Ginjutsu

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Ginjutsu@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Man that's fucking crazy. Somehow looks like the entire crew survived too.

[–] Ginjutsu@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago
[–] Ginjutsu@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I used trakt.tv, Jellyfin has a great plugin for it.

[–] Ginjutsu@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not watching any of it until Bob Iger takes a pay cut and pays his writers.

[–] Ginjutsu@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Me, every time I hear about a new Star Wars show

[–] Ginjutsu@lemmy.world 73 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's quite... shapely?

[–] Ginjutsu@lemmy.world 150 points 1 year ago (35 children)

ProTip: you can easily deflate a car's tires by placing a small pebble in the valve cap before screwing it back on

[–] Ginjutsu@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Prob just another exclusivity deal.

[–] Ginjutsu@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Maybe it's just me, but I don't see "following" as an endorsement at all. To me, it's an incredibly passive action which affects nothing but a near-meaningless internet number and the content which shows up in your feed. For example, I follow over 3000 accounts on one of my social media profiles. Do my views need to perfectly align with every single one of those? When does it become not okay to follow someone?

My point is, people can follow a page for a multitude of reasons. I follow several online accounts and politicians specifically because I disagree with the content they post. I personally think it's better to know what your enemy is up to rather than to stick your head in the sand and pretend they don't exist. I would hope that doesn't make me a bad person, but there are many people online who apparently think otherwise 🤷

[–] Ginjutsu@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Scumbaggery aside, I find it incredibly disheartening that just following an account these days is enough to warrant having a giant red target painted on you. I really despise what social media has done to us.

[–] Ginjutsu@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Warm water breeds stronger hurricanes quicker. This is pretty scary news for any Floridians who are already nervous about hurricane season.

100
rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Ginjutsu@lemmy.world to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

___

 

EDIT 2: Ruud has posted some guidelines for community moderation

EDIT: I want to clarify that the purpose of this post isn't to call anyone out in particular, and I think it's best to approach this issue with a gentle hand. Users who are doing this aren't necessarily ill intentioned, but may not realize the negative affect their actions may be having on the instance, hence why it's important to have this discussion. That being said, I removed the link to the user originally mentioned in this post to avoid any possible witchhunts.

Original Post:

I'm not sure what to call them, but I've noticed a few instances of users on this server creating dozens, and in some cases over a hundred different communities, and doing absolutely nothing with them. No sidebar description, no logo, banner, welcome post, or anything.

I understand that some people may be doing this in good faith in an effort to make sure that these spaces exist in the first place. That's fine and all - as long as you're allowing other community members to step in and help maintain and grow these spaces you've created, I don't really have a problem with it.

However, I think there are a good amount of people who are grabbing communities... just to squat on them? For some odd reason?

Take a look at this user's account [redacted]. Doing a little poking around, it seems they're an account that's owned by a [redacted] company based in [redacted]. They also don't have a single post or comment on record. So... Why do they own over 100 communities, many of which are simply duplicates of existing, popular Reddit subs?

I think the biggest problem here is that we may have users who want to create, cultivate, and grow communities that they feel strongly about, but when you go to set up a community only to find that it's owned by someone who isn't putting in any effort to make it a place for discussion, or outright doesn't care about it at all, it's going to discourage people from wanting to contribute in that way. First impressions are important, and these users might be turned off of Lemmy from an abundance of seemingly dead or spam communities.

What do you guys think? Is this an 'issue' worth thinking about, or will it sort itself out with time? I know it may not be super important in the grand scheme of things, but it's a question that's been on my mind for a few days now.

 

cross-posted from: https://kbin.social/m/news/t/68521

Attention Billionaries: The Snail has been Detected, its Time to Move

 

This latest update shows a couple of players running a mission in the Yantar region. Exciting stuff!

For those unaware: xrMPE is one of the longer-running, WIP co-op mods for Stalker. Updates can be pretty few and far in-between, so I was super excited to see this video drop this morning. I highly recommend checking out the rest of their YouTube channel!

9
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Ginjutsu@lemmy.world to c/stalker@lemmy.world
 

Welcome S.T.A.L.K.E.R.s - newbies, veterans, and loners alike. I created this community to serve as a hub of discussion for our beloved game series as well as its adjacent works. Community info, links, and rules may be found in the sidebar.

Good hunting.

view more: ‹ prev next ›