this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
199 points (88.7% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35383 readers
1160 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Screenshot_20230907-124802_Eternity_1_1

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 125 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They are technically correct except google is adsense .. the ad market place.

So technically they are not correct, and factually they are not correct, an effectively they are not correct. Sounds like they are wrong

[–] ElPussyKangaroo@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

You had me in the first half, ngl

[–] gamey@feddit.rocks 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quaks like a duck it might just be a duck!

[–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Influencers don’t wear lipstick . They wear KillerPout LadyEmulsion (click the link )

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't for get to like and subscribe!

[–] bert@lemmy.monster 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Smash that button! Smash it!

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And don't forget today's sponsor: Nord VPN!!! (save 15% by using the affiliate link. It really helps the channel out.)

[–] elvith@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Before we continue this comment chain, a quick shout out to our sponsor „Microtransactions: The Game“. You think this game might be fake like all those other games from the other ads you see. But no! This game is real. It’s completely honest. It’s exactly what it promises! Download now for free - no other game will drain your wallet like this one does!

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Nice! Did I forget to mention that I have a Patreon, too? Patrons get access to behind the scene content, bonus videos, and a chance to chat with me in an upcoming Q&A! Link below!

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 year ago

but when you put lipstick on it!

Viola! Now its an Influencer.

[–] tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk 78 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'd argue some magazines are basically ad pushers wrapped around a thin layer of minimum effort articles.

Hell, most of them, when I think about it.

Google, though.. ads are their core business.

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Ad publishing platform. They don’t make the ad, that’s the ad company but they are distributors.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

I agree about magazines being ad pushers. And they have the balls to charge $10+ for the "content".

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago (3 children)

He doesn’t know that Google powers ads across the web? Yeesh.

[–] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago

I am heavily invested into Google (my music, much of my bought series/movies, email, Google drive, Keep, Android, Chrome) and of course Google is a fucking ad company.

[–] gamey@feddit.rocks 6 points 1 year ago

Across the web and byond!

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

He does. He compared that to a magazine. Did you not understand the point?

[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Magazines aren't involved ads in places other than their magazine. Google powers ads placed on websites that are not owned by Google. The equivalent would be something like Time being responsible for random billboards.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago

The OOP would be right if Google made all/most of its money from ads on Search and YouTube. They'd be a search and video company that makes its money through advertising. That's the correct analogy to magazines.

But Google also acts as a broker selling ads to entirely unrelated websites. That's what makes them an advertising company.

[–] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

So, you think the argument of "they can't be a doctor as they are a swimmer" is a good argument? Obviously you can be 2 things.

But even then: The problem is that it is ignorant to Google's business model. Google is not simply hosting ads in their products as a form of revenue. Google makes 11% of it's revenue by tracking and hosting ads on other Plattforms. The person calling google an ad company, obviously makes the point that google has a major interest in ads and tracking. 11% of your total revenue is a lot of money to have motivation for having a major interest in ads and tracking. (Btw. This is ignoring the ad revenue that they make on their own properties like YouTube. Which also benefits from the tracking of users on other site. In other words, google has even more of an interest in it then just 11%, in fact 80% of it's revenue is ads and tracking. But I want to focus on the "what is different from a magazine" part)

In other words, you can be both. Magazines can be an ad company too. And highlighting Google's interest in ads because 80% of their revenue is from ads and 11% from providing ads to other sites, is hardly wrong if talking about Google's relationship with ads.

[–] kingcarlosxiii@lemmy.ca 50 points 1 year ago

Confidently Incorrect…

[–] yoz@aussie.zone 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] gamey@feddit.rocks 2 points 1 year ago

You hit the nail on the head with that one!

[–] ElPussyKangaroo@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Ah yes. Google Adsense is just a myth.

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

The one thing that really sets it as an ad company is that there is no customer service unless it’s for ads publishing.

[–] Mugmoor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah I'd have to disagree in that statement entirely. TV Stations are ad companies. It isn't shows with commercials every now and then, it's the other way around.

And have you read a Magazine in the last 30 years? They're entirely ads, including sponsored content.

[–] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Community and publicly owned stations are still content with ads to support, but that's a minority.

[–] Izzy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I dream of an ad free future.

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd agree if Google were just serving ads from a different source, but since they're serving ads that they themselves source they are an ad company.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Google serves ads for google?

Google AdSense serves ads for Google yes.