ironhydroxide

If I were in your shoes I'd sit down with the son and ask what he'd like, and try and explain why I'm uncomfortable being around his mother and her new fling. Then in the conversation figure out if his desire is greater than my hesitations, come to an understanding on what we feel the vacation would look like.

Would it be all 4 just.... Hanging out? Then probably not. That's the most awkward. Or would it be that there are things to do (planned) that could pair off and have some time with son, while his mother and fling does whatever they do? As long as those times are more frequent, and son likes the idea, sure I'd probably accept.

Woohoo $0.50/person in the USA, to fuck them all.

More like wasting space and time. GTFO the way.

You want to sit and chat with someone, go to where there is space to sit and chat instead of inconveniencing everyone.

You see, Louis and their Nana are the judges.

To these types legal=moral. So all they have to do to be morally justified in doing something, is to make it legal.

And I'm pointing out that the rich aren't actually moving money to anyone but themselves. So yes, the (rich) investors ARE hurting the economy for their own gain.

The fuck you think investors do at all? What value do they create? They definitely don't pay my wages from their own "investment". My wages are paid from the profits created by myself and coworkers working to create, market, sell, distribute the product. Soon as those profits don't hit targets investors will absolutely vote to downsize or shutter entirely, not "invest" and continue paying wages.

Work? Like "buying" yet another company? Or stock buybacks?

Opposite. Look at the notes at the top of the graphs

If only enthusiasm countered the unjustness of voter suppression and the electoral college.

I get it's needed for the joke to land, but who showers fully clothed?

You know what comes before permanent hardship? "Temporary" hardship.