this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
262 points (96.1% liked)

Linux Gaming

16067 readers
39 users here now

Gaming on the GNU/Linux operating system.

Recommended news sources:

Related chat:

Related Communities:

Please be nice to other members. Anyone not being nice will be banned. Keep it fun, respectful and just be awesome to each other.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RQG@lemmy.world 195 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Valve good.

But valve company. Company bad.

But valve company do good thing.

But selfish reason.

But good outcome.

But what if no GabeN.

We pray.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 108 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Valve is motivated by money. But their strategy is to make excellent products, that put the customers first. A rare sight these days.

[–] julianh@lemm.ee 78 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the the main reason is that they're private with no intention to go public. They're not beholden to random shareholders who know nothing about games and just want infinite growth, their decisions are actually made by people inside the company.

[–] thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I played a lot of Sierra games in the 80s. I grew away from computers for a while and at silver point in the 90s, Sierra sold out. They were basically drug through the mud, canned all its devs and became a brand rather than a software company. Sierra was also the first publisher of Half Life.

I was reading the history of Sierra there other night on Wikipedia and was sad because so many great games came out of that company and most were memorable. Hard to see that in any gaming these days

Back to my point, I started thinking that Valve saw what happened to Sierra and Newell decided fairly early on that they would be a software company and publisher and not sell out to a third party or take the company into the market. Pure speculation on my part, but they got their start sort of at the end of life of a bunch of 80s software companies. EA is certainly a shadow of what it was but it's still around at least as a brand.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Valve's strategy is to maintain dominance of their software platform, Steam.

It has been pushing Linux as a viable computer platform as a counter to if/when Microsoft wanted to monetize PC gaming in direct competition to Steam, which seems to be a wise decision.

[–] KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 year ago (14 children)

As we get closer to Microsoft forcefully shoving windows 11 down our throats, more and more I consider switching to Linux as my daily driver for home.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] backhdlp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Valve is one of the few big companies that still knows money comes from users and users come from a good product

[–] 1847953620@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

sometimes users come from other users

[–] backhdlp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's the advertisement part that I skipped because it doesn't fit so well, the users need to hear about the good product before becoming a user.

[–] crapwittyname@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also, when a mummy user and a daddy user love each other very much, they go into a special private online matchmaking lobby and make little baby users.

[–] 1847953620@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

but if they turn out to be ms edge users, those get aborted out of the womb.

[–] vivadanang@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

verily, from their loins they cometh

[–] jelloeater85@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Gaben is fucking smart and gives a shit.

[–] Landmammals@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Not just money, they're motivated by a long-term success. A lot of these companies can't see past this quarter's profits and bring a lot of Goodwill trying to make the numbers go up forever.

[–] toastal@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If they ever went public & were legally bound to make profit for shareholders, there would be no good feelings anymore.

[–] RQG@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Going public is usually bad for product quality and consumer oriented business models.

[–] Tak@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Private companies still have shareholders who they are bound to make profit for. They're just shareholders not fixated on stock value as it's not publicly traded.

[–] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago

Private companies aren’t bound to make profit. I purposefully tanked my companies profit to literally 0 during the pandemic so I could keep my employee on at full wage while only open half time. A private company can make profit for shareholders, but it doesn’t have to. It can do whatever the shareholders want it to do, within the boundaries of the law.

[–] doofer_name@feddit.de 16 points 1 year ago
[–] UprisingVoltage@feddit.it 11 points 1 year ago
[–] Sloogs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 119 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The day Gaben resigns from Valve will be a terrible day. I hope he has his succession in order.

[–] KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Please pay this monthly access fee to maintain access to your account."

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“Please pay this monthly access fee to maintain access to your account.”

that's the day you download all your game catalog to disk and cancel your account, of course

[–] iso@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago

Or hope that GoG finally created their Linux client, although it has only be requested by a quiet minority of literally every single suggestion on their community wishlist.

For the love of the gods CDPR, please, finally realize that Linux users are you main customer base.

[–] EccTM@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago

The "bluescreen" was actually a bunch of hints at Portal 2's announcement at E3 later that year IIRC, but whatever.

[–] ElectroLisa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"This isn't working" SteamVR on Linux after another "bugfix"

[–] eclipse@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Seriously though. After years SteamVR still doesn't work with their own headset.

[–] ElectroLisa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago

Even plural, this applies to Vive and Vive Pro

[–] euphoric_cat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it does work totally fine, it just doesn't have feature parity with windows. use it all the time :)

[–] ElectroLisa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it doesn't. 2.0 update broke the async reprojection altogether, I'm getting no image with it being enabled. Having it disabled causes input lag which makes me feel like I'm drunk. Exiting SteamVR crashes Steam, which is inconvenient for people with Family mode enabled.

[–] euphoric_cat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 13 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/2ykpbMs0OAg?feature=shared

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] Deykun@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Still relevant over a decade later

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

And yet there are linux users who know about it and still buy stuff with NVIDIA in it.

What saddens me is that there are even linux hardware vendors that actively sell stuff with NVIDIA in it.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 4 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://www.piped.video/watch?v=iYWzMvlj2RQ

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

load more comments
view more: next ›