this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
796 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59092 readers
6622 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fubo@lemmy.world 125 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

What baffles me about this whole situation is McDonald's (corporate) role in perpetuating it. It doesn't make sense as a way to squeeze money from the franchises, because the extracted rents¹ don't go to corporate; it goes to Taylor. It's a loss to the franchisee, and no benefit to McDonald's central.

This smells of graft. Someone at McDonald's corporate is getting paid off illicitly.


¹ In the political-economy sense of "rent", not the one that means "lease payment".

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Someone at McDonald's corporate is getting paid off illicitly.

By the rules of and values Corpmurica, that executive is just acting out of rational self-interest.

Isn't our society in favor of fucking over anyone we can for individual profit? Isn't that what we're taught by example to do, lest we be considered an un-American commie?

You can bribe our politicians legally with infinite sums of money to PACs since Citizens United, you think anyone gives a shit about bribing a McDonald's executive?

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Huh? By the rules and values of Corporate America, breaching your employer's trust by taking kickbacks from a contractor would be solidly against the rules.

My suspicion is that McDonald's corporate is not making as much money as it could be, because franchisees are paying Taylor for fake repairs instead of buying more shitty ice cream mix from corporate.

This is not a matter of Good vs Evil. It's one Lawful Evil group getting ripped off by another.

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

breaching your employer's trust

Oh yes, harumph I say! Multinational corporations are as honorable as they are trustworthy, and demand that very same honor and integrity from their executive team in their scrupulous business practices, I say!

Honestly though, do you think sociopathic multinationals like McDonald's have a leg to stand on expecting not to attract people that reflect their lack of values? Garbage attracts garbage. Unrepentant Garbage deserves to suffer garbage.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't claim to have a solution but one thing that has always bugged me about this. When I award contracts or buy pretty much anything I can't take a bribe of money, but I can take a bribe of effort. It is acceptable for me (I did have this conversation more than once) to straight off tell a salesperson I can go higher on price if they agree to keep prices constant so I don't have to constantly look at them. Or if they agree to do some other time saving measure.

[–] Aloha_Alaska@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I upvoted you because I don’t award contracts, so I have no idea if that’s common practice but I hope your comment gets some visibility and discussion. It’s quite interesting to think about the value of our time or effort and how maximizing those isn’t a bribe, it’s just common sense.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Your boss asks you to go to the store to buy something, I don't know a flashlight. You can go to the store that is further away and get a lower price of the store very close and pay more.

For some reason this is different than if a flashlight sales person offereded you money to buy their flashlight.

Bribes of time are fine bribes of money aren't.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This smells of graft.

It IS graft. I've forgotten where I ran into the information but someone tracked it down. Taylors (the machine company) has an exclusive contract with McDonald's Corporate for the machines and McDonald's Corporate receives a portion of the service revenue whenever a Taylor machine is "fixed".

That's why McDonald's is fighting Kytch / helping Taylor.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Executives who run McDonalds likely also own shares in Taylor. Just like they have a financial interest in paper straws.

[–] nous@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is also no loss for McDonald's central, but they have a old and close business relationship with Taylor that they seem to care about more than their own franchise owners.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

It hurts the brand immeasurably, how is that not a loss? Not only does it annoy customers, it causes them to go to other franchises instead. That decreases the value of their franchise, which directly hurts the company.

Long trip, daughter wants an ice cream, I am hungry, pull off the highway and go towards McDonald's, then remember their ice cream machine is probably broken so I go to Wendy's instead. Realize they are running their biggie bag promotion and get like 2 meals worth of food and an Ice cream for like 7 bucks... Why would I go to McDonald's again for fast food if I have the option?

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, the company was taken over by a milkshake machine seller.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

What a Kroc.

[–] krayj@sh.itjust.works 86 points 1 year ago (4 children)

There's already a link to the vid talking about the utter bullshit and corruption surrounding the McD's ice cream machines posted in this thread, but here's a resource I haven't seen posted yet: an online tracker to find out if your local McD's ice cream machine is working or broken right now.

https://mcbroken.com/

(love the domain name)

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

I swear that site makes green dots smaller until they disappear when you zoom out. Still pretty cool though, our nearest McDonalds has a broken ice cream machine

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] XTornado@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] krayj@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

They reverse engineered the ordering API (that the app uses) and try to add a McSundae to an online order. If the ice cream machine is broken, it won't let you add that item to an order for the specific location. If the McSundae machine is working, it will let you add that item to the order for the designated location.

It updates each location every 30 minutes, so is very up to date.

