LwL

joined 1 year ago
[–] LwL@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Afaik they all kill you by being introduced into your bloodstream, the difference is mainly how they're able to accomplish getting there. So any poison will kill you if you inject it, but venom will mostly be safe to eat barring any wounds.

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

K is just shifted °C though and just removes what's nice about it with freezing/boiling of watee while requiring 3 digit numbers for every temperature you'd encounter in daily life. I think I'd rather use Fahrenheit

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

"Slightly" different lmao

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Think of an alternative scenario, not transportation but rather duplication. The original stays where it was, but a copy gets created elsewhere. To the copy, it will seem as if it got transported there. To the original, nothing will have happened.

Now you kill the original.

The only difference is the timing of ending the original.

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I thought they did that at the start of the year

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

If you want to hate them more, there were cases of wikis moving off the site and fandom just deciding to restore the content after the maintainers deleted it, claiming everything written on the site is their property. Absolute shithole and I refuse to use it if there are alternatives.

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

From what I've seen you have crossdressers self identifying as trap (a subgroup of all crossdressers and I could see how the term would be offensive to the rest as well) on one side and people that are unaware that group exists and think trap is exclusively a derogatory term for trans ppl (or think enjoying crossdressing MUST mean you're trans) on the other.

It's a whole mess as any offensive language tends to be, because words rarely ever only have one meaning and there's also more than one language in the world but terms still cross from one language into others.

Honestly as long as you're trying to be considerate of others I don't think anyone can fault you, and that goes for everything. People will try to speak for everyone, but even when they do speak for the majority there are usually exceptions.

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's A/76/460, which the person you're replying to did not mention, and which had the abstains and votes against because of the political context, aka being proposed by russia while they were leading an offensive war under the pretense of denazification. You know that's public information too, right?

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This was my experience just setting it up as dualboot and not doing super much with it. Sure I failed installing it a few times but I came out with more understanding of file systems, and in the end the wiki told me everything I needed to know.

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Sure, but where's the upside? (ethically, not sure if consuming your own meat could have some sort of weird effect on you, even though afaik the usual cannibalism issues wouldn't apply). If anything it's more ethical to take it from yourself because you consent to it, the farm animal probably doesn't.

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Afaik GPL 2 would be stopping google from making android closed source anyway, unless I got something wrong about the license terms. But if anything that supports your argument. The main reason google is generally supportive of open source is that they recognize that they benefit from it. The moment that changes, google will try their best to close off anything it can (granted I don't think it's that likely to change, but they're already abusing their position plenty).

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I wish. The conclusions drawn from it are beyond questionable, but if you give people the opporturnity to do something that is convenient for them and fucks over others, far too many will do it. You need rules preventing that. The custom not allowing people to put more cows is that rule keeping things intact.

Tragedy of the commons being a real thing is the perfect illustration of why unrestrained capitalism is terrible. If hoarding wealth isn't considered acceptable, the social pressure will prevent it from occuring. Anyone breaking the rules will suffer actual consequences.

view more: next ›