- Every anti-feudalist is either envious of the lords or a spoiled noble child who's never worked a day in his life.
- "Democracy" is a naive idea, why should people who can't even read have a say in how the Kingdom is run? Should carpenters have a "vote" in how bakers bake their bread too?
- Egalité sounds good on paper but it can't exist, it's against Nature, some people are just more blessed by the Lord's grace, that's how it's always been.
- And how exactly would a "private business" build a bridge across this river? Where would the architect get a royal charter if there's no King?
- Your steam engine is only possible because of feudalism!
- Actually, if you consult the records you will find that the present time is actually the best time in history to be alive, ever
MalarchoBidenism
joined 4 years ago
You studied history and you're a Marxist? Sounds like you didn't study it very well. Type "communism 100 brazilian deaths" into Google Images and then come back to me 
I do agree with the liberals that it's bad when Hamas kills civilians in their fight against Israeli apartheid, which is why I believe Israel must be destroyed and replaced with a non-apartheid Palestinian state where Jews and Arabs can live together, so civilians stop dying. 
The hostage thing is a great example of how liberals start from a conclusion and then find evidence to fit that conclusion: Hamas is bad not only because they killed people but also because they took old women and children hostage, the monsters. Meaning that, even if Hamas had not killed anyone, only taken hostages, they would still side with Israel. I have zero doubts that if Hamas had only kidnapped IDF soldiers libs would still be demanding unequivocal condemnations and talking about Israel's right to defend itself.
but they fancy themselves a western country
They are. This is what the west is.
Ancaps when the
when the corporate conglomerate that owns their house demands they pay the property ~~tax~~ fee or else they go to private jail (it's not a state)
If 20% of people own 80% of the land or wealth or whatever in a capitalist country then all that shows is that capitalism produces Pareto distributions. That does not mean Pareto distributions are some universal law of nature nor does it mean that non-capitalist systems are impossible.
This talking point is so maddening. What do they even mean by "efficiency" in allocating resources? How do you measure that efficiency? What is the metric being optimized? Wasted resources? People unable to fulfill their needs? Do they think free market capitalism is good at minimizing these things? They do don't they? Oh my god 