this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
961 points (97.3% liked)

Comic Strips

12026 readers
2282 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 92 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Lol 10-15% of our income? I'm sorry... But who can afford that? We're getting so fucked right now by greed in this country...

My power bill was $500 last month for a two bedroom apartment. This is because I live in a city with the highest energy rates in the nation, all because the company and our local governments are absolutely lousy with corruption. They have posted obscene record profits for the last half a decade while everyone in the city suffers.

My rent was also 21% higher this year than it was in 2020. My landlord bought this place a decade ago at a bankruptsy auction, but like, fuck me right? Gatta keep those rates up when the rest of the city goes up.

I also haven't saved money since around 2019, since I went four years with a 0% raise due to the company I work for struggling. We were bought out by another company with tons of money, but they decided we were overpaid, since they live in a cheaper city.

My story is not unique. My story is not special. I hear a similar one from people every week. Retirement is a luxury most post-boomers will never experience, no matter how hard we work.

[–] ericbomb@lemmy.world 55 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So you're supposed to do 50-30-20 Meaning 50% on needs 30% on wants 20% investing

You might be thinking "Ericbomb, how does one keep their needs below 50%, when the median rent in the US is $2,000, and median household income after taxes/withholdings is near 40k?"

Wonderful question!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I've never owned a gun in my life. The day I go to buy one is the day I start planning for my "retirement."

I'm still doing the 401k thing and trying to save on the side, but just like homeownership, retirement is for "other people," not me :/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 67 points 11 months ago (5 children)

If you have perfect knowledge of the future and know which stocks will do well, why bother with trying to diversify your portfolio to try to mirror the market?

[–] insomniac_lemon@kbin.social 123 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

So, as it turns out there are a few big reasons.

  • it's a cosmic felony

  • causing improbable events creates a new timeline which increases entropy in all probable realities, which can have some drastic (and usually negative) effects.

  • most time travel agencies (which is what most people can afford) use technology that doesn't actually allow for free will, that's why it's mostly sold for vacations.

    • you can alter/push some decisions, but for most people it's not gonna be successful stocks.
    • older technology was advanced calculation in a realistic simulation. Most people just wanted an old memory or to get closure. Some people just try a different meal or movie choice, the experience is all that matters.
  • time mercenaries. We're actually not sure who these guys are, but we also don't wanna know either. Some say they're who cause spontaneous combustion and embarrassing deaths.

  • most forms of actual time travel leave the user stranded, with chronic or terminal illness (and sometimes amnesia), and in some cases fading/poofing out of existence when certain thresholds are crossed.

    • On top of that, new timelines of you typically aren't experienced by you. It's a different you. So that was nice of you.
  • time spiders. You don't want to know.

[–] WetBeardHairs@lemmy.ml 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

time spiders. You don’t want to know.

They're really more crab-like than spider-like. If you bring a net back home from vacation, you can snag a few. They're delicious steamed with butter.

[–] droans@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Don't eat too many; their chroniton level is through the roof.

[–] tostiman@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

Very informative, thanks

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Oszilloraptor@feddit.de 20 points 11 months ago

Who knows if you really want to have much much wealth in the future.

Maybe he would have made the deal of his life the next week if his future me wouldn't have intervened; but 30 years later everybody that ever had more than a million gets killed by the revolutionary movement that swapped across the world after society almost collapsed due to greed.

But he managed to reach a time machine, and now he calculated that if he saves a maximum of 15% he will only ever reach 975000 bucks and therefore survive the revolution

[–] Dasnap@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Maybe they're really risk-adverse and don't trust they haven't fucked everything with the butterfly effect just by being there.

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Maybe the butterfly effect is greater than we possibly can imagine?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hark@lemmy.world 37 points 11 months ago (7 children)

Old self is greedy and wants young self to reduce the fun of their prime years by locking away money so they can sit on a big ol' retirement fund in their older years. Of course, that's assuming that past performance guarantees future results and that the conditions of the 401k will remain the same. What's to say politicians don't start applying extra taxes on 401k withdrawals? What's to say they won't increase the retirement age?

A lot of people can't spare 10-15% of their income and I'm not so sure the advice is not just a ploy by 401k fund managers to squeeze out extra fees. Maybe it's just a silly little comic and I'm taking it too seriously.

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Young Johnny should ask old Johnny why they don't simply buy a sports almanac

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Because Marty will just steal it. Duh.

[–] theragu40@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Well. I assume this guy is actually from the future. So in theory wouldn't he know that in the future 401k's have not been taxed into irrelevance? I feel like if he's coming from the future with this advice it's because he feels it's still good advice in his future.

