this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
538 points (98.9% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6625 readers
1071 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 144 points 3 months ago (5 children)

"State-sanctioned GF"

But then how will they ever get recruits for the Navy?

[–] nuke@sh.itjust.works 129 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] lud@lemm.ee 34 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Jokes on them, I'm on land.

[–] Bruhh@lemmy.world 46 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] lud@lemm.ee 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well, I'm inside a house. Good luck hitting me!

[–] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

Captain, we're going to need a new tactic. Operative 15 has found a gaping flaw in our capabilities.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

Shipmate you gotta study more recce

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 81 points 3 months ago (1 children)

State-sanctioned cat-boys.

[–] GluWu@lemm.ee 17 points 3 months ago

Morale liaison

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 27 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Girlfriend is for on land only.

[–] EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

either the navy becomes full of lesbians or they'll hand out state bf

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Recruits don't have to start gay.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world 52 points 3 months ago (4 children)

time to hodl untill state gf

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (11 children)

Yeah, that's actually the least dumb one after a stable job. Everyone wants money, status and love. Even pride in your nation can be cringe, depending on how justified that pride actually is.

Of course, women are not objects, so I'm unclear how they would pull handing them out off... It's going to be a robot RealDoll thing, isn't it?

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They could probably get girls signing up if they posted ads saying that they're looking for stay at home girlfriends/boipussy for servicemen. Lots of states with no easy way to escape have desperate people unfortunately.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but you can already dependa without government help. I guess just a sugardaddy-style dating site run by the DoD, then?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Free healthcare and commissary access already causes marriages. A defined length contract wouldn't be the worst thing in human history. But I'm not sure it's up to modern ethical standards.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you can't leave early, yeah it wouldn't be. If you can I don't really see what that adds.

Arguably legal marriages that are hard and expensive to leave are anachronistic themselves.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Even pride in your nation can be cringe, depending on how justified that pride actually is.

As a German who was raised long after WW2 let me just say that pretty much all pride in your nation is pretty cringe, no matter how justified. The one exception would be maybe if you had a major part in improving your nation personally.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago

They already do that, but the gf's name is always Jody. Who do you think writes all those Dear John letters?

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Which state though? I hope North Dakota, those cold weather women love to cuddle

Idk, wojak ads sound pretty appealing.

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 39 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 31 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (9 children)

Been done, and didn’t work. Players complained of “Slow weapon upgrades” and “No character progression” and was received poorly, needs more gritty realism.

Or explosions

[–] domdanial@reddthat.com 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

What's funny is I know someone with like, 2000 hours in that game. And it just happened to be his favorite fps, nothing to do with the army propaganda.

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It’s honestly a solid lane shooter FPS, but it falls flat of the Battlefield killer it could have been. Enough realism and no respawns to make you treat it seriously, but it’s also not ArmA levels of “welp, time to respawn and drive/walk to the objective for 15 minutes”

Plus doing the training unlocks the squad role slots for online play, get that season pass shit outta my face

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

It's well balanced, has great level design, and the game mood is serious enough that the scenarios and matches are taken serious too. It's rare to have someone run in guns blazing for more than a couple matches. Overall, it has a fun gameplay loop that takes itself seriously without being over the top. They know it's a recruiting tool, so it has to be good enough that folks want to play.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

AA2 and AA3 were fucking fantastic, despite AA3 becoming early access abandonware within like ten seconds of its release. AA4 was awful.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I heard they had to limit people at West Point from playing as all the cadets were learning to shoot first and ask questions later.

[–] quinkin@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

From my experience trying it out they should have made sure no-one had any grenades.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

They made the most realistic game and people complained it wasn't real enough. I will never forget that. And the slow weapon upgrades was because there weren't any originally. Then you had to complete a stealth mission with one possible path that you had to crawl through for an hour. And the weapons weren't available on every map.

In many ways the game proved we didn't want super realism. We wanted fake realism with tactical fashion.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Think it belongs before or after the Dodge Charger?

[–] Hathaway@lemmy.zip 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Before. America’s Army dropped for the PC in ‘02. I feel like grunts were getting chargers from like 06-current. Could be wrong though

[–] TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 35 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Dodge charger

clearly not a dodge charger

Is this subtext meme or is NCD just extra not credible today?

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's not a Dodge Charger? Is it a Dodge, though? I'm not good on my car politics

[–] TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago

It is the similarly named but starkly different 'dodge challenger'

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

Cars aren't really our strong point, just look at all the "Toyota Hilux" memes, where the vehicle is actually a 70 series cruiser.

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 31 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] StopJoiningWars@discuss.online 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you know what model that is you're too painfully American to come back from there, my condolences.

[–] 3ntranced@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

To be fair if you've seen a charger and a challenger before, you'd be able to tell pretty quick. My brain interprets it is charger built like matchbox; challenger like hot wheels.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] coffee_with_cream@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What is the ratio of GF per recruit? I propose 1 GF to 10 recruits for optimal taxpayer expenditure.

Also no condoms

Sloppy 9ths pls

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 6 points 3 months ago

...they're called dependapotamuses and they're already a thing...

[–] coffee_with_cream@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

State sponsored big titty goth GFs for all

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe I'll be able to get a commission. 🤔

1 sloppy BJ per recruit

[–] tilefan@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

make it $250k and I'll sign up

$25.0k? You got it!

[–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago

"STD Treatment/Health Care" should be between Egirl and Wojak. Just sayin.

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

This is the first meme i laughed aloud at in a couple days--well played, op

load more comments
view more: next ›