dingus

joined 4 years ago
[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 months ago

Joe Pera

Todd Barry

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Good idea, link the community and post here, too, thanks.

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (8 children)

I think you may have to start a new community for this, I'm genuinely not sure where a story like this might go. Excellent, though.

The "Casual conservation" community is probably too casual for this. Maybe creating something like /c/WildPersonalStories ?

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 11 points 8 months ago (3 children)
[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago

Look man, if your options are literally only "do nothing and accept your fate" or "kill a bunch of innocent people who never did anything to you and actually may have supported you" then maybe you should just give up and accept your fate, because we're literally seeing how many more innocents are dying because of this. They didn't put a dent in Israel's defenses. They gave Israel more excuses to the international community to murder even more innocents. Great plan, Hamas. I'm glad it worked out so swimmingly and actually changed things instead of just continuing the same bullshit cycle. /s

If you can point to me out how this is going to result in anything other than more death and destruction, feel free to clue me in. Because fuck nothing has changed. They didn't take out the people responsible. They didn't change the power balance, and now even more Palestinians are paying the price because Israel is a fucked up aggressor.

Acting like a bad plan that resulted in more innocents deaths is some great blow against the establishment is dumb as fuck.

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Agreed, of course. Was just pointing out that such a thing did exist. Charities are not the most effective way to handle such issues, absolutely.

Charities absolutely rely on things like public relations and advertising campaigns to raise awareness that they exist and/or need funding. It leaves everyone at the mercy of which charity is "most popular" and if yours isn't very popular, you could see it disappear. It also means a significant portion of the budget is spent on things that don't actually address the real problem, which is hunger.

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (21 children)

It's called collective punishment and there's a reason it's a warcrime. Being willing to punish any and every Israeli citizen for the crimes of some is just as bad and the exact same thing as what Israel is doing by cutting off power to everyone in Gaza.

Both sides are willing to punish everyone who they consider different than them. Both Hamas and the Israeli government operate on the idea that everyone needs to be punished for the crimes of the other side.

I don't know what's so hard to understand about both partaking in collective punishment. Israel has more power, money, and resources, absolutely. They've been horrendous to the people of Palestine, for over fifty years now.

That will never justify killing innocents, my dude.

An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind.

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

...and you're treated as culturally insensitive if you point out that it's partially motivated because of two bullshit ass religions, and the reason they won't stop is because they've each just got to prove their God has the bigger dick, even though they're technically the same God.

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 33 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (29 children)

Oh, I don't disagree, but Hamas committing similar atrocities isn't helping. A war crime is a war crime is a war crime. Targeting innocent civilians is never justified, and that is something both sides continue to do: target innocent civilians. Both sides essentially are involved in collective punishment of each other. In other words, war crimes.

Both sides are guilty as hell of some really fucked up shit. Yes, Israel is the occupier, but it doesn't justify killing innocents. Period.

Just like killing innocents in Palestine makes more sympathizers for Hamas, killing innocents in Israel just makes more sympathizers for the Israeli right-wing like Netanyahu.

It's a two way street and while Palestine has been oppressed for 50-some-odd years now, it just doesn't justify killing people who had nothing to do with making those decisions.

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 12 points 8 months ago (4 children)

It definitely seems like a perspective that you have to be able to step back and be like "neither side is justified in their behavior" which is hard for people with a horse in the race to do.

 

EDIT: Downvotes with no comments. Shocker. Guess it's hard to back up your opinions, huh? I guess some people are totes fine with war criminals walking free?


What it says on the tin:

Obama told the nation that we "needed to look forward, not backward" when it came to prosecuting war criminals George W. Bush and Dick Cheney.

He would end up legalizing and codifying a lot of the worst excesses of the Bush administration.

His actions of letting war criminals walk without any consideration of what they had done literally set the stage for Donald Trump being treated with kid gloves. I don't see how the two aren't connected.

Both of them dealt with the question of "Can we successfully prosecute a former President?" Obama kicked the can down the road to ignore the question entirely, because it might appear "partisan" or something.

As evidenced by Trump's national security documents case, they really wanted to kick the can down the road again. They gave Trump every opportunity to just return the documents with nothing but a slap on the wrist. They only started bringing criminal charges when it became clear that he never had any intent of returning anything.

Obama is viewed so favorably by so many, but it's hard for me to do so when I think about this. Obama's unwillingness to address this question in his administration is outright why we are facing the governments inability to reign in Trump at all. He's done so many things that would have shown regular people the endless inside of a jail cell, but they just let him keep running around free.

When you allow criminals to walk free, other criminals see it as way to get away with whatever they want. That's pretty much how Trump treated the Presidency, a "get out of jail for fucking everything for free" card. He still views it as such. It's hard to imagine he didn't get this idea by watching previous Presidents get away with tons of shit that would see the rest of us behind bars.

Anyway, long story short: Thanks, Obama.

 

I'm so sorry for this. I'm not creative.

Forgive me Q, for I have sinned.

235
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by dingus@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
 

The website isn't worthless so much as the watermark on memes.

 

Would an advertising executive

Understand where the homeless live?

Would he know about the bubbles in his glass?

Would the bubbles in his glass

Understand what the man's golf cart is?

Do they know you can die frozen underneath an overpass?

 
85
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by dingus@lemmy.ml to c/risa@startrek.website
 

YTMND is dead. Long live YTMND.

32
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by dingus@lemmy.ml to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
 

This is how it felt.

view more: next ›