this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
140 points (94.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43747 readers
2316 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] freamon@endlesstalk.org 88 points 1 year ago (1 children)

TempleOS. All other operating systems are sinful.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.de 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Do you pray before logging in?

[–] freamon@endlesstalk.org 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It wouldn't let you log in at all if you didn't. It's devine 2FA.

[–] rumbleran@suppo.fi 5 points 1 year ago

You don't need to log in with TempleOS because God said so.

[–] redballooon@lemm.ee 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mac OS. People say it costs more, but I am not paying for a hardware and then some software that tries to make use of it. Instead I’m paying for a well thought out product that just works.

[–] DJDarren@beehaw.org 21 points 1 year ago

that (mostly) just works.

FTFY

As a Mac user since 2007 it feels like that statement gets a little less true every couple of years. But for me it’s still light years ahead of Windows when it comes to my workflow.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 34 points 1 year ago

Linux of course. I don't invite Apple or Microsoft into my computer. Apple has good hardware though so I can understand using a mac.

[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I use EndeavourOS. I like pacman and AUR, as well as the fact that Arch-based distros are well-supported by most software. I'm too much of a noob/too lazy to setup an OS without a GUI installer though, which is why I prefer Endeavour over Arch.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bentropy@feddit.de 23 points 1 year ago

Windows because I know how to use it.

[–] Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Windows 7.

It was the peak of windows.

It was slick. It was fast. It was stable, and it was super easy to use. Never had a single problem with it, and unlike past windows OS's it didnt require regular reformats to clean house for stability.

Unfortunately its dead now, and Microsoft abandoned that approach and switched to a slow burn approach at walled gardening.

I use Linux now, have been for years, because I saw where microsoft was going when Win10 was in previews, and there was no way I was going to be part of it.. So I jumped ship as soon as EoL was announced for Win 7

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] darcy@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're refering to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX. Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called Linux, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project. There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine's resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called Linux distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux!

[–] OwenEverbinde@lemmy.myserv.one 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't stop there. I like to give the FULL name of my operating system when I use it. Example:

"What distro are you running?"

"Oh on this laptop here? This laptop is running Mint, daughter of Ubuntu, son of Debian, daughter of Linux, son of GNU! Her ancestors hail from the mountains of Copyleft, where the mighty Stallman wields his hammer Emacs to forge her people's legendary tools!"

Anything shorter is just disrespectful.

[–] u202307011927@feddit.de 16 points 1 year ago

This is so annoying

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago

My 2nd favorite pasta, only topped by

Own a musket for home defense, since that's what the founding fathers intended. Four ruffians break into my house. "What the devil?" As I grab my powdered wig and Kentucky rifle. Blow a golf ball sized hole through the first man, he's dead on the spot. Draw my pistol on the second man, miss him entirely because it's smoothbore and nails the neighbors dog. I have to resort to the cannon mounted at the top of the stairs loaded with grape shot, "Tally ho lads" the grape shot shreds two men in the blast, the sound and extra shrapnel set off car alarms. Fix bayonet and charge the last terrified rapscallion. He Bleeds out waiting on the police to arrive since triangular bayonet wounds are impossible to stitch up. Just as the founding fathers intended.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] scottmeme@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago

Linux because Linux

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

Mac OS

It’s pretty, functional, and has unix underneath so I can use it the way I really like to.

[–] kratoz29@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

macOS and I like that despite how closed it is you can find new features, commands, apps and cool facts any day, I am gonna start to log all the good shit it has because my brain can't keep up LMAO.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FishSoupy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

MacOS, so easy to use that even 5 year old me had no trouble using it. Also because of how reliable it is, my custom PC running Windows has crashed more times in the past year than all the Mac’s I’ve ever had combined (since 2007)

[–] ProtonBadger@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Windows is rock solid and doesn’t crash unless there are problems with a 3rd party driver or hardware like RAM. That’s why custom rigs can sometimes have problems because it’s not all controlled by one company.

