this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
147 points (97.4% liked)

politics

19159 readers
5938 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 54 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Voter fraud, brought to you by the Republican Party.

They would literally rather go to jail than allow fair elections.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago

“If conservatives become convinced that they cannot win democratically, they will not abandon conservatism. They will reject democracy.”

I hate how often this quote is relevant lately.

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Nah, this is election fraud. Voter fraud is something slightly different.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 40 points 11 months ago (1 children)

God I wonder what party they are. Gosh such a mystery. Suppose we'll just have to assume it was both sides. Cant afford to be specific in the title.

#JustMainstreamNewsThings

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Well, as long as people refuse to read the article (first two words of the article, by the way) I guess we'll just have to deal with titles.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Hard to do with a paywall. Guess I'll never know...

[–] ForestOrca@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

I can't quite make it out, maybe y'all can help: "PHOENIX — Two Republicans who lead a rural county in southern Arizona were indicted by a state grand jury this week for allegedly flouting last year’s deadline to formally accept the results of the 2022 midterm election."

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Holy shit! Those words under the title actually do something??? I just though it was a weird sentence with funny futuristic punctuation. Anyway, now that I see that those"linked" words ^TM actually go somewhere, time to go back to inferring meaning from just the post title. Did y'all ever find out which party did it?

[–] Eh_I@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So I clicked and it looks like some jerk called 'Sign in' did it. Mystery solved.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

I hate Sign In! That jerk keeps trying to get my passwords!

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If you're still with Republicans through all this, you're either in the bottom 5th percentile in awareness, or you know Republicans are crooks and don't care.

[–] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I also think some people are really good at refusing to see connections. Just a few bad apples, they'll think.

Or that the charges were not legit... Remember "process crimes!"

Or that they were doing what was morally right so it doesn't matter if it's illegal.

And so on...

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 8 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes (D) on Wednesday announced the felony indictments of Cochise County supervisors Peggy Judd and Terry Thomas “Tom” Crosby.

The three-member Cochise County board eventually did vote to certify the results of the election, but only after a judge ordered they do so.

“You will meet today,” Superior Court Judge Casey F. McGinley told the three members of the Cochise County Board of Supervisors last year.

When the board convened at 3:30 p.m., with Crosby absent, Judd and the remaining supervisor, Ann English, a Democrat, voted to certify the results.

The surrender, under court order, ended a standoff in Cochise County that threatened to upend the state’s process for affirming the will of more than 2.5 million Arizona voters.

The ensuing chaos could have undermined the projected victories of Republicans in a U.S. House seat and the statewide race for schools superintendent.


The original article contains 407 words, the summary contains 146 words. Saved 64%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

The two Cochise County Supervisors charged should hire Kenneth Chesebro as their attorney so us proles can have some levity making cheese puns.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

These reports seem more frequent all of a sudden. We just had one 3 days ago. Republicans have been spending all their time chasing dead ends and others have been zeroing in on GOP fuckery.