More details about it here: https://hypebeast.com/2020/10/mcbroken-site-mcdonalds-ice-cream-machines-working-tracker-info

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

If its the one I know, it sends an online ice cream request through the API, and then cancels the successful ones before they reach the stores. The unsuccessful ones are broken machines, essentially.

[–] nathanielcwm@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

iirc it used to get it through a reverse engineering of the McDonald's app api. Not sure about now tho

[–] LagDrake@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Why is there some countries without thoses (e.g. Spain, France, Italy...) ?

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 84 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hey, kids! Do you want to play a game? Its called "Everyone In Any Position of Power is Corrupt!"

I freaking hate this game, when can we play something else :(

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can you explain the rules? This game kinda sounds like it sucks.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can you explain the rules?

Here you go! The Rules for Rulers

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 5 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/rStL7niR7gs

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

Well if you win ya get a free guillotine!

[–] tesfabpel@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago (1 children)

BTW, fixing broken machines' software (printers) was how Richard Stallman got so frustrated to invent the GPL license...

[–] Asymptote@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 year ago

Imagine being the guy who wrote so buggy software that you inadvertently saddled the entire world with rms

[–] atticus88th@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Superior Court of Alameda County is charging roughly $1 per page to get legal filings. To download the entirety of the court proceedings to date, the court wants $2,999.

Alright, fuck it! Lets build our own soft serve ice cream machines... with blackjack and hookers.

[–] dmmeyournudes@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Okay, and then you get fined for violating your franchise contract that requires you use these machines.

[–] db2@sopuli.xyz 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

As a result of these shenanigans by Taylor and on their behalf McDonald's itself I haven't considered McDonald's a viable place to go for any kind of ice cream or ice cream-adjacent thing for many years, whereas this was once not the case. I know I'm not the only one either.

[–] Coeus@coeus.sbs 15 points 1 year ago

I haven't even thought about getting McDonald's ice cream in years just because it seems like they are never able to serve it so I'm not even going to try. When I want ice cream I'll go to the place that make ice cream on a cold slab.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] wick@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pretty sure they explicitly do not want legislators to think they will "hack" them. Is this article shillin' for Taylor?

[–] NotYourSocialWorker@feddit.nu 14 points 1 year ago (6 children)

You probably already know but hacking originally meant to modify a machine for instance (or furniture as in ikea hacks) but it really is a word one should avoid when speaking with people who aren't part of the communities that use it in its original meaning.

[–] chinpokomon@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Hacker vs. cracker. Hack isn't a nefarious term, or at least it shouldn't be. Hacking is just using something in an unintended way. The problem is with how DMCA made that am illegal thing to do if there was a digital lock. While intended to mean you can't bypass CSS to rip movies from DVDs, it's been used to block the right to repair and other things completely anti-consumer. But you probably know this.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I watched a youtube deep dive into this, the corruption is insane.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

mcdonalds is somehow profiting from this, or it just wouldnt be happening.

[–] wjrii@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From the article: "A DMCA exemption would allow McDonald’s franchises to legally do repair work on their own machines."

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Wait, copyright can be used to prevent repairs? What is the justification? Is it a "ice cream machine company owns the copyright to mcdonalds ice cream and if you tamper with the machine you can't call it McDonald's ice cream anymore" kind of deal or is tampering straight up illegal?

[–] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The DMCA criminalizes the act of circumventing an access control, whether or not there is actual infringement of copyright itself.

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This only applies to digital access controls right? Otherwise those 'warranty void if removed' stickers would be legal

[–] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 4 points 1 year ago

I think there needs to be a digital component but it can still apply to physical goods. Either way, “warranty void if removed” stickers aren’t a control. It only applies to “effective” controls:

For the DMCA, circumvention means that there is a user attempting to “descramble a scrambled work, to decrypt an encrypted work, or otherwise to avoid, bypass, remove, deactivate, or impair a technological measure, without the authority of the copyright owner” – assuming that there is a technological measure in place that “effectively controls access to a work.”

If you need to reverse engineer the product to bypass the access control, then that generally qualifies as an effective control. But if you can just press F12 or Escape or remove a sticker, that wouldn’t qualify as effective.

(For what it’s worth I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Taylor must pay McDonald’s a tidy sum for the exclusivity contract. Both parties make out like bandits in the deal. I’m kind of surprised McDonald’s never in-housed it out of greed, but that day may be coming due to all the negative publicity.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ericisshort@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

More likely someone at McDonalds than the company itself.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Id blow them up and buy one from a reliable source...

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 5 points 1 year ago

McDonald's Franchisee's can't buy anything other than these specific machines from Taylor. They can't even buy the machines that Taylor sells to other chains like Wendy's!

load more comments
view more: next ›