NaibofTabr

joined 1 year ago
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 9 points 17 hours ago

death by snoo snoo

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 28 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Rupert Murdoch is to blame for a lot of it.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 9 points 1 day ago

"Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is."

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I don't see the problem.

Don't be so negative.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Here's a useful comparison.

The biggest question is, do you think your tax percentage will be higher now, or higher in the future? If you think your income might increase later (placing you in a higher tax bracket), or that the government might increase your tax burden later, then it's better to pay taxes now.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 22 points 1 day ago

(D), in case anyone was in doubt. Also:

The Car Privacy Rights Act is cosponsored by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 59 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I mean... what is your threat profile? Are you a LastPass engineer with an unpatched Plex install and access to the company file server? (edit: LastPass not LinkedIn)

Are you going to do something that would attract the attention of law enforcement or nation-state threat actors?

Are you going to be using this mini PC to do your taxes?

Is it going to be in a DMZ with open access to the Internet?

Are you going to use it as an authentication server for other critical assets?

If you aren't assessing your risk level with some realistic idea of what threats actually apply to you and weighing that against the possible consequences of a breach, then you're pointlessly worrying about low-probability scenarios. Operational Risk Management right? Judge your risk by probability of occurrence and severity of impact and then make decisions based on that.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

As one of the Mastodon users pointed out, it's very likely that those cells are still producing some current when exposed to light. The electrical contacts would be a hazard.

I would also expect this thing to get pretty hot in sunlight - after all it's designed to absorb energy.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I agree that redundancy is a good way to mitigate risk, but there are so many problems between us and successfully colonizing another world that this is basically a pipe dream.

Astronauts experience a lot of health issues.

After less than a month in space, the tubules that fine-tune calcium and salt balance showed signs of shrinkage, which the researchers say was likely due to microgravity rather than GCR.

The study suggests that optic disc edema and choroidal folding contribute to spaceflight-associated neuro-ocular syndrome, whose symptoms include headaches and visual impairment such as far-sightedness (hyperopia), which causes near objects to appear blurred due to lower visual acuity at short range.

The scientists said the heart tissues "really don't fare well in space," and over time, the tissues aboard the space station beat about half as strong as tissues from the same source kept on Earth. [...] Previous studies showed that some astronauts return to Earth from outer space with age-related conditions, including reduced heart muscle function and arrhythmias (irregular heartbeats), and that some, but not all, effects dissipate over time after their return.

And of course there's all the problems caused by radiation exposure once you're outside the Earth's magnetic field (Mars doesn't have a global magnetic field). Basically, we can put ourselves in a tin can and venture into space, but the human body evolved in Earth's gravity and radiation profile and it doesn't do well outside of that. At the present you'd have to be suicidal to try to live long-term away from Earth, and I don't think these are problems that we can just engineer our way out of.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 7 points 2 days ago

This is a constraint designed into bitcoin to produce artificial scarcity so that the volume of tokens doesn't massively inflate and destroy their value. A blockchain doesn't have to operate this way if the goal is to produce unique tokens as identifiers rather than as currency.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 4 points 2 days ago

There probably is such a conspiracy theory, or many based on the same theme. Occam's razor applies though - it's far simpler to just assume that Putin is a self-aggrandizing dictator who dreams of conquest (what do you get for a girl who already has everything?). After all, if it looks like a selfish asshole, and it swims like a selfish asshole, and it quacks like a selfish asshole, then it probably is.

Of course, there are many groups within the military-industrial complex who are happy to take advantage of his behavior.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 1 points 3 days ago

Cool, cool cool cool... your pocket knife isn't spring-assisted is it? or a gravity knife?

 

cross-posted from: https://merv.news/post/130483

After the last post publicly by Naomi Wu being

“Ok for those of you that haven't figured it out I got my wings clipped and they weren't gentle about it- so there's not going to be much posting on social media anymore and only on very specific subjects. I can leave but Kaidi can't so we're just going to follow the new rules and that's that. Nothing personal if I don't like and reply like I used to. I'll be focusing on the store and the occasional video. Thanks for understanding, it was fun while it lasted”

Naomi Wu mentions briefly on her silencing and how she is not nearly as safe as she was before now that it’s obvious to the Chinese government her disappearance won’t cause an uproar of bad press making China look bad.

view more: next ›