this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
664 points (94.4% liked)

196

16747 readers
1947 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] finderscult@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

If you think China is fascist, you're brainwashed. There isnt another explanation for thinking the most democratic nation currently on the planet is fascist.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

China perfectly fits the definition of a fascist ethnostate. Their economy is indirectly managed by the government while having capitalist elements (state control is the only "socialist" elements), they enforce a language, one ethnicity is clearly depicted as the "true Chinese ethnicity" (despite China having many), censorship is rampant, they're committing a genocide, and at the end of the day THEY'RE NOT EVEN SOCIALIST.

[–] finderscult@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's amazing how you neolibs expose yourselves. You sure you wouldn't be more comfortable on reddit little buddy?

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm an Anarcho-Sydicalist -_-

[–] finderscult@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Oh, you're an idealist stuck two centuries behind everyone else. Capital can and will crush everything you build through your ideology, so drop the anarcho part until capital is eliminated globally, or enjoy being a slave to capital your entire existence.

[–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

abandon your principles and become a totally-not-a-fascist™ like me, it's the only way to overthrow capitalism!!!1!!

You are deeply unserious.

[–] finderscult@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ask yourself this, how do you think your revolution, whatever revolution you think is necessary to install your ideology, is going to go 50 years after it's successful and you've been attacked constantly on all sides and from within by the enemy?

Turns out we can answer that, you won't make it 50 years, you won't make it five if you stick to principles doomed to fail.

China isn't a fascist state, they're not an imperialist state. They're an unapologetic dictatorship of the proletariat, and the only country still around that has executed billionaires, plural. Are they communist? No, no state can be communist given that statelessness is required. But they have an open democracy where all citizens can participate, a government that explicitly follows the will of the people, and an economy that favors the workers and has pulled more people out of poverty than all other economic systems combined. All without really violating human rights.

[–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

They're on unapologetic dictatorship of the proletariat…

Lol. Lmao. If the proletariat holds all the power in China, why are their wages and working conditions worse than they are in other capitalist countries? Why do they have billionaires? Why can't they join unions other than the one that's run by the state?

…they have an open democracy where all citizens can participate…

Does that include the Uyghurs? Does that include the Tibetans?

All without without really violating human rights.

You can't come up with a couple of human rights that the PRC may have violated? Not a single one. Yeah righto champ 👍

[–] DerKommissar@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Capitalism will run your defenseless little commune over and salt the earth where it stood just to spite you. Ask me how I know: what did this dogmade country do to my people's leaders? Again, and again, and again, until the closest thing we have to earnest "civil rights leaders" anymore are sitting in prison under false government slander of being foreign-backed agents?

You want to talk about "deeply unserious" and don't even have a meterstick to measure how deep in the water you are, or floaties to keep from sinking-- you clearly can't swim.

[–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If your revolution requires abandoning your principles and installing a fascistic leadership then what's the fucking point of your revolution in the first place?

[–] DerKommissar@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What "abandonment of principles"? Unless it's one of your principles to not actually fight your oppressor in any meaningful way, in which case, I consider you little more than a fetishist of martyrdom. Do-nothing.

I love how you totally ignore that this country has been locking up my people's leaders, too. What, should it be one of my 'principles' to forget that this nation is fundamentally racist towards me and mine, and will not liberate us until we as a disciplined formation and state, demand liberation at gunpoint and knife's edge?

Y'know what: since you're such an enlightened settler, you tell me how you'd secure liberation for your people in such hostile conditions to your people's comfort, safety, and self-determination.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm confused? What part of that makes you think I support capital? China literally has billionaires and factory owners, how does me pointing that out make me a capitalist?

[–] finderscult@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Reread, I never suggested you support capital, I suggested your outdated naive ideology has no chance against capital. As to your second point, reread some basic theory as to why dengism was adopted in China and how it has successfully outlasted the ussr and all other left wing movements in history while being true to its ml roots.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So my ideology doesn't stand a chance against capital because it hasn't embraced capitalism? Also Dengism is absolutely not an ML ideology, "socialism with Chinese characteristics" is fascism with state capitalist characteristics. If you have a "ML" society that has a massive government, enages in genocide, has powerful capitalists, private property, rampant corruption, and generally horrible for the workers (see working conditions and labor strikes in China)

THEN IT IS NOT EVEN A SOCIALIST SOCIETY

[–] finderscult@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Man you neolibs get worse every year.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

the most democratic nation currently on the planet

Sorry, but I didn't see anyone mention Denmark or Norway anywhere in this thread.

