this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
438 points (97.8% liked)

News

22901 readers
4037 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Changetheview@lemmy.world 104 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This doesn’t fix everything, but perfection is the enemy of progress. This is worth celebrating if you care about non-wealthy Americans.

In the face of overzealous judicial rulings and zero help from Congress, this policy helps over 800,000 struggling, older Americans resolve long standing debt that they made payments on for 20 or 25 years.

These aren’t free loaders or wealthy individuals. Nor are they committing fraud to accept disaster loans aimed at keeping paychecks afloat.

They are former students. That’s it. Something that the US covers for K-12th grade as one of its earliest ground-breaking policies. The rest of the developed world took that through college, the US decided to create a bloated system of indentured servitude instead.

No, this doesn’t stop new borrowers from taking on loans. And it doesn’t stop education providers from overcharging. These are real problems that deserve attention.

But it is still a step showing that at least some federal officials care to try to resolve the issues plaguing some of those who did nothing more than try to improve their situation and gain valuable training with far reaching benefits.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Really disingenuous to even use the word freeloader In a conversation about student loans. Wanting an education isn't freeloading.

[–] iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

GI Bill students still taking loans to get through school, while working full time. Source? Am one. It's absolutely outrageous, the cost of both school and living.

[–] CouncilOfFriends@slrpnk.net 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

California had free public colleges until Reagan closed them because of Vietnam War protests. The war on woke has been fucking over everybody for a long time.

[–] Minty@lemmy.one 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

"The borrowers involved in the plans targeted for the new forgiveness include those with Direct Loans or Federal Family Education Loans held by the department, including Parent PLUS loans. Many of the borrowers affected are likely 50 or older. About 9.2 million borrowers fall into this category."

No research done outside of reading the article, but this line makes it seem like it will be mostly older people benefitting. Although the 9.2M number seems pretty high to be people mostly 50+. If that is the case, it's hardly a win for a generation most affected by student loan debt.

Steps are great and all, and I would never argue against a step in the right direction. However, at some point, we need to raise the bar of expectation on federal officials past the smallest step of advancement reasonably possible. At this point we've heard how "we're taking steps towards true universal healthcare" for some voters entire lives and while many, tiny, steps of advancement have been made we're not too much closer to the goal being sold to us.

Long ramble short, If people are content with just a step and not a solution, even an advancing step, the government will try and wait out this issue for as long as possible. It's not unjust to demand more given their history.

[–] Changetheview@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I hear you. Much bigger steps are needed and hopefully the younger generations who have been priced out of housing, hit with insanely low wage growth, and took out student loans to cover much higher education costs will start to obtain benefits sooner rather than later. They deserve it.

[–] Sami_Uso@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It doesn't help me, my wife or anyone that I personally know in my peer group. No, it's not nothing but it's not at all what we meant when we asked for it and it's certainly not enough. It is just enough, however, to say "well, we tried" and add this onto their list of accomplishments for the upcoming election.

I'm getting pretty tired of having to settle for literal scraps because the Democrats "tried really hard".

[–] baru@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm getting pretty tired of having to settle for literal scraps because the Democrats "tried really hard".

Are you ignoring how often they were blocked by the other party?

[–] Sami_Uso@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

No, and I don't really care, either. The same people tell me to "figure it out" and "that's just the way it is", but I'm supposed to let these guys off the hook? Republicans never seem to have to make this argument about their party, why do the Democrats time and time again have to bend the knee to these idiots....they don't.

I'm just frustrated. I have been with my party for what seems like a long time now. It's always the Republicans fault, and I'm just getting a little tired of hearing it.

[–] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

What's the excuse for not having universal healthcare in places with dem super majorities like NY state ?

[–] Fester@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I am literally banking on the 20-year IBR forgiveness not being fucked up in the next 15 years. There is no way I’ll pay the loans off at this rate, especially with the interest. The loan terms should be locked in as a worst-case scenario, at least, including forgiveness. These political games are ridiculous.