I prefer Linux though. I find Windows annoying.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Debian 12 just overtook Fedora for me after the Red Hat debauchery. With podman/distrobox/qemu/flatpak installed I really don't need my base OS to constantly be the latest and greatest. And I sure love that debian is community run and has taken the step to include non free software.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 11 points 1 year ago

Debian Linux on the server: all the flexibility I need in a server OS.

macOS on the desktop: it just gets out of the way and lets me do my job

[–] sep@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Debian. Been running debian stable on 99% of my servers at work. And debian testing on the desktop, and daily driver. What orginally made me switch from redhat 7 was how frequent i ran into rpm hell, and how difficult it was to do an inplace upgrade. When i could just dist-upgrad to debian woody and everything worked, with a few well documented tweaks, I was sold. And have been running Debian on everything since 2002 ish.
It is stable, reliable, and dependable for the most critical applications. Truly the universal operating system for me.

Edit: forgot to mention that on the 3 desktop machines i prefer KDE. It looks and acts most similar to amiga os, that i grew up with.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fixbeat@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Amiga Forever…I always wanted an Amiga

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PlexSheep@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago

Debian 12 runs all my servers. It's like the pinnacle of stability.

[–] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 8 points 1 year ago

I used to use windows but recently I installed Linux Mint to see how Linux works and to get more performance for gaming from my thinkpad.

[–] Loki@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Whatever the fuck my brain runs. It's done a pretty okay job keeping me alive, and that's worth something, right?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] hondaguy97386@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Been daily driving Pop OS with the Xanmod kernel for a couple years. Love it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] emi@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My answer isn’t unique, but Arch linux is just my favorite to use. I just really love the ability to assemble things exactly the way I like them during the installation process.

I also really like the idea of a rolling release distro, meaning no major upgrades. I just run pacman -Syu once a day and things have been great.

Lastly, almost any piece of software I could want is available in the official repositories or the AUR, and it’s super convenient to be able to install things right away from the command line.

Editing to add: My work laptop is a MacBook Pro and I love it. macOS is really pleasant to use and anyone who says it’s not is a liar. Apple’s user experience game is on point

[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

Linux Mint. Just works. Zero hassle. Zero shitfuckery.

[–] malappapas@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

I use arch btw.

Gives me the flexibility to do what I want and contrary to the internet I haven't managed to break everything. I managed to break Ubuntu through

[–] WeAreAllOne@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Debian 11 for my personal server, openSUSE tumbleweed for my personal use. Debian for stability and openSUSE for the latest and greatest of KDE plasma desktop environment!

[–] monotrox@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Currently running fedora, because it is stable, easy to use and just works. Also, gnome is imo the best designed major, full-featured desktop environment that exists out there (even including windows or macos).

You might get a more tailored experience with window managers but im currently to lazy to set that up. I did use dwm for a time though, but it wasnt really flexible enough for me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] davefischer@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I've been using Unix in one form or another since the mid 80s, so that's pretty deeply ingrained by now.

I was strongly biased towards Solaris & OpenBSD for many years (Solaris on nice Sun hardware, OpenBSD on small machines) but both began to annoy me a little bit recently, so I switched to Void linux. (Also, there was ONE feature of Linux that I REALLY wanted - extended attributes (name=val) in the filesystem. Love those.)

I'm fascinated by Multics & Control Data's NOS (70s mainframe OS's), but that's for historic study, not actual use.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

plan 9

I don't actually have the patience to run it, mind you. But it's definitely my favorite in principle.

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Windows 95 and Debian were my “holy crap this is cool” operating systems as a kid.

Windows slowly went to hell over the years, and Debian didn't, so now I mostly use Debian.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Linux.

But of course I need a desktop UI too so that alone isn't enough. I don't have a favorite though.

Windows has a decent core and good core UI, but makes it awful with win11 UI and product pushing. I'm being pragmatic, not enthusiastic, using it.

Ubuntu has or had PPA for selective more direct and up to date software, but I guess with the newer package distribution formats (flatpak and the others) I guess that's not necessary or a comparative upside anymore.

