this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
361 points (98.1% liked)

politics

18284 readers
4854 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

When former president Donald Trump’s media start-up announced in October 2021 that it planned to merge with a Miami-based company called Digital World Acquisition, the deal was an instant stock-market hit.


With the $300 million Digital World had already raised from investors, Trump Media & Technology Group, creator of the pro-Trump social network Truth Social, pledged then that the merger would create a tech titan worth $875 million at the start and, depending on the stock’s performance, up to $1.7 billion later.


All they needed was for the merger to close — a process that Digital World, in a July 2021 preliminary prospectus, estimated would happen within 12 to 18 months.

“Everyone asks me why doesn’t someone stand up to Big Tech? Well, we will be soon!” Trump said in a Trump Media statement that month.


Now, almost two years later, the deal faces what could be a catastrophic threat. With the merger stalled for months, Digital World is fast approaching a Sept. 8 deadline for the merger to close and has scheduled a shareholder meeting for Tuesday in hopes of getting enough votes to extend the deadline another year.


If the vote fails, Digital World will be required by law to liquidate and return $300 million to its shareholders, leaving Trump’s company with nothing from the transaction.


For Digital World, it would signal the ultimate financial fall from grace for a special purpose acquisition company, or SPAC, that turned its proximity to the former president into what was once one of the stock market’s hottest trades. Its share price, which peaked in its first hours at $175, has since fallen to about $14.



Digital World’s efforts to merge with Trump Media have been troubled almost from the start, beset by allegations that it began its conversations with the former president’s company before they were permitted under SPAC rules.


Then, in the past year, its issues became more pronounced: Its chief executive was terminated by the board, a former board member was arrested on charges of insider trading, and the company agreed to pay an $18 million settlement to resolve charges that it had misled investors and given false information to the Securities and Exchange Commission.


The merger has “been pretty much unprecedented in terms of all of the glitches,” said Jay Ritter, a University of Florida finance professor who studies stock markets. “The deal does seem to be running out of time. You can’t just keep getting extensions forever.”


top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 104 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Hold on.....

You mean to tell me that a Trump deal was shady from the start, a whole bunch of people involved in it are under investigation and facing criminal charges, and in the end a whole bunch of people are going to lose their shirts and another business will go bankrupt?

Surely you jest! This has never happened with any of Trump's transactions before!!!!!

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 44 points 11 months ago

He posted his mugshot on Twitter. He knows he can't stay away forever. It calls to him like a siren.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.ml 33 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Everything this guy touches turns to shit. Somehow he escapes himself.

[–] sickday@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The Midas Touch of Shit at it again

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Mierda's Touch!

[–] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

That would make him an Excremental.

[–] danielton@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 2 points 11 months ago

You never heard about all his business failures? The guy is just too full of himself to admit that he ever failed.

[–] clutch@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

Amazing how he has not been killed by a disgruntled business partner or investor yet

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Good and bad. Good because it is another public failure for Trump. Bad, because those idiots will now flood Twitter / X and reach even more gullible people with their lies.

[–] danielton@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 25 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Elon doesn't pay his bills either. Who knows how long his site will last.

[–] bloopernova@programming.dev 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't twitter have a bunch of debt it has to repay each year?

[–] danielton@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 4 points 11 months ago

Yup. I think it got worse when Elon bought it.

[–] athos77@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

Elon will be more than delighted to host him. :/

[–] MrJukes@lemmy.one 29 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] icepuncher69@sh.itjust.works 27 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Honestly its not asgood of a news because that would mean that the MAGA nuters are just gonn go flocking everywhere else. Thrut social imo was kinda like a containment chamber for those specific types of people, like you wouldnt see a tankie or any one in the liberal spectrum going there, hell probably not even democrats, it was exclusively for the MAGA croud, and no one else. Now we are gonna have a bunch of those nutters back into social media shooting their poison. I just hope they dont get into lemmy.

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

They'll follow the cult leader back to twitler where they belong.

[–] TechyDad@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Hopefully, that will accelerate everyone else moving off of X/Twitter and onto alternatives.

[–] icepuncher69@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago

Lets hope so

[–] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 8 points 11 months ago

Probably better to have them dispersed rather than concentrated in their own little fission reactor.

[–] Gonkulator@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[–] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 27 points 11 months ago (2 children)

"No reasonable person believes that a Twitter clone just for conservatives is a viable business any more" is what the Parler team said.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 6 points 11 months ago

Especially now Twitter is just that.

