this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
469 points (95.0% liked)

politics

19090 readers
5300 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Mediamatter.org

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] athos77@kbin.social 115 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

Some reich-winger's tweet quoted in the article:

There has been no claim that this individual fired on FBI agents, or even that he was armed at the time of the fatal altercation today. Apparently a giant squad of militarized personnel was incapable of apprehending a 75 year old man without gunning him down on his doorstep.

In Buffalo, a 75 year old man who was trying to turn in lost property; the police shoved him to the ground so hard that he was bleeding from his head, but they just stepped over his body. Breonna Taylor was sleeping when cops raided the wrong apartment. Charles Kinsey was shot lying facedown in the street with his hands in the air while trying to protect his autistic patient.

They're fine with all the other "poor outcome" police shootings in this country, they only get upset and fearful when one of "their own" is shot.

[–] Vlhacs@reddthat.com 18 points 1 year ago

I bet they're the same ones that don't want body cams or investigations into excessive policing...

[–] sndmn@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Slwh47696@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just respond to them that he should've obeyed and he'd be alive

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] mo_ztt@lemmy.world 114 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This commentary is reminiscent of the radical right’s reactions to the Ruby Ridge incident of 1992, an 11-day standoff in Idaho between federal agents and the family of Randy Weaver, a Christian fundamentalist affiliated with the far-right white separatist movement. The standoff resulted in the deaths of Weaver’s wife, son, and a federal marshal.

Dude... Ruby Ridge was a big deal because the FBI shot Randy Weaver in the back while he was lifting the latch to his shed to see his son's body, and then kept shooting at him as he and his family was running back to his cabin, hitting and killing his wife while she was holding their baby. It was a huge deal for a lot of people, Randy Weaver was found not guilty of any "siege-related charges" and awarded $3 million in damages, and the DOJ extensively revised their policies as a result.

Craig Deleeuw threatened to kill the president, and then according to the FBI and I see no reason to doubt them, was pointing his weapon at the FBI when they shot him. Whatever Randy Weaver did to create the Ruby Ridge confrontation, I don't think it's fair to compare the reaction to that to the reaction to this.

[–] jscummy@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 year ago

The guy that said federal agents wouldn't dare arrest him "because they'd get a .45 in the face"? He pointed a gun at the FBI?

Say it ain't so

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 year ago

Still, the Ruby Ridge and Waco comparisons are frightening. This is where the radical right really started to emerge. There was a great podcast series that I listened to about it. Here it is: Long Shadow (Apple) or Spotify link

[–] TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Craig DeLeeuw Robertson was an American retiree from Provo, Utah who allegedly threatened online to assassinate President of the United States Joe Biden and other government officials and was subsequently shot and killed by agents of the FBI on August 9, 2023 when they attempted to execute search and arrest warrants.

He allegedly referenced the president's scheduled Thursday visit to Utah and threatened to dig out camouflage gear and a rifle.

In other posts, Robertson identifies himself as a “MAGA TRUMPER” and describes one of his rifles as a “DEMOCRAT ERADICATOR.”

The complaint included screenshots from Robertson’s profile where he threatened to shoot (New York County District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who is prosecuting a criminal case against former President Donald Trump) in a courthouse parking garage. But when FBI agents confronted Robertson, he said it was a dream, according to the complaint.

Days after FBI agents spoke with Robertson on March 19 and told him they were investigating his social media posts, Robertson started posting content addressed to the FBI itself. He often said he knew they were watching what he was posting, and that the agents who spoke to him came close to being shot.

Additional info from: https://www.sltrib.com/news/2023/08/10/what-we-know-about-provo-man/

So they didn't march in and assassinate him; they've been trying to get him to calm down since March and he still posts threats...

[–] TwoGems@lemmy.ml 55 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Far right figures will always claim this and stoke stochastic terrorism. So go vote in 2024. Actually, go vote in every local election. We got a lot of terrorism fixing to do.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is amazing how they are always the badass and victim in their own story.

Some FCC licensed corporate shill expresses a viewpoint slightly to the right of average and at the same time they are a radical freethinker truthteller who is being threatened, censored, and attacked.

Yeah buddy you arent special. You work for the man same as the rest of us. If you cross a line that costs them money they will fire you.

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

It is amazing how they are always the badass and victim in their own story.

This is fascism. Just pointing it out for everyone scrolling by. Not "everyone I hate is a Nazi". No, that contradiction is a key part of fascism. We cannot play nicely with those who aren't intent on even playing the same game.

[–] Uranium3006@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

We need to do more than just voting

[–] InternetTubes@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I mean if you make your intent of murder clear, then yes, you run the risk of authorities killing you while trying to detain you.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Projection is at the core of GOP

[–] NounsAndWords@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which makes me legitimately scared about what happens if/when they get control of the executive branch again.

