this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
580 points (95.7% liked)

politics

18797 readers
2802 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 95 points 11 months ago (6 children)

What a pathetic creature. I hope he gets a jumpsuit as orange as his spray-on tan.

[–] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

Then he'll look naked. Ew.

[–] meldroc@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

If there's one thing I want above all else taken away from him assuming he's convicted, it's luxury. Trump should be forced to live like he's in an army barracks, or, well, a prison!

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

I hope he gets a jumpsuit for someone who is 6'3 and 215 lbs.

[–] fruitleatherpostcard@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Personally I wish he could be tortured to death and kept alive for as long as possible with various stimulants and machines to ensure a long, long, long process.

Others’ mileage may vary.

[–] JungleJim@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If I had meme skills I'd make a Simpsons "Don't make me tap the sign" macro, and the sign would have the cruel and unusual punishments clause on it.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Some people deserve it. Of course if it were legal, many who didn't would get it.

Though it being illegal doesn't stop the cops from doing it. Just look up all the news about people showing up at the ER instead of booking when arrested, the literal torture warehouse uncovered recently, and the general fascistic nature of US cops... Not even talking about Guantanamo or the military.

If you want the constitution to be adhered to, you already have work to do.

[–] JungleJim@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well yeah, duh. But that doesn't mean we stop trying to do better. People are saying "do the right thing", and you're saying "people already fucked up though" like it's some sort of, I don't know, excuse to not care about doing the right thing this time. Maybe, just maybe, if we can prove even the highest level crooks go to jail, we can shake the idea that "In America that there's no point in doing anything because it's already shit.".

I'm not saying let the fucker free. Lock him up til he dies. Prison rations. Solitary confinement. But if we torture, and excuse it because THIS TIME WE'RE SURE, and "it must be alright because the bad guys also tortured", then we've only made a more torturous union.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Nah, you were saying don't torture via tap the sign reference. I was simply saying that problem already exists, and it sure as hell isn't toward cops. It's from cops.

I was basically pointing out that if you're against torture, you should really hate these fuckers.

[–] JungleJim@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well okay, but nobody was saying cops should get a pass, or that we like cops. This thread isn't about cops.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, I'm speaking in the sub-context of explaining what kinds of cruelty already exists. This context stems from the "tap the sign" reference which was used to speak against cruelty towards horrible people who ostensibly actually deserve it.

If you're against cruelty to people who ostensibly deserve it, cruelty to those who don't should be a much higher priority. Yes, it is in effect a what-about-ism, but perspective is critical to having solid moral axioms.

[–] JungleJim@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There's a difference in having perspective and bringing up last week's book at book club.

I am against cruelty. Full stop. I am against torture. I don't have to list every type of torture to say I'm against this one. You're right, though, it's whataboutism. You're not adding perspective that cops are bastards on this tiny little federated open source website. Everyone here already knows that. We're all some sort of non-mainstream political identity. Look, that guy over there is a anarcho-syndaclyst furry. All you're doing is muddying the waters over a very simple statement that torture is bad.

Regarding anyone "deserving torture" Frodo: 'It's a pity Bilbo didn't kill Gollum when he had the chance.' Gandalf: 'Pity? It's a pity that stayed Bilbo's hand. Many that live deserve death. Some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them, Frodo? Do not be too eager to deal out death in judgment. Even the very wise cannot see all ends. My heart tells me that Gollum has some part to play in it, for good or evil, before this is over. The pity of Bilbo may rule the fate of many

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Wonderful words written not about the real world.

[–] JungleJim@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So you think torture is fun? Because it's not useful for gaining information. The only reason to do it is to make yourself feel better. Are you that sort of person? Gotta get your enemies into a position they can't defend themselves then you'll take your time causing pain? Your real world isn't worth preservation of you won't work towards a better one.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Nope. I just think some people deserve some of the pain they've inflicted on others. I believe some people are so evil they do not deserve sympathy.

I am both sorry and glad you have not seen enough of the real world to agree. Though you should probably open your eyes before it's too late.

The answer to the Paradox of Tolerance IS NOT absolute tolerance.

[–] JungleJim@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Saying "lock him away for ever, even kill him, but don't torture" isn't falling for the paradox of tolerance. It's saying that if we're willing to be just as evil then what's the point of fighting them? There has to be something that makes us different. And for me it's saying yes, stop crime, even kill if we have to. But torture doesn't reduce crime. Torture doesn't gain trustworthy intelligence information. There is no point in torture other than to take delight in pain. Anyone who thinks otherwise is wrong and anyone who agrees and desires to torture anyway is a monster.

I'm sorry that whatever you've seen of the world, you weren't strong enough to keep your humanity and kindness through it, and now would rather perpetuate pain than end it.

[–] fruitleatherpostcard@lemm.ee -2 points 11 months ago

Personally I wish he could be tortured to death and kept alive for as long as possible with various stimulants and machines to ensure a long, long, long process.

Others’ mileage may vary.