this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
328 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19243 readers
2484 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

House Speaker Mike Johnson faces growing Republican dissent over his handling of government funding, potentially jeopardizing his reelection as speaker on January 3.

Allies are urging Donald Trump to reaffirm his support for Johnson to avoid a prolonged leadership fight, which could delay certification of Trump’s 2024 election victory on January 6.

Johnson’s bipartisan spending bill, criticized by Trump, narrowly averted a government shutdown but failed to include Trump’s core debt-limit demands.

Some Republicans warn that a speakerless House would disrupt critical legislative processes, including election certification.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 98 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

They could just choose Musk, Speaker of House does not have to be a member of the house.

So they could just not certify the election and they have (acting) President Musk! 🤡

Edit: Supreme court then rules an "Acting President" doesn't actually need to be a natural born citizen, since he's not technically in office. And also add "This ruling shall only apply to Elon Musk."

[–] satanmat@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah this is the kind of bs that terrifies me.

So. 20 Jan; Biden is no longer president. It would pass to the Speaker to be acting President. — and yeah I could see a few yahoos thinking that would be awesome. Ffs

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It legally couldn't pass to Musk, it would pass down to Patty Murray, the President Pro Tempore of the Senate.

"Patricia Lynn Murray is an American politician and president pro tempore of the United States Senate since 2023 and the senior United States Senator from Washington since 1993. A member of the Democratic Party, Murray served in the Washington State Senate from 1989 to 1993. She was Washington's first female U.S. senator and is the first woman in American history to hold the position of president pro tempore. Murray is also the youngest senator to occupy the office of president pro tempore in more than five decades. As president pro tempore, Murray is third in the line of succession to the U.S. presidency."

So yeah... They won't, but if they botched everything spectacularly, it would fall to a Democrat.

Edit: note it says she is the youngest in 50 years... She's 74 years old!

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 days ago

Lol don't worry, trump just joked about how Elon can't be president because he's an immigrant

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Please tell me you're not a writer for this coming season of Orange Turd in the White House.

Because I couldn't take the stress from the last season.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm sorry about that we did decide to slow things down a little this season. Elon should become Speaker in the 2027 Congress and then Trump and Vance are double impeached for corporate treason. We expect Elon's state of emergency to last about a decade before Texas votes to be annexed by Russia.

-Sincerely, Outside Dev Team

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Will we at least get quality borscht?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They're going to put Ketchup in it and claim it's TexRus.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Notice how the only good things in Texas are ones that got appropriated from other cultures.

And let's face it: take the Velveeta off TexMex, add some flavor, and what you have left is Mexican food, which is even better.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Good Tex Mex does not have Velveeta.

As long as you don't compare it to Mexican food, Tex Mex can be fucking delicious. I just look at it as a different type/ethnicity of food

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

There's a reason I used ketchup as an example. They take food from other cultures and ruin it.