this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
36 points (100.0% liked)

Chat

7483 readers
6 users here now

Relaxed section for discussion and debate that doesn't fit anywhere else. Whether it's advice, how your week is going, a link that's at the back of your mind, or something like that, it can likely go here.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 44 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Once we get invaded by aliens and we have another species to be racist against.

[–] averyminya@beehaw.org 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I used to think The Watchmen approach would be an effective one as well, however these days I'm really wondering just how many politicians and corpos would sell out to warlord aliens if they could.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What's the watchmen approach?

[–] averyminya@beehaw.org 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

In order to prevent the nearing WWIII, the greatest mind alive, Ozymandias, puts together a plan for world peace in which he fakes an alien invasion. His idea being that with the threat of an extra-terrestrial invasion at hand humanity must unite as one to defeat a common enemy.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Also he kills three million people...

[–] averyminya@beehaw.org 4 points 11 months ago

Details, details... WWIII probably would have to! (/S lol)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] interolivary@beehaw.org 6 points 11 months ago

Half of the population wouldn't believe in an alien invasion and they'd blame it on wOkE pEoPlE

[–] renard_roux@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Or, you know, mole people. That might work.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I could vibe with mole people

[–] renard_roux@beehaw.org 4 points 11 months ago

Well I guess we know what side you'll be on 😳

I want to say 'turncoat' but 'moleskin' seems more appropriate 🐭

[–] jhulten@infosec.pub 23 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Another near extinction event that takes us down to about 1200 individuals should do it.

[–] decivex@pawb.social 11 points 11 months ago

Not if they are part of those 1200.

[–] douglasg14b@beehaw.org 19 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Honestly?

Heat death of the universe.

Our biology is hardwired for tribalism.

[–] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This really. There are good people in the world, unfortunately the sociopaths and psychopaths tend to gravitate to positions of power, the few leading the many to extinction.

[–] GreenMario@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

And the rest are DNA coded to go hard/wet over these strongman sociopaths that they can't help but want to please them and do their bidding . It's fucking sick.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

You know, we do have the technology to change our biology.

[–] LoamImprovement@beehaw.org 4 points 11 months ago

If you can afford it. And those that can don't want to because they like how things are now, with everyone else's necks under their heels.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Well, sure, explosives and high levels of radiation tend to change biology... they also accelerate the heat death of the universe, so that's two birds with one missile, I guess? 🤷

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] khalic@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oh the good ol’ “there’s nothing we can do”

Scratching your asshole is also hardwired, doesn’t mean we have to do it…

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] khalic@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago

I mean, not in public ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

[–] mycatiskai@lemmy.one 18 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Somewhere around the time when there is three humans left on the planet, two of them will unite together to kill the third one. For a brief moment after the third one is dead the last two humans will be united in not knowing which one will attack the other one first.

[–] Radiant_sir_radiant@beehaw.org 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I came here to write something along the lines of this.

And the last couple of humans will spend an awul lot of time reassuring each other that circumstances beyond their control forced them to react like they did and there was no way they could have done anything differently.

Let's face it, while there were/are promising moments, we as a species are a failed experiment.

[–] jcg@halubilo.social 6 points 11 months ago

Makes me ponder that old bit of wisdom. Why does Ross, the largest friend, not simply eat the other five?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] taanegl@beehaw.org 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I have this personal belief that a lot of problems in this world would be solved if we ended poverty.

The mental health pandemic, conflicts, corruption. It all gets exaggerated because people can't fulfill basic needs or even pursue happiness. People are then more easily weaponized and subverted.

A little rant here, but I blame liberalism and US politicians purely for abusing their influence on a worldwide basis. Not that Europe isn't part and parcel of the issue, but if we look at Nixon, Reagen, "new public management", "trickle down economics", not to mention subverting US labour in a capitalist persuit to export manufacturing and fabrication to COMMUNIST CHINA, we see that "leaders" of politics and industry ruined modernity with their hypocrisy and social manipulation to justify degenerate greed, narcesism and idolatry.

I don't think it was fully intentional. I truly believe they have swallowed their own KoolAid - in that they are delusional, as well as degenerate while wearing "the emperors new clothes" and manipulated politics to conform to their delusions. This should be the issue of our time, in that poverty can be eradicated if we just got our collective heads out of our asses.

End rant.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@beehaw.org 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It isn't in our nature as a species to unite and work together. The closest we got was COVID and even the threat of mass viral death only united us for about 2-3 weeks before people were starting fights over closed hair salons.

[–] deo@beehaw.org 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

COVID really killed my faith in humanity, and it blindsided me. I truly believed people in general would come together in such a situation, but it just... didn't happen. Giving people shit for wearing a mask? Or, heaven forbid, having the audacity to request someone wear a mask around you? Let's not forget the people hoarding toilet paper like that's an appropriate response. I know it sounds small in the grand scheme of things, but it requires a certain level of "fuck you, i got mine" to buy three-dozen rolls of TP when the shelves are already bare.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] baggins@beehaw.org 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Sadly, I don't think it'll ever happen.

