It doesn't count as "malicious compliance" if Apple is not complying. Apple is simply not allowed to have one fee structure for people who use the App Store to release stuff and another for other people. See "no self-preferencing". "Not providing an App Store" is not a service. All these tantrums are going to earn them is a swift kick in the nuts from the EU.
this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
201 points (89.7% liked)
Technology
59052 readers
6622 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
We can only hope (っ˘ڡ˘ς)
I wish it was swift.
Apple isn't even required to comply with these new laws yet - so wishing the EU to enforce the rules now is pretty unrealisitc.
Fuck apple. Fuck apple. Fuck apple. Fuck apple. Fuck apple. Fuck apple. Fuck apple. Fuck apple. Fuck apple. Fuck apple. Fuck apple. Fuck apple.
Also, fuck apple simps.
Also, fuck apple simps.
Former Applecare rep here: Say it again, Trick!
Haha, I bet you had some interesting conversations with the fanboys
Tons. Still loving Margaret from 2009ish who asked me if 'we own the Google' and wouldn't take 'no'.
Hey there former colleague!
👋
The rules are in place solely to lock in free apps to the official App Store. The EU is just going to have to tell Apple to deal with it. Apple is acting like it has to verify and sign every app that runs on its platform and therefore it justifies the fees. The EU just needs to force Apple to allow unsigned apps to run and then its not a problem.
Even centrally signing every app doesn't justify a fee. There's virtually no cost in doing so. Mozilla does it for all Firefox extensions just fine.
Free apps were already pretty unsustainable in iOS to begin with given the $99 yearly developer fee :/
And since they almost force using a Mac to develop such app.
And the cost to own apple hardware (that is not exactly cheap, even 2nd hand)
Maybe it is just me, but I paid only 50€ for late 16 macbook and got late 13 for free. Ssd and memory upgrades were about 100€ (dumpster ram) and both run ventura and sonoma (OCLP) without a hitch. And both work perfectly for programming and such.
Is that what they charge? I always wondered why the Apollo guy charged a subscription for premium services, while RiF was like $4.99 one time. Guess that's why.
Such a clickbait-y headline I am not going to watch it.
Free apps aren’t changing in anyway.
The tl;dr is that for developers using the app store, nothing changes. Developers wishing to not use the app store have to agree to a new fee structure.
Apple, as expected, intends to make up for lost profits by charging more money.
If you are outside the EU none of this matters to you.
Note that I am not disagreeing with the sentiment , but rather I am disagreeing with the clickbait headline.
Well, it basically prevents something like F-Droid for iOS arising from the EU ruling. Kinda big deal. Not that the fanboys would care though. Apple is infallible.
But the whole regulation was not about installing an app outside of the App Store icon, but outside Apple. To free the market of apps, such that the manufacturer is not the only one deciding what app you can install.
It's like BMW would say you can equip tires different than from BMW store, but those other stores still must give them a fee.
Kudos. That is such a great analogy.
Right it's fine that apple is doing this, because... This video title doesn't end with "if people opt into this obviously shit set of terms". Makes sense.
Nobody said this is a great policy. I was just pointing out the garbage level reporting of it by folks like the author.
It's not garbage reporting. The title of the video is not even that misleading, because it is exactly what would happen if people opt into that. It's way less misleading than apple representing the terms here as a "choice"
It is miss-leading. You don't pay any money unless more than 2% of the EU population uses your app (there's about 50 million people in the EU who own an iPhone, and you need a million of those people to run your app to pay this fee).
If you have that many users, and zero income, then all you need to do is register as a non profit - then Apple will exempt your app entirely from the fees.
Every mass market truly free app that I can think of is already run by a non profit - so most don't have to do anything at all.
You obviously didn't watch the video
No, it is completely misleading because:
-
this change will not impact a single developer outside the EU.
-
Any developer not using a third party app store will also not be affected.
-
You can still build free apps and literally nothing changes assuming you use Apple’s app store.
Like I said, it is a shit policy, but for nearly all developers nothing changes.
The video’s thumbnail said Apple is killing free apps. That is a complete lie. There is not an ounce of truth to it.
If this is a complete lie, then their new policy "option" is 100 "complete lies". I support any effort to get out the word that apple is anti competitive as fuck, a video title being 30% inaccurate does not change that for me at all.
„Apples new fee might kill free apps in the EU that get downloaded more then one million times a year and want to be distributed via alternative app stores“ just doesn’t have the same ring to it I guess.
Realistically this will only really hit stuff like Netflix Games when they want to try to make their own store or something similar.
Pay to play/win has long since killed the proper concept of a "free" app on just about every single platform.
Looking at the huge amount of amazing open source programs on my system I would say that's a lie
This is by design tbh
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://piped.video/_6dbNzFD0zM
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Well we will be able to download the free apps that apple don’t want in their store from other stores. Sad for non EU countries. Non brainer from apple that movement will push other regions to adopt the same laws as EU.