Now it will be interesting to see if these borrowers are hit with “tax bombs” upon forgiveness. If the forgiven amount is treated as income, like usual on debt forgiveness, it could mean they owe taxes on it come April next year. What are the chances that someone who’s been on an IBR plan has ~$20,000 in cash to pay a tax bill?

[–] Changetheview@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You’re absolutely not alone. Not by a long shot.

Many PPP loans were forgiven without being considered taxable income, so there is precedent and there are many excellent arguments in favor of applying this for students who successfully paid income-based payments for literally decades.

Hopefully progress against this incredibly dysfunctional system will keep happening. Would be nice to give the non-wealthy Americans a better chance at home ownership, retirement savings, and other crucial financial progress. Rather than just saddling them with federal debt while taxes are slashed for the wealthy.

[–] mjhelto@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

As a millennial, I've all but given up on seeing any meaningful change in what remains of my life. I'm tired of living on hopeium that boomers will get the fuck out of positions of power so some of the very obvious lies the wealthy told them, of which was regurgitated and believed by them and us, can start to be fixed. They lied about everything from going to college to get a better job, to the TWO, "once in a generation" economic crashes, to the over-bloated military industrial complex, to a botched global pandemic, to the gaslighting about fossil fuels and global warming, I'm done. I just try find candidates and causes that seem to genuinely want change and throw what little extra money my wife and I have at them.

My hope is that the Gen-Z kids continue to not give a fuck about shaking up the system and use their superior knowledge of technology to finally out these dinosaurs in Congress and enact some real change. I just don't have any fight left in me, especially after COVID and the very obvious lies being told, to our face this time, that COVID was no big deal, all so some wealthy boomer could eat in a restaurant and get their hair done.

I see this attitude reflected in many of my peers, too. It's a generational burnout on life, and the best I can muster is to throw support behind those with fight left in them.

I'm tired of being tired, ya'll...

[–] evatronic@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Part of the American Rescue Plan specifically exempts amounts forgiven through 2025 -- https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/1319/text

Section 9675 (a):

 `(5) Special rule for discharges in 2021 through 2025.--
 Gross income does not include any amount which (but for this 
 subsection) would be includible in gross income by reason of the 
 discharge (in whole or in part) after December 31, 2020, and 
 before January 1, 2026, of--

... blah blah federal college loans only. But the jist is, no, there's no "tax bomb", that's a red herring.

[–] stealthnerd@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well they wouldn't so they'd end up having to setup a payment plan with the IRS but that would still be better than the debt load. I'd rather owe 20k to the IRS than 100K in fed loans. At the end of the day it's all money owed to Uncle Sam.

Personally though, I wouldn't bank on IBR, I'd much rather consolidate my loans privately at a better rate and pay them off as quick as possible rather than pay a high interest rate to the fed in hopes that they forgive it one day. I understand that's not an option for everyone though and some value the risk/reward differently.

[–] Changetheview@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

You’re not wrong that private consolidation is great for those who can afford it, and I can see you acknowledge this doesn’t work for everyone. You seem quite reasonable about it.

But one of the biggest pain points for the entire student loan crisis is specifically those who truly can’t afford to get out of their debt.

For these struggling Americans, IBR plans aren’t being used as a savvy financial decision. It’s a lifeline. If that’s stripped from them, you’d see another wave of people who can’t afford basic necessities like housing. It’s sad that it even needs to be an option. And worse that for many, there’s no easy way out.

[–] PatFussy@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Ive just come to terms that my student loans is just another tax

[–] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Next stop, free education.

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But how will we pay the poor, starving admins?!

[–] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Education will never be zero cost but it can be zero price.

[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

We all benefit when everyone has access to higher education.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Note that Biden, for the second time on student debt, acted unilaterally.

He doesn't need Congress to discharge all student debt.