prole

joined 2 months ago
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 hours ago

It's so barbaric and gross. And I guess nobody questions why their god has a fucking fetish for the skin from infants' genitals.

Totally not weird.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Hitler only became Chancellor because "moderates" were more afraid to form a coalition with leftists than allow a fascist to rise to power. Sound familiar?

If we had a parliamentary system, we would have been able to organize a much larger coalition against Trump, especially the second time around.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Beatles songs are notorious for splitting vocals to one ear only.

FYI, you're listening to the wrong mix then. Beatles albums (particularly those before The White Album, or maybe Sgt. Pepper/Magical Mystery Tour, I forget exactly) were never recorded with stereo in mind. The tech was pretty new, and the stereo mixes of those songs/albums were more of a novelty.

If you're listening to the 2009 Remasters, make sure you're listening to the mono versions if it's an album prior to 1967-1968 or so, otherwise you're gonna get this "fake stereo", panning a mono signal between L and R, bullshit.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago

I don't think it's supposed to line up "correctly" no?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago

Lysergic acid diethylamide doesn’t fix a bad mix.

I mean... Have you ever listened to "Whole Lotta Love" or "Axis: Bold as Love" while tripping balls? Those panning parts are pretty wild.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

And yet Pet Sounds (and even the contemporary stuff they originally recorded for SMiLE but never officially released) still sounds phenomenal to this day despite being in mono.

The man was a wizard.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

00s music sounds so shitty because that was when digital music first became a thing. People thought 128kbps bitrate MP3s were acceptable (until they hear that mp3 they got from KaZaa play over the PA at their wedding and realize it sounds like raccoons fighting in a trashcan).

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

This is why, when it comes to old music, I always try to listen to it the way it was originally intended.

Pet Sounds, as beautiful as it is, was originally released in mono. It was mastered to be listened to in mono, at a time when stereo was mostly just a novelty.

It wasn't until much more recently that they've taken those masters and created "real" stereo mixes from them. While they can often sound pretty good, they never quite reach the level of the best sounding mono mixes of the same material.

Just my opinion of course.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Beatles albums prior to... I want to say The White Album? Or it might have been Sgt. Pepper/Magical Mystery Tour, were recorded in mono and originally released in mono. "Stereo" versions were released ("Fake stereo" AKA recording in mono and panning it to one side or another) which are the ones that sound kinda bad imo. They were never intended to be listened in stereo other than as a novelty.

It wasn't until their later albums were they actually meant to be listened to in stereo. Eleanor Rigby, being on Revolver, was not recorded with "real" stereo mixing in mind as far as I understand it. If you're listening to the 2009 Stereo Remasters (the Box Set versions), then they were properly mixed into stereo, and sound pretty good. However, the original experience was always meant to be mono.

Though I'm sure there's some expert on this shit that knows more than me.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 hours ago

Yeah, we had stereo mixing/mastering pretty much down by the 70s I think...

What I think OP might be referring to are albums that were recorded in mono in the 60s, and then released again in stereo in the 70s when the tech only allowed for full L or R panning. Those albums were never meant to be listened in anything but mono though.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I believe that they had stereo mixing pretty figured out by the 70s...

Early-mid 60s though? Sure.

Unless you're referring to when they started mixing mono albums into stereo, then yeah. Those albums were never meant to be listened in stereo, and I wouldn't listen to a remaster of any of them unless they were officially approved by the band, or done by the band's own producer. And even then...

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 hours ago

I hate this country so much

view more: next ›