[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 months ago

any more

Wow.

[–] Cheekyw443@discuss.online 22 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This was a sketchy deal from the outset. Why would anyone think a new social media company could be successful. Twitter wasn’t even making a profit when Elon bought it - who would invest $300 million not only to try it again - but to only target less than half the people the other platform targeted.

Just a bad business decision no matter how you slice it.

[–] CryptoRoberto@sh.itjust.works 11 points 11 months ago

Twitter became profitable for the first time in 2018 when it reported its first-ever net income of $1.2 billion for that year. This was followed by a second consecutive year of profitability in 2019, with total revenue of $3.4 billion and a net income of $1.4 billion, which was higher than expected by many analysts.

Twitter was making money before Elon bought it... The numbers that get thrown around now about how much money it's losing are because Elon saddled the company with the debt from his leveraged buyout. The insane yet somehow legal strategy of making the company payback the loan for it's own purchase.

[–] obvs@talk.macstack.net 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oh, no, such a shame. Wherever will their five users go now?

[–] Exec@pawb.social 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 11 points 11 months ago
[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 18 points 11 months ago

The investors are all about to receive honorary degrees from Trump University.

[–] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 14 points 11 months ago

This is the least surprising news I’ve heard all day. But it’s very funny!

[–] Chozo@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago

Watch the users somehow find a way to blame "woke left cancel culture" for this, instead of blaming the man who famously never pays his bills.

[–] ScornForSega@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Whoa, hang on guys. This doesn't mean Truth Social is over, it just means the SPAC deal that was going to take it public might fall through.

If this fails, then they'll need some venture capital to keep running, and if that fails, then it'll be time to shut down.

[–] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

There's a good chance Putin can scrape together another shell company with some phantom money and promise to pay everything off, thus restarting the clock.

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Kbin has the best thumbnail replacements for the Washington Post, I swear.

[–] amonali@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If anyone is interested check out The Wandering Inn. I was confused as to how Erin (the main protagonist) related to Trump lol

[–] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

This looks dope, thanks for sharing! if you wanna rave and ramble about all the ways it's good I'm down to listen! Maybe it will help me convince a friend to start it with me too lol. Or motivate me to stick with it.

[–] amonali@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's one of my favorite web serials of all time. Have you ever wanted to read a story and wished it never ended because it's so good? Try the Wandering Inn! Still going strong even after 9 million words. I started it during the Covid lockdown 2 years ago and was enraptured by it for a few months. The story is an isekai (people from our world transported to a different one) in a fantasy world where people gain levels and skills like an RPG. Has inspirations from The Lord of the Rings, DnD, anime, and other nerdy stuff.

[–] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm so sold!!!! Thank you! And sorry one more question but when you say isekai, it's not in the like male insertion/sexual fantasy way is it? Sorry it can be such a general genre (imo) wanna steer clear of that particular flavor of it lol.

[–] amonali@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

No it is not. The main character is female. And she's just a normal girl before being transported to a different world and becoming an innkeeper. Not a Mary Sue as well but she's really good at chess which is like her main thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] root_beer@midwest.social 5 points 11 months ago

You love to see it

[–] FARTYSHARTBLAST@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Is there a single word to describe the opposite of shocked?

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 5 points 11 months ago (7 children)
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago

I'm not plussed in the slightest.

[–] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I hate this word because its actual meaning is to be surprised and confused, and people use it more and more often to mean basically the opposite (I assume because the “non” makes “nonplussed” sound like a lack of something), and now the word’s two meanings coexist in opposition of each other, and I just have to use everything else to determine which meaning it is supposed to be.

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

When people use it a certain way more and more, you can expect that to become the default meaning. When the scenario is people vs dictionary, you can expect the people to win. After all, who writes the dictionary?

[–] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

My point is that I hate it because we are smack dab in the middle of the transition, where it’s very unsettled which meaning has won out.

I’m neither confused about how a word’s meaning can evolve nor am I arguing that it shouldn’t happen. (In fact, I think language change is very cool.) I just think this word is sitting in a particularly awkward place at this moment in time that makes it very annoying. It’s an aesthetic opinion of sorts.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] sugarfree@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Does anyone even know a single Truth Social user?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] helloharu@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

What a shame /s

load more comments
view more: next ›