[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

When, not if.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I would worry. If the Biden administration wanted you dead they would

Step 1: conduct polls on the matter

Step 2: send a begging letter to the GOP asking for permission

Step 3: open negotiations with the GOP and gives them whatever they want.

Step 4: spend ten months at Town hall meeting to convince the liberal base

Step 5: get approval from Congress

Step 6: fight the court battles

Step 7: lose in the Supreme Court when Roberts vomits all over it.

Step 8: repeat the process with a watered down version, maybe not kill me, maybe just give me a head injury and let god decide.

.....

You would be fine for at least 20 years and then get a letter saying "you are a bad person.". Not even a !

[–] PBCrisps@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

“you are a bad person.”

Nah, that's too spicy for Democrats. Their letter would accuse them of having no "shame", or "honor", as if any Republican gives a shit about those concepts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bipta@kbin.social 38 points 1 year ago

We are all domestic terrorists

It explains their concern...

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 35 points 1 year ago

Orwell on Hitler:

It is a pathetic, dog-like face, the face of a man suffering under intolerable wrongs. In a rather more manly way it reproduces the expression of innumerable pictures of Christ crucified, and there is little doubt that that is how Hitler sees himself. The initial, personal cause of his grievance against the universe can only be guessed at; but at any rate the grievance is here. He is the martyr, the victim, Prometheus chained to the rock, the self-sacrificing hero who fights single-handed against impossible odds. If he were killing a mouse he would know how to make it seem like a dragon.

Like the cop who beats up his wife, then cries because she made him do it, and convinces himself he's really the victim of the whole debacle.

[–] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

well, if they’re shifting the definition of “conservative” to what others call a “domestic terrorist who made death threats against the President and then had a shootout with the FBI rather than surrender,” then yeah, they should watch out.

[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Haha the far right have been threatening to kill liberals for a few years now and are itching for an real civil war. Most of the threats I read about are made in their Telegram channels, but they all say how they're stocking up on guns and ammo and waiting for the go-ahead.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Just more projection, since conservatives have been getting away with murder openly for decades.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Whatever, they've been claiming that for years. They said the Clintons would come kill them because of Waco.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They're still really sad when Obama took all their guns back in 2012. That's why Republicans are so insecure, because they don't have any guns! The government took them all. I think they sent them to Mexico, or something.

Right??

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Don't forget Jade Helm when they knocked all the Conservatives' doors down and marched them into concentration camps that used to be Walmarts.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago

And murdered their grandparents with Obamacare.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The guy was going into detail about what it would like to see his victims dying. I haven't seen info on what exactly triggered the shooting.

One guy pointed out his age and "Why did they need all those cops?". I don't care if you are 75, you can still pull the trigger on a semi-auto gun.

[–] bemenaker@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

These are po dunk cops shooting a dog. These are FBI agents, if they shot him, he pulled a gun on them. They put him under surveillance. They approached him in public and asked to talk to him. Guy went angry old fuck on them and told them to come back with a warrant, so they did. If he was shot and killed, he brought it on himself, by his actions, that warranted being shot and killed.

[–] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

He was also taunting and threatening the FBI on his social media after he was told that they were monitoring it. Just because it's online doesn't make it not a threat. You're 100% right and I don't understand how anyone doesn't see this.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 year ago

Of course they are. Their entire political ideology is based on fear. They know their voters are cowards, and they need them to remain that way. If they can be property scared, they can be properly controlled.

[–] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

The tips to the FBI came from truth social

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Snake choked on its own tail today.

Fear mongering far right "journalists" terrifying fragile old, broken white men until they threaten the president's life constantly. Then the FBI knocks on their door in seemingly valid response and the fragile, frightened old man likely comes to the door with a loaded AR-15, a grenade belt and a blue lives matter t-shirt. His heroes in law enforcement, who are at the same time infallible super beings and complicit traitors tell him to drop the weapon, he refuses... And no more Walter.

The next day, the same fear mongering far right "journalists" tell the "story" of Walter, an innocent martyr, silenced by the JOE BRANDON!

Con artists and cowards.

What about Freedom of Speech and 2A?

Why can't I buy a ton of guns and ammo and send death threats while drawing detailed maps of each target and how I plan to commit those actions with a detailed agenda?

HOW IS THAT AGAINST THE LAW?!

[–] Buffaloaf@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Funny thing is that, purportedly, the FBI originally got a tip about him from Truth Social.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Imagine how bad it must have been overall for truth social to turn his ass in...

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Keep making direct terrorist threats and watch what happens.

[–] sic_1@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Don't tolerate the intolerant. That's how you protect democracy.

[–] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Well I mean if they are going to make these claims, who are we to disappoint them???

[–] ScrollinMyDayAway@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

But threatening to murder people online is protected by mUh FiRsT aMeNdMeNt rights!

[–] febra@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At least conservatives are acknowledging that they're terrorists

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›