this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
342 points (97.0% liked)

World News

39011 readers
2413 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 169 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] ExistensialDread@lemmy.world 108 points 1 year ago (5 children)

he's about to reverse the population increase of India

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 91 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Oneobi@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because every democracy is an oligarchy masquerading as a democracy... It's a big club, and you ain't in it!

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

That's why Parliamentary Democracies are the best kind.

[–] Holyhandgrenade@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

I'm sure this fucker hasn't worked a 70 hour workweek in his entire life. Hell, I'd be surprised if he's worked 40.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 5 points 1 year ago

It works in Japan.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 83 points 1 year ago (2 children)

70 hours a week...

So would he prefer 10 hours a day, every day? Or just 14 hours a day, 5 days a week?

Are they just not supposed to go to school?

I'm pretty sure we've seen the end results of this:

https://youtu.be/YOnSXw9coq8

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 6 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/YOnSXw9coq8

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Thank you, I always enjoy a good Indiana Jones

[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago

Coming from a guy thats never put in an honest hour of work in his life.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago

I disagree. Narayana Murthy should work 70 hours a week, all while sucking my balls.

[–] theinspectorst@kbin.social 57 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Rishi Sunak's father-in-law, everyone.

[–] JTheDoc@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Makes sense....

[–] Mandy@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 year ago

An old dusty fart who never had a real days work since most of us has been alive is telling young people to work more, never heard that one before

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or ... hear me out.

3 workers who each work 24 hours a week. It would create jobs!

But then they have to pay 3 workers, which they don't like.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

So slave labor.

[–] AttackPanda@programming.dev 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I assume an increase in hours of that magnitude comes with at least a doubling of pay.

[–] pgetsos@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

It won't, but even triple money don't make it any better!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Time for India to get hungry and eat its billionaires

We shouldn't let anyone limp crotched enough to use the word "youngster" participate in any societal decisisons at all.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can't imagine a workforce producing any efficiency or quality of output at 70. We already know these things outperform with shorter work weeks.

[–] intrepid@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Do you honestly think they care about efficiency or quality? They sell man hours, not products.

[–] intrepid@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

Aaaw! Won't you think of the poor old billionaires? They aren't earning well enough because the 'youngsters' are lazy!

[–] NBCooks@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow. That website is cancer on mobile.

[–] kirk781@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I couldn't open the article. Prompt to sign in via X site, then sign up for newsletter; it is shitty.

Coming to the article, his argument makes no sense. India's youths don't need to burn the midnight oil to catch up to developed countries. India has a lot of unemployed, underemployed(people having a degree higher than what they are working in; imagine having a MBA and doing a clerical job, that is common here) people.

On the contrary, I would argue there is oversupply of skilled labor in the country but not enough jobs (cough population cough). Logically, you can start instituting four week days and hire extra people. Sure, ultimately company need to pony up more but that is a logical way forward.

Oh, and there are a multitude of things that no amount of work from youths can change in India, which stop it from rising further as a country. But I will stop my rant. Suffice to say, I expected more from a man of his stature than such a statement.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

India has a lot of educated people who speak English. They should be doing much better than they are. Corruption, the Caste System, and their time zone (opposite the US) are hurting them.

[–] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Such a utterly stupid idea. The opposite would make much more sense. Young people should not work at all and concentrate on their young children, educate them, spend time with them, etc. so that they can grow up into valuable citizens. Old people on the other hand should work until they drop dead.

[–] Chariotwheel@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Counterpoint: all people should work to their best ability and happiness.

[–] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs"

I could get behind that.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

This reminds me of Hey Mon with the Hedleys, with the lazy son who "only" has two jobs.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope it changes to be more moral. Taking down those scam centres could be a good start.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

That would crash the entire Indian economy.

[–] xenoclast@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

You first, bud

[–] amenotef@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you say this you give a shit about quality of life.

[–] sagrotan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Guess who'll die first, that old fuck or we. Rip bozo.

load more comments
view more: next ›