this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
502 points (97.7% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35735 readers
1613 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

To be clear: I prefer to pay for things instead of having to see ads but 13€ / month!? For a meta product that has inherently user-hostile design patterns even without ads?

Who does this appeal to?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jacktherippah@lemmy.world 136 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Just stop using Instagram. I quit mainstream social media (Facebook, Instagram, Reddit,...) and the experience has been quite cathartic.

[–] LanternEverywhere@kbin.social 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been off of all social media for about a decade, but just yesterday i got a dm from someone from my past so i went and checked it out and then I checked a bunch of other stuff there too and my mental state instantly spiraled into a terrible place. Man that shit is toxic like nuclear waste.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lemmy is social media too, don't forget that.

[–] Ashyr@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 year ago

It's not talking to people that's damaging. Being able to socialize and discuss via media is healthy.

The damaging component is when an algorithm pushes unhealthy content because it drives engagement.

No one set out to create a rage/depression/anxiety algorithm, but those emotions tend to drive engagement better than more positive experiences. So if engagement is the goal, you get destructive systems.

Removing the algorithm does a lot for helping people engage with their peers and society at large in a more constructive context.

[–] LanternEverywhere@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No it's not. Social media is where you know who the other person is and/or they know who you are. This is an anonymous forum, not social media.

[–] Instigate@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Social media are interactive technologies that facilitate the creation and sharing of content, ideas, interests, and other forms of expression through virtual communities and networks. While challenges to the definition of social media arise due to the variety of stand-alone and built-in social media services currently available, there are some common features:

  • Social media are interactive Web 2.0 Internet-based applications.
  • User-generated content—such as text posts or comments, digital photos or videos, and data generated through all online interactions—is the lifeblood of social media.
  • Users create service-specific profiles for the website or app that are designed and maintained by the social media organization.
  • Social media helps the development of online social networks by connecting a user's profile with those of other individuals or groups.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_media

Lemmy fits those criteria very well, and there’s nothing regarding anonymous profiles vs identified profiles. It may not be the only definition of social media, but it’s comprehensive and sensible.

[–] Claidheamh@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Then email is also social media, Google docs is social media, phpBB is social media, Amazon review sections are social media, even Pornhub comment sections are social media, and so on...

If Lemmy fits the criteria, then so does 95% of the internet. Not a very useful definition, in that case.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

As much as I'd love to, it's not exactly easy when you rely on it for business :(

[–] Kir@feddit.it 7 points 1 year ago

I did too and, while the benefit are higher than the loss, I usually feel really left out from one kind of partecipation to society and it's a bit sad.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Hyzerflip@lemmy.world 79 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They don’t want you to pay. They set the price artificially high to discourage you so they continue business as usual while complying to the laws. The price is a PITA charge to make it worth their while and to still profit from the ads they would have shown you.

[–] AttackPanda@programming.dev 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’ve never used IG but I feel like it would be a $3.99/month type of service. This price just tells us they are making way more than that serving ads or that your ad data alone is worth a decent bit of cash.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a $0 per month type of service, even without ads.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sim642@lemm.ee 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Now we know how much they're making with tracking and ads per user.

[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

They are still going to be tracking you. That isn't going away.

They just won't use the tracking for the explicit reason of creating ads for you. But that's only because you are paying for no ads.

I guarantee the data is logged for all other purposes, and that the data is logged for future ad usage if you ever unsubscribe.

Secondly this doesn't necessarily equate the profit from your specific ads. This is the result of a legal battle within the EU. That's the only reason it exists. The price is determined as 'high enough to not get into more legal trouble'.

https://www.euronews.com/next/2023/10/30/ad-free-subscription-versions-of-facebook-and-instagram-to-start-in-the-eu#:~:text=The%20US%20tech%20giant%20is,before%20showing%20ads%20to%20users.

[–] whofearsthenight@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Meta already demonstrably does this. I deleted my real Facebook in like 2016. Around 2019-2020, I created a new burner account to browse Marketplace with nearly all fake info expect my name, phone, and email. And lo and behold all of my friend suggestions are people I know and mostly were on the old account. The most charitable I can imagine is that those suggestion had me in their contacts which they agree to share with Facebook (which is problematic af imo) but it is extremely likely they just retain all of data especially since many of the people I was suggested have never had my current number/email.

[–] jarfil@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

You deleted your real Facebook account... but did you delete the anonymous shadow account...?

It's not that Facebook hasn't deleted the data from your real account, it's that they keep tons of "anonymous" shadow accounts, each one of us probably has a dozen of them from different interactions with Facebook, and your new account most likely got suggestions from getting paired with those.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dasgoat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I also think this subscription model has run into criticism from EU legislators/regulators as well, which will have to be decided upon. Basically Meta isn't out of the doghouse yet.

Really, I'd say strip Meta of all its assets and dissolve the whole thing, maybe try some of the heads for all the shit they've pulled in the ICC? Like failing to act on genocides or actively working to incite mass violence, political unrest, etcetera.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think this is much more likely what they think people will pay. And/or what they think a percentage of people will pay that will cover costs/lost revenue from other users leaving. They have basically zero incentive to make it a 1-to-1 replacement.

[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If capitalism has taught us anything.

The cost of goods to produce is almost never equal to, or related to, to the sale price.

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

You would have to pay me 13 Euro a month to even consider using this platform

[–] Kekzkrieger@feddit.de 36 points 1 year ago

Just quit, these platform thrive on user generated content while selling your data and now they want money from you so you continue to create content for them.

