this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
553 points (99.1% liked)

World News

32302 readers
1102 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 116 points 1 year ago (4 children)

For people not reading the article, Twitter was facing a class action lawsuit, but they successfully sued to force employees to go through arbitration, which avoids a class action suit. Only problem is that arbitration rules say the employee has to pay a small fee for filing, but the company has to pay the arbitration costs. Twitter filed to force the costs to be split with the employee, but the organization that overseas arbitration said that's against their rules and has refused to engage in any arbitration activities that Twitter isn't paying for. The pricetag could be millions, and Twitter is simply not paying, so now the employees are suing to force Twitter to pay.

[–] Tentaclius@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How forced an arbitration even legal. I don't get it.

[–] KingKRool@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

It is not legal for employees alleging sexual assault or harassment. Because Congress passed a law making that illegal. Also, it is not legal for baggage handlers, because the Supreme Court said there's an exemption for working in interstate commerce. IIRC Congress tried to ban it across the board last year, but it died in the Senate and then the House flipped so there won't be another chance for a few years at least.

[–] Poob@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago
[–] bappity@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

thank you 🙏
I wish there was a TLDR bot on Lemmy

[–] mjhagen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I’ve seen one around some places, don’t remember where though.

[–] beeng@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I would rather keep this place bot free

[–] mark@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

Makes sense to me

[–] Nothus@infosec.pub 92 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

If this is how Muskrat runs his tiny operations on Earth, what kind of tyrant would he become as the ruler of another planet?

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The second you're unprofitable, he's kicking you out the airlock. Guaranteed.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We really are moving towards a Cyberpunk future, aren't we.

This is like one of the oldest sci-fi tropes to exist.

[–] SpaghettiYeti@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Wasn't that type of indentured servitude referenced in The Expanse?

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 4 points 1 year ago

Bring your best code to airlock 3.

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who's gonna hop into that spaceship with him? 😆

[–] Nothus@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd do it... if it was just me and him. ;)

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Eventually the food runs out... 😬

[–] Nothus@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago

Worth it just to see the look on his face.

[–] Misanthrope@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago

It's nice to see labor fighting back. Especially against odds stacked against them.

[–] Yoz@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

No surprise there. That's how rich stays rich

[–] Yeah2206@infosec.pub 9 points 1 year ago

It's like, he doesn't know whether or not it's going to work, so delays paying anybody (except obviously the lawyers) as long as possible. When it really doesn't work out, nobody gets paid. If it somewhat works out, he negotiates the payment down. Do you want it, or do you want more delay?

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 8 points 1 year ago

That's exactly how you get wealthy. Screw anyone you can, threaten them with eternal lawsuits, and you can get a huge discount on labour and other costs. Trump was famous for pulling the same shit.

[–] ProfessorScience@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I'm a little surprised that Twitter can just refuse to come to the table without simply losing by default. But I suppose they wrote the terms of the arbitration agreement, so... not that surprised.

[–] Skaryon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago
[–] lanolinoil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Totally drinking the Gospel of Wealth Kool aid. You grind as much money as possible doing evil shit and then give a bunch of money away when you're old so people remember you well and you get to direct the world through philanthropy. Carnegie 101

[–] jcg@halubilo.social 3 points 1 year ago

It's not even just accumulating and giving that money away due to conscience. Nobody with a conscience could do what it takes to accumulated that large sum of wealth in the first place. You have to stomp on people and actively hurt the people around you.

load more comments
view more: next ›