this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
226 points (100.0% liked)

196

16504 readers
3756 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm now starting to believe that images like these are the reason plant-based milk alternatives aren't allowed to be called milk in Germany

[–] tekila@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It clearly has nothing to do with the dairy lobby pushing hard everywhere to prevent people from switching to ecologically and humanely better alternative because they don't want to lose the fat subsidies they get from the government.

They try to push these legislations under the guise that it could induce the consumer in error, my ass.

Let's blame fun cartoons instead.

Let's not forget the cost with their lives the cows have to bear for us to get milk.

Forcefully impregnated, their babies taken away to be slaughtered as veal or to become milk cows. And all that for a fraction of their lifespan only to be slaughtered when their milk production starts to decline...

https://ourworldindata.org/environmental-impact-milks

https://insideclimatenews.org/news/02042021/meat-dairy-lobby-climate-action/

At least sometimes there is a bit of push back: https://www.just-food.com/news/eu-rejects-dairy-lobby-proposals-to-restrict-plant-based-alternatives/

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I appreciate the passion, my comment was still just a joke though.

That being said, I saw oat milk yesterday at the same price as cow milk. In other words, not even the financial incentive is left for me to buy cow milk.

[–] tekila@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey thanks for the precision. The frustration was not directed at you directly, moreso at the argument I thought you were making, I apologize for that. I have just heard this fallacious argument so many time in real life used seriously that I react strongly to it.

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh, I understand that. So many industries pull all kinds of bs to look better than they have any business to, it really is infuriating.

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

NGL spy milk is fire in coffee

I still (currently) prefer milk (lactose free (specifically dairy gold fit)) in my tea though

Spy milk just has the wrong texture for tea IMO

Edit: Meant soy but it got autocorrected to spy. I'm going to leave it as it's too funny to not.

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

Spy milk sounds like what Bond girls are left with at the hotel room

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Or maybe just because they aren't actually milk

[–] tekila@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I guess words can't be used in different context, especially when the plant-based alternatives are drop-in replacement for animal milks and the term has been used for hundreds of year to describe both plant-based milky substances and animal secretions.

Source: https://english.stackexchange.com/a/478323

[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago

Milk of the poppy, milk thistle, milk of magnesia...

it's almost like the word means a white liquid, of which mammalian breast milk is one type.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

hardly any calves become veal at all. it's a slim percentage.

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The dairy industry can have a little cruelty to calves, as a treat.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Jon_Servo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you buy the products, you're complicit. Sounds like people are pretty okay with it to me.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i buy petroleum products. i disagree with most of the aspects of their procurement, distribution, and use. if i stop buying them, none of that changes.

[–] Jon_Servo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Petroleum production decreases as we implement alternatives. Are you really going to tell me this isn't the case? 🤣

ETA: You know, for someone named commie, you're spouting a lot of neoliberal nonsense. "Ah, no sense trying to change anything even if we don't agree with it."

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“Ah, no sense trying to change anything even if we don’t agree with it.”

that's not what i'm saying. i'm saying being vegan isn't an effective way to change anything.

[–] ssfckdt@mastodon.cloud 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

journey of a thousand miles, etc.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

this platitude doesn't make buying beans an effective way to reduce the ecological burden of agriculture

[–] ssfckdt@mastodon.cloud 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

neither is fatalism an effective way to encourage change

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i'm not being fatalistic. i just don't believe buying beans is an effective way to fix the ecological problems of agriculture.

[–] ssfckdt@mastodon.cloud 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From what I've learned, this is called the "fuck it" principle. It doesn't make enough of a difference, so don't bother doing it.

It's a fallacy though.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not saying it doesn't make enough of a difference. I'm saying it doesn't make any difference. the fallacy you're referring to would be the Utopia fallacy and that's not what's going on here. fallacies trick people because they mirror good reasoning. I'm using good reasoning.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

i'm telling you there is no causal mechanism by which consumption dictates production.