this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
514 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19144 readers
5938 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 165 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's in their own self interest to water down the sex offenders list.

[–] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 93 points 8 months ago

And reduce the number of competent educators

[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 109 points 8 months ago (6 children)

This is in Missouri, for anyone wondering.

[–] toxicbubble@lemmy.world 66 points 8 months ago (2 children)

one of the poorest states in the country, lowest IQs, most health issues, you'd think they'd have more important things to discuss..

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 57 points 8 months ago

They do, which is why distraction is so important.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 8 months ago

That would imply that care about fixing problems. They don't; they want to create problems.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's so bad I generally refuse to identify being from there. When anyone asks I just say I live in misery, with swaths of lead addled lunatics. Some think it's quaint, others understand.

[–] zip@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Being from (and stuck in) Oklahoma, I understand and I feel for you.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 months ago

Born (but thankfully not raised) in the 1 star state, hate any time I need to bring out my birth certificate.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

They seem to be leaning in to the fact the states name sounds like "misery".

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

For now, get out and vote if you're reading this.

[–] Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 8 months ago

Oooooh the Missouri~

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 86 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why do I get the feeling that the goal of this is more to dilute the meaning of the term sex offender, than it is anything else.

Weird how the party of sex offenders wants to ruin any meaning to the term sex offender.

[–] spider@lemmy.nz 28 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Weird how the party of sex offenders wants to ruin any meaning to the term sex offender.

The same applies to impeachment.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Which is why they were balls deep on russian cock and swallowing those thick and juicy lies, Until they found out the dick was from baddragon and the lies were a not-for-ingestion lotion.

Desperate to have any (imaginary) justification for the impeachment.

[–] ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone 83 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Well this is where it's headed. First it will be teachers, parents, doctors, therapists.

Then they'll want to register trans adults as sex offenders. Then all LGBTQ people.

Like so much of the government in the US, the infrastructure is there, ready to be abused. Change one line and it applies to all of us.

Anyone not realize just how awful it would be to get labeled a sex offender? It makes it almost impossible to find a place to live, or a job. People will seek you out and harass you in public. This is an extremely serious classification that shouldn't have anything to do with "culture wars". It should be reserved only for the worst classes of convicted criminals -- if it's not actually cruel and unusual and unnecessarily punative.

[–] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 45 points 8 months ago

First they came for the trans folk...just like the Nazis.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 13 points 8 months ago

Republicans are an existential threat. Removing them from power is self defense.

[–] Jagger2097@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gerbler@lemmy.world 76 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

That won't make the sex offender registry functionally useless at all... /s

If you ever needed an example of how conservatives don't actually give a shit about preventing child predation...

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 38 points 8 months ago

You mean the conservatives constantly being caught being sex offenders and child predators?

[–] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Only if you believe that there's a difference between an active pedophile and gay couple or a trans person. Some these folks don't believe there is, and the one's that do believe there is probably see getting a bunch of liberal teachers declared sex offenders as a multi-front win. Removes even stealth support for those kids from school so they are truly alone, gets the teachers out of school so they aren't "indoctrinating" the kids with history and science, and it gives you "proof" that the left is full of the Jim Jordans and Matt Gaetzs too.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 76 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The party of gross, old sex-offenders really seem to want to water down the meaning of the list many of them are/should be on.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 71 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Protect The Kids by Jailing Teachers who Protect The Kids! Also let's roll back Child Labor Laws!

[–] oDDmON@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, the GOP hated the Taliban and China so much they adopted their ideology. Truly their only problem with other countries is the color of their skin.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago

Or the resources within their borders

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 43 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Holyshit aren’t you guys very big on whatever the amendment that guarantees you free speech ? How’s this not a blatant violation of free speech ?

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It is, this is ridiculous GOP headline-grabbing outrage bait but we live in stupid universe so I can't say with absolute certainty that it won't happen.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 14 points 8 months ago

The point is to lose, so they can stoke some culture war bullshit about how free speech is dead, the government is too big, the judiciary is too woke, etc. And if it's allowed to stand, all the better.

This is an exercise in trying to build outrage before the elections, because they don't have an actual platform that involves making people's lives better.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Well they are very good in getting me triggered even though I’m 12000 km away and not concerned by those shenanigans. It’s soooo infuriating.

[–] LarryTheMatador@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

All conservatives lie always

[–] ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 8 months ago

All conservatives are bastards

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] corymbia@reddthat.com 34 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I cannot imagine being this twisted and spiteful to think this is a good idea.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] freshcow@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I hope Missouri taxpayers like their state government spending their hard earned tax dollars on lawsuits for blatantly unconstitutional laws. Who needs infrastructure, or literally anything tangible when you can just spend more money on losing? Absolutely pathetic.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Sadly, far too many around us are. If it wasn't for family etc I'd definitely have no reason to be here over anywhere else. But I enjoy giving the GOP here hell and being some added voice for those with less options.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago

It's a crime? How? This is the dumbest legislation ever.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

By “support”, do they mean treating them like human beings instead of mocking and deriding them?

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 10 points 8 months ago

Unironically, yes.

[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

The GOP are vile human beings.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Never vote GOP, ever again.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Never neglect to vote against them.

[–] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

This is much more useful advice.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 10 points 8 months ago

Fuck sakes, they just want to reinforce a fucking century old false trope.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Ooh ooh let's apply this to Sunday schools

[–] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 6 points 8 months ago

Projection again. All GOP members are sex offenders.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

https://i.imgflip.com/8horwi.jpg
"Both sides are bad!!! I'm not voting!"

load more comments
view more: next ›