Sorry fixed link
mark
joined 1 year ago
Yeah same thing I was wondering. There are still a lot of great RSS readers. Arguably even better than Google Reader was.
Not many things require a polyfill these days. My guess is a lot of older sites are affected.
Look at the frameworks go!!! I know I know. "its not a framework"...
These were great in their day, but itβs time to move on to something better and safer.
How is it "safer" when contributing to the codebase or filing and discussing issues will now require creating an account and giving up personal information to one of the most privacy-invasive tech companies in the world? π³
Yes! Can't believe it's 2024 and websites are still not accessible. Even the biggest companies are the worst at this... and don't even get me started on their mobile sites π
Just depends on what works best for each of us. But personally, I agree with you. It's not that I think one company owning a ton of the services is a bad thing in itself. But history has shown us that, when a company starts to dominate a certain market, they tend to start becoming tone-deaf to our interests, because they know we can't (easily) switch and go somewhere else.
Eh. These sorts of metrics aren't always accurate. And the source company did the study in 2016, which was a very very different internet, and doesn't go into detail about how they were able to determine this number. I would take that with a grain of salt. I agree that just having a notice somewhere is better than not, though.
Yeah, it's definitely a very unique approach I haven't seen before. I've been using the "honeypot" method for years, which has been working surprisingly well.
Wouldn't this effectively mark all messages from a user who isn't using JavaScript as spam? π
view more: next βΊ
Yesssss, bro π