.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

Calling something state capitalist when capitalism heavily relies on the state by default

I have no idea what you are trying to say with this, but perhaps you should look things up before pompously trying to diss people.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_capitalism

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 minutes ago

Perhaps you should read theory. The USSR was State Capitalist with respect to the NEP, but was Socialist for its entire existence

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 hour ago
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 minutes ago

The USSR was Socialist, what on Earth are you talking about?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 minutes ago

Yep, and beat the Nazis.

[–] I_Clean_Here@lemmy.world 68 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

This period of peace in Western Europe is pretty special and I would like to keep it that way, thx

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 30 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

This period of war in Eastern Europe is pretty shit and I would like Western Europe to take it more seriously, thx

[–] kattfisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 43 minutes ago

So you're saying we should invade Poland?

[–] Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 21 minutes ago

By recognizing it's not winnable without full-scale NATO mobilization and therefore we should stop sabotaging peace talks and just get a deal done so we can stop throwing Ukranian men into the meat grinder?

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 13 points 3 hours ago

That's because the EU was created with the purpose of making an interconnected market where going to war is simply way too costly.

As the other commenter said, there is a war in Europe though.

[–] SGGeorwell@lemmy.world 42 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 7 points 6 hours ago

Yes, we have decades between (direct involvement in) wars!!
We didn't even spend actual money on war stuff the last few decades.

But we sure are gonna do it now, we need to protect our drinking water (for the coming water wars) and update our firewalls (for the coming Skynet wars).

[–] ignotum@lemmy.world 36 points 8 hours ago

American students every couple weeks