[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

And then one day you wake up and you are that "old" person. Then you realize you're screwed: the health problems that aren't a big deal if they're treated are debilitating because you can't afford treatment. Those issues you assumed are going to kill you don't, and instead you linger for decades with a garbage quality of life.

The worst part is you aren't even that old: mentally you're still pretty much the same person you were in your 30s, just trapped in a body that's slowly falling apart and needs constant maintenance.

Yes, you need to strike a balance -- but not doing what you can to financially plan for old age is fucking stupid.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Shit ya'll are making me rethink leaving the state.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

and then those health problems turn out to be so expensive that the cost far exceeds what you can afford through your 401k anyway. I'm not saying no planning should be done, I'm saying that your planning should lean more favorably toward the present than the far future. For many, 10-15% of income is so much of a sacrifice that I'm willing to bet the payoff wouldn't be worth it in most cases.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago (11 children)

Agree a lot can't spare it. Getting to 15% is pretty tough. You can do the math though and see that even 10% will likely make it tough to maintain your current lifestyle with inflation accounted for in the absence of active cash flow. Don't forget when you have more leisure time you are more likely to find things to spend on and also reserves for health issues / other surprises is important too. Sorry to sound like a dad / investment advisor, but I don't think it's a ploy so much as the terrifying reality that most of us are under prepared for.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago (17 children)

Must be nice to have a job that does 401k matching. I had one for about a year, then boom, laid off. Back to part time work that doesn't match. 🤷‍♂️

[–] Very_Bad_Janet@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago

I don't have a match but I still save in my pretax retirement account. If you don't have any available to you through your employer, please look into a Traditional or Roth IRA.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 months ago (4 children)
[–] blackbelt352@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (3 children)

So if you have a 401(k) you agree to have part of your paycheck go to a fund and your employer matches however much you put in up to a certain percent. It helps get around some taxes when you eventually pull the money out for retirement.

Originally it was supposed to be a supplement for pensions but pensions meant less profits because they need to be fully funded, so over the years big corporations pushed 401(k)s as an alternative to pensions because they can just push that responsibility onto us.

[–] xylogx@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

A defined benefit pension puts market risks on the company. A 401k puts the market risk on the individual.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 9 points 11 months ago

The employer matching is definitely not always a thing

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hark@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

It's like an RRSP.

[–] GoneWrong@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As a Warhammer fan, I’m telling you it is wild.

[–] Kyoyeou@slrpnk.net 3 points 11 months ago (4 children)

It's even further than 40k when the T'AU empire have saved the world obviously

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheBest@midwest.social 9 points 11 months ago

this thread calls out to all the real adults on Lemmy lol. actually learning so much.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 9 points 11 months ago (3 children)

He should have come back with winning lottery ticket numbers and sports outcomes

[–] ILurkAndIKnowThings@lemmy.ml 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That happened in the previous loop. This time-traveller ruined his life with hookers and blow, so instead of giving his younger self quick riches, he gave solid financial advice instead.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

Yeah, future him is a fucking moron.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 11 months ago (5 children)

What company let's you put a full 15% into a 401k? I mean... sign me up.

[–] psivchaz@reddthat.com 25 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Generally you can put in as much as you want but they only provide matching for some percentage. Usually like 1-5%. There is a total contribution limit but that won't affect most people.

[–] Trollception@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

You can put in a max of 22,500 per year. The employer contribution can be higher.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The limits on 401k contributions are federally regulated and are set as a nominal amount.

Employers often have employees select a percentage of their income to contribute, and for very high income earners, 15% might be over the federal limit. Also, employers can match employee 401k contributions. That is usually a percentage match of annual salary up to a given limit (e.g. 2% of salary up to $3000).

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

You can put in however much you want, the company only matches up to a certain low percent though. Typically less than 5%. I personally put 17% of my income into my 401k since I didn’t do anything for about a decade that I should’ve been doing 10% and now I’m trying to catch up, company only matches 3%

[–] raptir@lemdro.id 4 points 11 months ago

Any company that pays you less than $150,000.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mrcleanup@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

It turns out if you save that 10% instead of giving it to the church you might not be destitute when you retire. Or you can buy the church for assistance and see how that goes.

[–] InternetTubes@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Good plan, temporal instability tends to make things like giving yourself a list of winning lottery numbers butterfly effect out into ways that have unintended consequences. Tends to make the list meaningless short after as well, too.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

"Come on, you couldn't have brought a Grays Sports Almanac from the future or something?"

load more comments
view more: next ›