this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
490 points (99.4% liked)

politics

18930 readers
5279 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump the period checker and chief.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Probably likes to think of himself as more of the period ender

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 122 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's in keeping with the conservative idea of small government, and minimal interference in personal freedoms.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago

shifted away from being more anarchistic in nature to authoritarian. its going to see the split between libertarians (who are more anarchistic) and religious fundamentalists (who are more authoritarian)

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, ovum are very small so this fits within the bounds of "small government" because we're governing small things. Why? What did you think we meant by the "small government" phrase we've been saying all of these years? -Conservatives probably

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“I want a government small enough to fit up your ass.”- Vance probably.

“So your for gay rights?”

“Wait… what?”

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"I want a government small enough to fit my micropenis in" - JD couch fucker Vance

Source: me

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I realize you’re joking, but he doesn’t have a micro-penis. He bought a very big one from fleshlight .

[–] beansbeansbeans@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

The brain trust should streamline ejaculation surveillance programs instead. Ejaculation without a pregnancy? Right to jail. Right away.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

FORCING your Daughter to tell the Government when she Bleeds from her Vagina is NOT WEIRD SMALL GOVERNMENT! DRAG QUEENS need to be ROUND UP and Jailed!

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago

ROUND UP

It's the little touches like that which make your comments so good

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (6 children)

It's almost like they're trying to lose this election. What next? Virginity inspections?

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't think you understand how many oppressive shitty people are in this country. The Taliban are alive and well here in America.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf of the Southern policies of Jim Crow as an inspiration for Germany's genetic policies.

We needed to finish reconstruction, instead we let the filth slime back into power.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I do, I just don't think they're the majority.

[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

Thanks to the electoral college, they don't need to be a majority to get a Trump presidency.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Nah, it’s more like when you have a hammer, everything is a nail.

Conservatives only have one play, it’s to just keep going more right (as in, privatize things more and more to keep “fixing” things).

They have already gone after abortion.

What’s that? Fertility rate is low? We just got to try harder!

[–] Volkditty@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Genuinely surprised they haven't called for jus primae noctis yet.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sounds foreign, they won't like that.

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

They don’t speak French

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Please, they'd all offer their wives and daughters willingly.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 day ago

Nah, this is due to their base's support being absolutely unwavering. This is a level of propagandistic control never before seen in the United States. Joseph Goebbels would fucking blush.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Early menopause? Nah, we think you have had 4 abortions this year. Prove you didn't or go to prison."

I guess we shouldn't expect better from the party of bad female anatomy, sex education repression, and couch fucking. Weirdos.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The party that believes that a successful pregnancy is proof that women weren't legitimately raped

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 5 points 23 hours ago

Todd Akin, Missouri’s Republican Senate candidate, sparked controversy with a claim, made in a TV interview posted Sunday, that victims of “legitimate rape” very rarely get pregnant because their bodies prevent them from doing so.

Speaking to Charles Jaco on the Jaco Report on St. Louis’s Fox station, Akin was answering a question about allowing abortions in the case of rape. He said, “If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.”

https://www.politico.com/story/2012/08/akin-legitimate-rape-victims-dont-get-pregnant-079864

Todd Akin did apologize and then decided to make it worse.

In July 2014, WND Books published Akin's book, Firing Back: Taking on the Party Bosses and Media Elite to Protect Our Faith and Freedom. In it, he said that he regretted apologizing, because "by asking the public at large for forgiveness, I was validating the willful misinterpretation of what I had said." He also defended his original comments and attacked various Republicans for "wronging" him...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Todd_Akin#Aftermath

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago

This is gross and weird, and I can't understand the psychology that goes on inside of people who are so lacking and self-awareness and are this messed up in the head.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Menstrual Surveillance Programs.

Menstrual Surveillance Programs!

Menstrual Surveillance Programs!!!

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AtomicHotSauce@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ok. Were there. We’re at THAT point in this shitty timeline. We need to start clearing our calendars for the next few years. Where’s everybody meeting?

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right under the Tree Of Liberty.

[–] Big_Boss_77@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I've got my tricorne hat on and everything.

[–] nifty@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago

It’s like they’re using an abusive spouse handbook to make policies lmao

[–] nemonic187@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

Well of course those perverts are ok with this.

[–] PedroMaldonado@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

They're working towards making that a mandatory policy too

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 22 points 23 hours ago

Damn that's a pretty weird small government stance to want to constantly sniff out menstrual blood

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump: anyone who can grab a pussy can be a pussy inspector.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

His reforms of the FBI will be very thorough, they will finally take their original role as Female Body Inspectors.

[–] ceiphas@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Under his eye" feelings intesify

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grasshopper_mouse@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Guess I'll end up in jail or dead then because ain’t no way I'll participate in bullshit like this.

At what point do we start Civil War II? Where can I sign up?

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or people can stop voting these prices of human shit into office.

[–] grasshopper_mouse@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Sadly, America has proven that it is full of dumb-dumbs and there will always be people who will vote pieces of shit into office.

[–] match@pawb.social 6 points 1 day ago

i don't know if the red states would object to the blue states seceding or vice versa, so instead we'd be looking at american interventionism 3: this time it's personal

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

They are out of their minds

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

I don't know if I trust this program. Let's first test it by surveiling how frequently men are unsuccessful in creating a baby. /s

As proud as I am of my 100% failure rate, I'd likely feel uncomfortable with something tracking where, when, and with whom (or more often, what) I'm tricking my body into believing it's attempting to pass on genetic code.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

wtf? Is T.I. making policy for these fucking weirdos?

load more comments
view more: next ›