There is always going to be someone that wants power over others. And someone who hates others. It's human nature. We'll never be like the perfect Star Trek world, all chummy and getting along.

More like The Expanse.

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The United Earth government in Star Trek looks almost as unrealistic as Faster Than Light travel.

A united earth government isn't contrary to any physics law I'm aware of, but that would take a strong political will, not just from leaders but from the general population, as well as a very long time.

The European Union has been a work in progress for 70 years to integrate different countries into one political system. Lots have been done, but it's still far from a small-scale United Earth. Every country hold onto its sovereignty, and a consensus from all 27 member states is required for many things, so it's moving rather slowly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] interolivary@beehaw.org 4 points 11 months ago

The Expanse but without the space travel.

Our meatbag bodies just aren't made for space travel, living off-planet would be unbelievably hard and all "colonies" would be dependent on Earth, and a magical engine that breaks the laws of physics will never be invented

[–] khalic@beehaw.org 9 points 11 months ago

Moving away from hyper hierarchic systems that concentrate power would be a good start.

It's never going to happen.

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 7 points 11 months ago

10^106 years, when "the universe enters the so-called Dark Era and is expected to consist chiefly of a dilute gas of photons and leptons. With only very diffuse matter remaining, activity in the universe will have tailed off dramatically, with extremely low energy levels and extremely long timescales."

[–] 0x01@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 months ago

Globalization is already well underway, our economies are entertwined, our technological advances, our medicine, knowledge, and even entertainment.

There is war, incompatible theologies, racism, hate, and all sorts of stuff that has the appearance of not being "united". As long as humans exist those things will persist. We're not robots, our flaws exist because of the nature of our biology.

I think it's fair from at least this perspective to say we're already united.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

Literally never

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

As long as it takes to develop brain implants that no longer get rejected or make you die from vomiting, and everyone gets to join "𝕏, the unified consciousness".

(* what we work towards, may no longer reflect any individual desires)

[–] ag_roberston_author@beehaw.org 6 points 11 months ago

Never going to happen.

[–] redballooon@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago (3 children)

The Culture series from Ian banks shows how that can happen: beneficial AIs take over and govern to the good of all living beings.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] luciole@beehaw.org 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I don't know how long, but I'm still hopeful. Humanity has gone from small groups of nomadic family groups, to early city states housing thousands, to countries uniting millions. The mediocrity of modern capitalism makes us forget what we've achieved through the millenias.

The radical transformation we are provoking on our ecosystem will humble us and push us as a specie to adapt yet again. It'll be quite a ride and who knows what's on the other side.

[–] Dogyote@slrpnk.net 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I think one of the best ways to unite people is a common threat or enemy. Since an alien invasion is unlikely, we're left with a couple less clear scenarios that I can think of:

  1. A crazy rogue nation hell bent on plantary destruction would probably get a unified response. Best candidate is a Republican controlled United States or perhaps another petro state ignoring carbon emissions with climate change really getting bad.

  2. Climate change just gets really bad and demands a coordinated response.

  3. An international revolution that removes power from the currently ruling classes. My thinking here is that international conflict is started by oligarchs and other elites across the world. For example, I doubt the average Russian would even consider invading Ukraine if it weren't for those at the top running a shit economy and using the media to spread lies. Similar for the Chinese and Taiwan, Americans and the whole world, etc. I just have a hard time believing large human populations would fight over something in this age without being encouraged to do so by those who would benefit.

[–] baggins@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago

Sorry, can't see any of those things uniting the human race.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago
  1. The evangelicals have been for decades sending funds intended for Israel's takeover of Palestine, hoping that would trigger an Armageddon (aka: planetary extinction event) and the second coming of Christ. I see no uniting of humanity against homicidal religions, more like the opposite.
  2. Climate change is a multi-century thing. It requires no unified response, just an "each one find their own way to conquer a piece of Antarctica" and kill everyone else in their way.
  3. Elites have both nukes and nuclear shelters, they wouldn't be the ones on the losing end of a worldwide revolution.

The closest thing to a planetary threat, is giving control of the military to some AI... but given that several countries are already working on that, the more likely outcome is for everyone to get killed by everyone else, before anyone can unite.

[–] insurgenRat@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago

I don't think that's likely, we are apes not angels.

Sometimes we have conflicts, some are probably resolvable, some represent fundamentally opposed interests.

We can try to make society different, so there are fewer situations that lead to irresolvable conflicts. That project will never end.

Whether this gives you hope or grief is largely up to you.

[–] ericjmorey@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago

I don't think that will ever happen.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

Is that really what we want?

imho there should always be a place where people who disagree with the powers that be can go and do their own thing.

Again, my opinion, but I think maybe 80% unity is the way to go.

[–] Thelsim@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I doubt we'll ever end up with a future wherein all of humanity is fully united and working towards a unified society. But that doesn't necessarily have to be a bad thing. Divergence in beliefs and attitudes can be a healthy thing as long as it doesn't hurt the individual.
Maybe, in hundreds of years, we might unified enough that we can tolerate and accept each other's differences. I have no idea what that future would look like, but I'd be happy if we manage to achieve that much.

load more comments
view more: next ›