All because they make you believe that you NEED them to stay in contact and up to date. In reality it's much nicer to speak with friends personally, show a few pics and talk about your/their experience.

Too often when i still used that social media crap people would just cut me off with "yeah i've seen that already on fb,insta etc." and no experience shared.

Being off social media, as weird as that sounds, made me feel more social and it's more fun to interact with ppl again.

[–] privsecfoss@feddit.dk 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's Meta's nonsense reply to being forced by the European data protection authorities (EDPB) to get consent before processing users data, which they should have from the beginning: https://edpb.europa.eu/news/news/2023/edpb-urgent-binding-decision-processing-personal-data-behavioural-advertising-meta_en

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Products!? I thought they were services...

Anyway I don't see myself ever paying for social media LMAO, and even less now that I know about the Fediverse... Seems like a VIP lounge for us if you ask me, and I'm okay with that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 31415926535@lemm.ee 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Phone got stolen last year. New phone, installed instagram, tried to log into account, but locked out.

Instagram tech support told me I either had to: 1) take a photo of myself, they'd check if it matched any selfies in my account, or; 2) I had to associate my Facebook profile.

I'm security conscious enough to not post selfies online, nor use Facebook. Goodbye instagram.

[–] woshang@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

They are trying to steal more info from us, thats it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

13 euros a month... hahahahahaaaa

[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A number thought up by some yank that doesn't realise that's what our whole fuckin internet connection costs each month 😂

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Chup@feddit.de 28 points 1 year ago

It's disappointing that they only exclude the information use regarding ads.

So they will still track everything users do and profile them, just like any other free user. And they can sell to everyone else who pays for user data (e.g. AI learning, market research etc.). With that wording, they could even sell to ad companies, if they e.g. use the data for some algorithm optimisation in their tech department. So they leave the door open to keep selling the data to 3rd parties, while already charging the user 'starting at' 12.99€.

[–] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They forgot the third option: don't use it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have absolutely zero faith in Instagram's ability to manage this. They can't even handle account access right. I use IG for business (I'm a performer) and have been locked out for a month with full access to my Facebook, email, authenticator app, phone, other accounts - you name it. Their shit is just straight up broken and throws error messages when trying to log in.

[–] MrSqueezles@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago

I want to make the, "free", moniker illegal. Advertisers have to pay money for ads and they get that money from us when we buy their products. In addition to having to look at ads, we also have to pay money for the privilege of looking at them. Any ad supported service is objectively not free. No thanks.

[–] yoz@aussie.zone 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Lol people actually pay for shit like this ?

Not to mention $13? Looool

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

13 bucks to allow meta to use your the photos you upload (that creates all the content on the site) to however the fuck they want as well as collect all your data to sell things back to you better and sell your profile to other sites.

Megacorps need to die.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] irotsoma@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would normally be ok with paying for a service that offered something I valued if it meant they weren't also going to make money from me as a product. This pretty much just says it won't use your data for displaying ads. That's the least important thing to me. I am more concerned with them selling my data or giving my data to organization that are planning to harm me with it. If an app was actually useful and being updated with new user centered features rather than only new monetization features and additionally would agree not to sell my data, ever, and to let me actually delete that data on request, I'd be happy to pay that much.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Pechente@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

No friends there either.

Well to be fair I'm still enjoying Mastodon a lot and Pixelfed too (which is the better Instagram replacement) but pretty much everyone I follow is somebody I don't know in real life. Instagram is great to see what your extended circle of friends is doing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

You'll still see ads through. If not targeted and even not served by meta, a lot of the content shared by users on the platform is actually ads.

But I agree, the price is ridiculous

[–] hahattpro@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Use fediverse instead. ditch instagram

[–] gtaman@iusearchlinux.fyi 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ropegirth@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 1 year ago

Even this approach is about to be declared illegal by the EU, then what?

[–] FQQD@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago

this doesn't seem legal. at least - it god damn shouldn't be

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So that's how much my data is worth to Meta?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nicetriangle@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

I've just taken the app off my phone and use adblock when I'm on the desktop browser version. I still need social media to post my work out there (I get clients that way), but I don't need to look at it 100 times a day.

It's honestly been a big quality of life improvement to take all my social media off my phone. Been a month or two now and I really miss it a lot less than I thought I would and who knows how much time I'm saving.

[–] tslnox@reddthat.com 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

FB the same. Fine, I don't want to pay for your dumb content (even when you successfully trained my brain to enjoy that content) so show me ads...

But then they "forced" me to accept tracking cookies which makes me angry... Still I'm not ready to leave, but I'm a big step nearer than before.

Also, isn't that against EU laws?

[–] PurpleTentacle@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also, isn't that against EU laws?

Very likely, but the final verdict is still out on that one, as far as I know. There are several other services and sites that offer similar opt-out of tracking and ads for money schemes (albeit not as ludicrously expensive).

I believe that's both against the spirit and any reasonable interpretation of the law, but I don't think it has been fully tested in court.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mojo@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They definitely coordinated this and did it with all the other social media. Is nobody buying their data anymore? Brave of them to straight up admit they're using your data for ads though, and they're implying it's a bad thing.

[–] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 year ago

This is happening because of some issue meta was facing in the EU regarding ads, privacy, et al

load more comments
view more: next ›