this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
571 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19138 readers
5938 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Elliott@lemmy.world 142 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lauren Boebert needed 4 tries to pass a GED. She's the perfect representation of the Republican party now.

[–] Cruxifux@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] chaogomu@kbin.social 76 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Failed it three times, finally succeeded at the age of 34, just a few months before the election that put her in the House.

She also married a (somewhat rich) sex offender. But has now divorced him in favor of a guy who was groping her in the theater she was kicked out of. She was also giving him a handy.

[–] Specific_Skunk@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (4 children)

A suggested edit:

But has now divorced him in favor of a Democrat-aligned LGBTQ-supporting, drag show-hosting bar owner who was groping her in the theater she was kicked out of. She was also giving him a handy.

This brings me joy and I want to make sure her support network is fully aware of it.

A link to what I’m sure is a trustworthy source: https://www.tampafp.com/colorado-rep-boebert-apologizes-for-theater-behavior-now-faces-questions-on-boyfriends-background/

[–] OrangeJoe@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Like, I agree with you. But you know her supporters either don't care or will come up with some crazy way to justify it.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Of course she should give him a handy in a theater! Women exist as sexual objects to serve men at all times! It would have been morally wrong for her to not have greased his pole!

Western slope Republicans, probably.

[–] akai@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

They'll probably say that a filthy Democrat was fondling her...

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I love that she was jerking him off in the theater, like she was some kind of raunchy teen from the 50s or something, and not, you know, a 36 year old grandmother.

[–] DeanFogg@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That should have been the headline. 36 y/o grandma Lauren Bobhead jacks boyfriend off in theater

[–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Should have, but there's no teeth in Liberal media.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] vind@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

They will use that as a way to claim that he is the one 'corrupting' her sexually...

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It is amusing to think that they would not drop her for so many other things (vaping in public, groping in public, being a complete Karen in public), but associating with a Democrat ? That's a bridge too far, buddy!

[–] torknorggren@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought the sex offender wasn't remotely rich until he mysteriously landed some sweetheart contract a couple months before Bobo was elected.

[–] jscummy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I think he might have been an oil worker of some sort which are usually pretty well paid. The real money comes from his $500k/yr oil "consulting" job he got after she was elected, and is definitely qualified for

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

he also owns a LGBTQ bar or club which she claims to be against.

On May 31, Boebert claimed children at a North Carolina school were being taught colors from an "LGBT flag flashcards with a pregnant man," adding: "We went from Reading Rainbow to Randy Rainbow in a few decades, but don't dare say the Left is grooming our kids!"

On June 6 she said: "Take your children to CHURCH, not drag bars."

On August 18, Boebert tweeted a photograph showing an advert for a "Drag Queen Story Hour," hosted in a public library.

She added: "Sending a message to all the drag queens out there: stay away from the children in Colorado's Third District!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nao@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I was reading another thread and wondering who she was

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 82 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Hilarious. You could do better than Biden, America, but I respect this reaction more than the incessant screaming of the toddler you had before.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be honest, neither Biden nor any other politician should receive praise or respect for behaving this way, for it is the bare minimum that's expected from them.

We're just used to the craziness of the other side. Anyone behaving like the Republicans during the GW Bush era or earlier would have been ostracized from the political landscape.

So, don't feel respect for the expected decency of a politician. Feel rage for the indecent one, and show it with your votes!

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I would, but I’m Canadian.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Clearly Bidens son Hunter has issues and has done some clearly shady, if not outright illegal things, but this does not immediately make Biden complicit in his son's actions. Anyone who can read or has eyes will realize this all theater and will go nowhere just like the Clinton investigations.

[–] a_baby_duck@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the entire point is to smokescreen and deligitimize Trump's legal situation by trying to show people "look, we're doing the same thing they are doing to us!" Doesn't matter if it's completely different, or if it even goes anywhere legally. A lot of people will either not take the time to follow both cases or they'll be disenfranchised enough to tune out altogether, which is exactly what they're hoping for.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Look what they did to Hillary. They created so much smoke about Benghazi people still think there was a fire.

Truly the fall of civilization is when a critical mass of people don't know how to think critically and believe only what the angry people tell them.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

...which managed to peel just enough voters off to make donnie's bid for office in 2016 a possibility that actually happened.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 37 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I do love his approach but it would also be neat to see him talk the same shit trump did and blame the republikkkans for a witch hunt. Which is exactly what they are doing. I also really wish he would have the trump children investigated as thoroughly as his son and Hillary have been.

[–] Shanedino@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I feel that would validate the republican clown show too much.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Yep. They go out of their way to make words lose meaning. Notice after Jan 6 they've been labeling anything dems do as an "insurrection." It's so their base sees anything horrendous that Republicans do as tit for tat, and the dumbass enlightened centrists can say "bOtH sIdEs" as they do.

Saying "OK go for it you got nothing" is much better optically.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Yes but also every accusation is a confession with them, they’re screaming about a laptop while handing out security clearances to their kids and quietly funneling Saudi money all over. Let’s look at that more publicly

[–] solstice@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

I've been saying that since W was in office. Dems failure to call out the republicans shenanigans is endlessly frustrating.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 3 points 1 year ago

Honestly he spends his time better than all of that.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 year ago

I can only hope, by the time I'm 80, that I give as many negative fucks as Biden.

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 20 points 1 year ago

Special good luck to those Republican Reps who come from districts Biden won. You are those that will get attention.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 18 points 1 year ago

Impeachment is an empty threat at this point. He might not even show up if it goes to trial.

[–] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm glad he responded to this. But I wish he would've hit harder. Shame doesn't work with the current GOP.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I disagree. I think he's better off doing his job competently than engaging in GOP tabloid headline generators.

[–] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That's also a fair point.

[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If the Republicans held Trump to the same standards as they're trying to hold Biden to, Donald would have been ousted from office and not cleared of two attempted impeachments.

Because on a scale of 1 to the Trump dynasty, Hunter's wrongdoing is about a 3.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

"Good luck with that fellas, let me know how that goes for ya!"

load more comments
view more: next ›