diffusive

joined 1 year ago
[–] diffusive@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Or give psychological safety that it is demonstrated to increase productivity πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

What makes you think union decrease productivity instead?

[–] diffusive@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago

thank goodness at this point these are two separate conversations

[–] diffusive@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I really don't like french cheese. Am I racist with the french for that?

I really think that Germany has too much power over EU. Does this make me racist with Germans?

I understand some antisemitic may use war as a way to spread their idepology but the opposite is not true.

One person may disagree with the geopolic of this war without having any issue with the citizens of a country involved

[–] diffusive@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

[–] diffusive@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, i got it, but it depends from the distribution. If there is correlation on where the bad apples appears (e.g. for cultural or socio economic conditions), it is more likely that we are close to the case of 3 bunches (that is 30 apples, just 5 more than the "original" apples)

If we stop this parallelism (that is what I disagree with) and we move to the actual issue with the police, i think it's a problem with all power positions: all positions that come with power (no matter how small) attract certain kind of people. This is true from the folks that check tickets in public transportation to teachers. Police is worse because there is a lot of unchecked power and close to no accountability

The solution is not how to do bin packing of the bad apples, the solution is reducing the power, increasing accountability and add checks (e.g. while body cam have some privacy implications that i don't like, it's a step in that direction)

[–] diffusive@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

between 3 and 25, depending from the distribution... And your point is? 🀷

[–] diffusive@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Well it sounds more scary than it realistically will be.

YouTube must pass to the player the metadata of where the ads start/end. Why? Because they need to be unskippable/unseekable/etc. If the metadata is there it is possible to force the seek πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

Just matter of time

[–] diffusive@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

Likely android 7 would not honor (or even be aware) of this new metadata bit. You'll be fine πŸ™‚

[–] diffusive@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

You are technically (and possibly legally) correct... But the spirit of the law is allowing customers to install what they want on their devices.

This move defuses the responsibility to the developers but EU showed in the past that what they care is the spirit of the law and not the law itself...and they are happy to change the laws to make them more adherent to the spirit

[–] diffusive@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Not sure what this reference is demonstrating in the context of domestic violence.

That reference says

77% of which involved male victims and 23% female victims

So it is about killing in general not domestic violence

Men kill more and are killed more. This is not a secret and not exactly demonstrating that men are wrong, just that some β€œindustries” (e.g. organised crime) are men only clubs (not sure if this is a demonstration of anything about how good or bad men are).

Do you have a reference specific to this topic?

[–] diffusive@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Would you please provide data supporting this stance?

view more: next β€Ί