[–] finderscult@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why would anyone mention racist petrocountries that are essentially Saudi Arabia but white?

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 6 points 1 month ago

Sorry, I thought we were talking about democratic countries. Didn't realise it was "make up whatever shit makes you feel good" time.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mentioned the Nordic states, they're ok as far as neoliberal western states go (not very)

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone -1 points 1 month ago

Oh, so you did! I missed that.

I'll just say, having lived in Vietnam for quite some time, it certainly is a much better country than China, but describing it as "mixed" and "partially socialist" understates its issues. Corruption is rampant and open, and is the way of things in both the private and public sectors.

As just one example, the Saigon Metro project began construction not long before I stopped living there in 2012, and was scheduled to finish in 2018. Rampant corruption with that project has meant multiple times it's just stalled with seemingly no progress made for years, and the Japanese construction company hired to do some of the work threatened to pull out over cost overruns caused by the corruption. It's a lovely country in so many ways, and its government is so much better than those that tankies usually love to praise in terms of the degrees of gross authoritarian bs, but it's got a long it could improve in many regards.

Sure. Except if you allow those in power to define the meaning of demos, every single country that ever existed - including Nazi Germany - was democratic. As a result, the term democratic becomes tautological in that it is always true regardless of the system involved.

So yes, your statement that China is a nation is true.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Democratic countries don't silence people for outing criticism.

You must be sarcastic, otherwise your comment just doesn't make any sense.

[–] finderscult@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Good thing China doesn't either.

[–] spacedout@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How are you so sure? How do you see beyond western and Chinese propaganda and get to a semblance of truth? Genuine question.

[–] finderscult@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I've lived in China for work. It's genuinely no different than say, the Denmark in terms of "repression" except instead of arresting those that threaten capital, they arrest those that threaten the people (usually on behalf of capital). It's not an anarchist paradise, they haven't achieved communism, but they're likely the furthest thing from fascism that's still a nation. Anyone that claims to be on the left and dislikes their methods or compares them to fascists are genuinely either not on the left, or are baby lefties stuck in the 1800s in terms of reading and philosophy.

[–] spacedout@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thank you for the interesting answer. But seeing as you had to actually live there to get this impression, aren't you being a bit strict on who's (adult) left? Between western and Chinese propaganda, and a lack of [access to] Chinese critical sources, I think it's incredibly hard to know what's what without actually visiting. I mean, you can read a lot of Marx, Lenin and Mao, as well as contemporary critical theory, development studies, political economy and so on, without feeling like you're able to get a clear view. I know I don't.

[–] finderscult@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

I'm being purposefully hyperbolic to people that think investing in local communities is a genocide. Realistically yes, you can have leftist beliefs while believing anti left fascist propaganda. A whole lot of why the Weimar Republic fell was socialists believing fascists over their own comrades. But really if the only actual sources for a thing are people paid to explicitly be against communism, maybe don't believe it. Read some Chinese history, look into the myths like mao ordering sparrows to be killed and read why that's not a thing that happened and where those stories first started.

You will never have a clear view of anything regarding people, were too chaotic of a thing to objectively record, but you can get a much better idea if you understand the underlying motivations of those doing the recording. Chinese propaganda wants to entrench Chinese power for a China controlled by the people. American propaganda wants to entrench the ruling classes power for a China controlled by the American ruling class. Seems the biases are therefore a little uneven.

[–] kureta@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

Is it possible to find information on the actual day to day state of affairs in China?

[–] Euphoma@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The chinese web novel reverand insanity literally got banned for criticizing china. The guy who wrote it can't write it anymore and you can't even pirate the novel in china. cuz its been deleted off the chinese internet.

[–] finderscult@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That's nice and all, but there are literally millions of critics that aren't banned, whose work is publicly available, who criticize from a place of wanting to improve, not destroy.

China is ML, and if there's anything MLs live to do, it's criticize each other.

The vast majority of people that actually get banned from producing certain works either spread entirely false propaganda created by western intelligence agencies ( uighur "genocide" ) or want to remove the government entirely and replace it with a kleptocracy like the US has.

[–] spacedout@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Could you perhaps share any authors, works, blogs or whatever in English that critique Chinese politics in the manner you're describing?

Edit: Let me rephrase after having done some searching. If Marxists wanted non-Chinese government and non-CIA funded information about the conditions and struggles of Chinese workers, where would be a good place to find it?

[–] Euphoma@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

Fair. I don't follow chinese politics, I only read chinese webnovels translated into english so its the only thing I've heard of.