0x01

joined 1 year ago
[–] 0x01@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Leetcode is a great way to polish your skills. When I was your age, I read programming books and made projects I cared about, it's turned out very well.

I've helped a few others learn programming, practice and working on any project at all always help more than anything.

[–] 0x01@lemmy.ml 78 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

That's really the foundational problem. If you could exist without bugging or being bugged by the neighbors dense housing would be so much more appealing

[–] 0x01@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Very demure of you

[–] 0x01@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 weeks ago

Llama3 local is pretty good

[–] 0x01@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Looks cool, when was the last time Zelda was a playable character in a mainline Zelda game?

[–] 0x01@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago
[–] 0x01@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago

I still remember flipboard being forcefully installed as the action button app for an old phone. My rage continues to smolder a decade later.

An app that couldn't be uninstalled and took up precious resources. That's all they'll ever be to me.

[–] 0x01@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago

Just collect your tears and pour them over the tree, plenty of salt coming out of you

[–] 0x01@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Harris has me profoundly optimistic. She's the most qualified candidate I'll have had the chance to vote for in my lifetime.

Walz is fine, I was keen on Buttigieg but I'll happily vote for Walz and let Buttigieg keep his important current position.

My biggest hope is that Kamala will draw out some of the less extreme right leaning women, nobody needs to know that they're voting for the better candidate and God knows women need allies with the ongoing barrage.

This election cycle is not about fear for me, Harris is an easy candidate to vote for!

[–] 0x01@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I explained a little about buffer overflows, but in essence programming is the act of making a fancy list of commands for your computer to run one after the other.

One concept in programming is an "array" or list of things, sometimes in languages like C the developer is responsible for keeping track of how many items are in a list. When that program accepts info from other programs (like a chat message, video call, website to render, etx) in the form of an array sometimes the sender can send more info than the developer expected to receive.

When that extra info is received it can actually modify the fancy list of commands in such a way that the data itself is run directly on the computer instead of what the developer originally intended.

Bad guy sends too much data, at the end of the data are secret instructions to install a new program that watches every key you type on your keyboard and send that info to the bad guy.

[–] 0x01@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 month ago (11 children)

There is a ton of literature out there, but in a few words:

Rust is built from the ground up with the intention of being safe, and fast. There are a bunch of things you can do when programming that are technically fine but often cause errors. Rust builds on decades of understanding of best practices and forces the developer to follow them. It can be frustrating at first but being forced to use best practices is actually a huge boon to the whole community.

C is a language that lets the developer do whatever the heck they want as long as it's technically possible. "Dereferencing pointer 0?" No problem boss. C is fast but there are many many pitfalls and mildly incorrect code can cause significant problems, buffer overflows for example can open your system to bad actors sending information packets to the program and cause your computer to do whatever the bad actor wants. You can technically write code with that problem in both c and rust, but rust has guardrails that keep you out of trouble.

[–] 0x01@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 month ago

Ah yeah good call

 

I wonder if there's anyone out there who can't see their nose at all?

view more: next ›