this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
195 points (95.8% liked)

News

22886 readers
4353 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A White mother who said she was questioned about human trafficking while traveling with her biracial daughter has filed a lawsuit against Southwest Airlines, accusing the company of "blatant racism."

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] itsnicodegallo@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago

To add insult to injury, the mom was flying to her brother's funeral when, upon deboarding the plane plane, they were stopped by cops and questioned under suspicion of human trafficking. Can't imagine how rough the whole trip was for her.

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Had the same when travelling with my ex-girlfriend who was small and East Asian. Yeah, kind of racist of them, but whatever.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If I'm honest, I'm kinda okay if that happened to me, because if their methods are helping to stop actual human trafficking, then it's worth it.

I remember me at the beach with my girlfriend once. She was 22 at the time, but looked younger than that - 16 or 17. I looked like, well, the 23 year old dude I was. She fell at some point and I crouched to assist her. A lifeguard walked up to us and the whole time he was addressing her: "are you okay? do you feel safe?" Etc. My girlfriend answered all his questions and then he went away. He probably thought I was some pervert trying to take advantage of the situation. And I was like "I get it." If she was an actual minor and I was some pervert stranger, I'm glad someone was paying attention to the situation.

[–] academician@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If stopping Arabic-looking people stopped actual terrorist attacks, would it be worth it?

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

I gave this question far more thought than it probably deserves and the answer is no.

The only world in which this is possible is one where you define terrorism by appearance (which already hits pretty damn close to home). So I'd want the same mechanism applied to all people to catch the violent extremists of all appearances.

Most terrorists in the states are usually white and Christian.

[–] SamboT@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How often would it stop terrorist attacks for each person stopped? We are talking about saving lives versus saving people from being offended correct?

[–] Unaware7013@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

The TSA can't even prevent weapons from going through security checkpoints, and they have real equipment and guidelines for their security checks and still fail to find contraband over 80-90% of the time when they do internal audits of TSA security checkpoints.

The TSA is a joke as is, and we don't need them to chase after a ghost problem when they can't even figure out the real problems they're supposed to be worrying about.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're talking about formalising the concept of treating an entire demographic of people as 2nd class citizens who experience additional social barriers that others do not have to.

"I racially profiled every Mohammed in the US and 128,000 improper searches and surveillances down the list I discovered a terrorist. Mission accomplished."

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How many times would it have to happen to you before it got old and you stopped being okay with it?

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I don't know. That was 20 years ago. We only lasted about a year, and that happened just once. I can see how it could be annoying, but again, it's not like they're pulling me over for "driving while brown." There's a genuine concern about human trafficking.

If my annoyance helps innocent people from being trafficked, I'm reluctantly okay with it.

[–] SamboT@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Let's cross that bride when we get there?

[–] Blamemeta@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] SamboT@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I stand by what I said

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You do not want to cross the bride. Don't do that. Though, seriously, that's no good for anyone who it has already gotten very old for and that people are explaining away the feelings of.

[–] Squirrel@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Honestly, good for them for doing what they can against human trafficking. It's worth offending a person here and there to save people from that terrible fate. Unfortunately, differing skin tones/ethnicities are probably the easiest indicator of human trafficking to watch for.

[–] academician@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

Yeah, and they should totally be stopping people in turbans to prevent terrorism! Who cares if a few people are offended if it means saving lives, right?

This is a bad take. There are so many mixed race families in the world. It is not okay to start harassing all of them just because they might be doing something wrong. It's literally just racism no matter how you try to dress it up.

[–] Eladarling@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

That's the basis of every argument against free speech, Save the Children is more and more a dogwhistle excuse to harass a group someone doesn't like. Drag queens, lgbtq folks, adults creating and consuming adult content.

It's a way to intrude on privacy and free speech in a way that is unconscionable.