The UIs I tried or used on Linux I never really liked. It was reasonable or acceptable at most. I wonder if there's one I'd like out there.

[–] viridian@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Will I get jumped if I say MacOS?

I'm just kidding, but I do like MacOS. I just find it more aesthetically pleasing than Windows and I find it easier to use and longer lasting than Windows. Like, I had to use my 2014 MacBook Air with 4GB of RAM for a week because I needed to repair my main Mac. Yes, it was slow, I couldn't have too many apps running at the same time, and I couldn't have my customary 20 tabs open, but it was certainly usable and not too frustrating.

[–] thantik@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

If it weren't for Solidworks and the inability to run it on many Linux installs, I'd be on Linux full time. I run a couple of lightweight linux servers (reverse proxy, load balancer, jellyfin, etc) on some jailbroken chromeboxes, and I use Raspberry Pi's for AI/voice assistant/HomeAssistant/Automation stuff. But I use Windows for Solidworks, Fusion360, VSCode (microcontroller programming), and other things.

I don't use MacOSX for anything, though I think if the world came around and migrated to it, we'd all be in a better spot due to it at least being POSIX compliant UNIX. I feel like it would be easier to develop compatibility layers and migrate the rest of the desktop world over to Linux from there if it ever happened.

If I needed to develop cross-platform applications, I'd essentially HAVE TO have a Mac, as it's the only one that can run all 3 OS's for testing purposes with the least amount of hassle. Though, that may have changed since the new ARM based macs.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

I'm glad you asked. How much time do you have?

[–] Boogeyman4325@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago

Qubes OS

The virtual machine workflow has made me completely rethink how I use computers, and there's huge security benefits of compartmentalizing your digital life through Qubes. Qubes OS successfully compartmentalizes your VMs and brings them together under one unified desktop, so even though you have several VMs running, you can see all of them at once because you see their windows as if it was a regular Linux desktop.

There are some issues with it though, such as lack of 3D acceleration for gaming, and its rather picky hardware support. Along with needing hardware that supports Linux drivers, you need a crap ton of RAM (I'm running 20 GBs on my Thinkpad T450s) for all of the VMs you run at one time. It doesn't take as much CPU power as you'd think, though, as it uses Xen's PVH emulation, instead of full-blown virtual machines like you'd see with VirtualBox.

However, if you have the right hardware for it, and you don't mind dual-booting or using another machine for gaming, I urge you to give it a whirl.

[–] Venomnik0@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Between Linux Mint for its reliability and ease of use and Gentoo for just being really nice to use overall with a ton of the control linux is well known for.

[–] SPP@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

My favorite OS is Gentoo Linux.

The main reason being that you have full control of the system, from the kernel, init (OpenRC or SystemD), to the different packages.

I've also found Gentoo to be very reliable. (I've had some bad experiences with distros like Void with KDE Plasma freezing/crashing).

It's a rolling release distro, but with more stable package versions, unlike ArchLinux. However it also gives you the option to use the lastest packages (By adding them to accept_keywords)

And if you want you can experiment with different setups, for example using musl instead of GNU's GLIBC, or using clang as the default compiler instead of GCC.

[–] jimrob4@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago

Debian Linux. Because it just works.

Runner-up: Mac OS. Same reason as above, but not free, so it’s #2.

Second-runner up: Free DOS because why not?

Distant last place: Windows, cause occasionally you need to call in your retarded cousin who is the only one that can do that one thing just right.

[–] wilberfan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I would miss Manjaro if it went away. I like how it (cliche alert) "just works".

[–] MrShelbs@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Arch Linux all the way. I love the AUR, the Arch wiki (though it applies to a lot of distros) and customizable it is.

I’ve had a Mac for a few years, but the Linux « itch » came back and I couldn’t scratch it with macOS.

Now I see just how snappier Linux is compared to Windows or macOS on the same hardware and I really don’t wanna go back.

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Arch, because the documentation and support is really good. And it 'just works.'

When it comes down to it, the only difference between distros is basically just the package manager right?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›