this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
355 points (99.4% liked)

News

27260 readers
5247 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 48 minutes ago)

american aggression needs to not be tolerated. Not anywhere.

If you care about american lives, remember what happened to three generations of german men the last time anyone tolerated this behavior. The absolute undisputed slaughter of american military personnel the first time they try this shit will save so many in the long term.

make it short, make it bloody, and do not take prisoners if they make you fire a shot.

if you can't take the american military, hit american shipping. all of it. the american navy is huge, but it can't protect everything at once. two or three container ships taken out by torpedos should be enough to get people paying attention, especially if someone takes responsibility.

if america abuses the ocean for war, it should not get to use it for commerce.

[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 6 points 2 hours ago

"Police may have to be involved in my invasion of my victim's home" says criminal

[–] lennee@lemm.ee 9 points 6 hours ago

Oh yes it will get involved, the US will be kicked out but yes, NATO will be involved

[–] Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Just fucking try it you orange twat!

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 3 points 5 hours ago

He just had Rutte visit and thinks he could arrange that for him. Rutte skirted the question by affirming that the defense of the polar region was important.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 36 points 1 day ago

Which side does he think NATO would support?

[–] Ferroto@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

An attack on one is an attack on all. I always wondered what would happen if one NATO country attacked another.

it's also an attack on america. jesus fuck do we not remember how this ends?

kill the fucking americans if they pull this shit. make sure they see that open aggression only gets them coffin stuffing, and that only if they're willing to pay shipping.

[–] lennee@lemm.ee 11 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Aggressor gets kicked out and NATO has to defend the attacked

[–] nilo@lemm.ee 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yep. Because that’s exactly what happened with Greece and Turkey…

[–] lennee@lemm.ee 9 points 5 hours ago

Well, it was close to happening with greece and turkey. And I dont think cyprus is quite the same thing as the US trying to take over greenland, is it?

[–] picnic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Literally what's wrong with you? How dense can one carrot be?

[–] Canadian_anarchist@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 day ago

A literal carrot would be an improvement over the current orange tyrant.

[–] person1@lemm.ee 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Amazing. It is like they want people to hate America as much as possible before America starts confronting China.

[–] Devanismyname@lemmy.ca 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

As a Canadian, I don't know which country i hate more at this point.

[–] person1@lemm.ee 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I know I'm supposed to understand that China is horrible, and the young US dick-tatorship is still nothing compared to Chinese high-tech totalitarian dystopia... but somehow, seeing USA, a supposed former friend and ally, turn into a ruthless, unprincipled traitor, aligning itself with Russia... With Russia, of all states! And spitting in the face of the hero of our times...

We know Russians here in Poland. We know how their army works, we know their mentality. When Ukraine reported war crimes, we believed them. Seeing US backstab Ukraine like that... It's just too much. I think the American brand is dead for us.

[–] Devanismyname@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

China has done about 1/100th the crap the us has. Even at its best, the us was overthrowing legitimate governments and destroying entire nations. China may not be perfect, but they are a whole hell of a lot better than the us.

[–] lennee@lemm.ee 3 points 5 hours ago

China is a shit country. But like if you look at where they are coming from historically I think they are moving forwards. America is moving backwards. China has a ton of potential and I hope the chinese use it well. I am less hopeful for americans at this point.

No matter how dumb you think he is I'm sure his cult is lapping it up.

"We want you to violate the sovereignty of a fellow NATO country. Are you in?"

[–] BlackRing@midwest.social 202 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I hope NATO does get involved. Not the same way Trump hopes though...

[–] happydoors@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, what’s he smoking thinking that they would help invade a sovereign nation?!

[–] Nemean_lion@lemmy.ca 90 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Canada has three of top 5 longest sniper kills. Ukraine has the top spot. We just need to export a small chunk of metal at high velocity into a golf course.

[–] Embargo@lemm.ee 51 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I hope you're prepared to pay an extra 25% on that export.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KulunkelBoom@lemm.ee 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Putin stooge wants an easy war somewhere.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 112 points 2 days ago (19 children)

This is wholly out of control.

Fix your country, you absolute selfish idiots.

[–] dephyre@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago (24 children)

I don't disagree, but... how?

load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 93 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Dumbass doesn't even understand that NATO is a DEFENSIVE pact and that Denmark is a member. Not wanting to give you their territory doesn't count as an attack.

Also if he really cared about security he would have strengthened his ties with his allies instead of pushing them away. The US is far less secure now that it was 3 months ago.

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Not wanting to give you their territory doesn't count as an attack.

Having been married to a narcissist for 11 years, yes, that's literally how they think. My ex would fly off the handle if I told her "no" to sex or whatever it was that she wanted. She'd throw out all kinds of excuses about how it was my fault somehow, and even during our divorce, when we were literally separated, she forced her way into my room (we still lived in the same house for a few weeks) just to "cuddle" and would throw a fit if I didn't give in. Remember, we were getting divorced. I had to put my foot down hard on that line. And yes, she would get violent.

Orange presidents with tiny dick syndrome calling a country's refusal to give up territory an "attack" is not much different, fundamentally.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Trump added that the result was very good for the US and 'the person who did the best is a very good person as far as we’re concerned'

Me too form together words too

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The more I look into Greenland situation the more I am thinking there's already a psychological campaign in play to get them to be part of the US. They're legitimately trying to get away for the Danish government and there's a strong US presence there already with military bases. I suspect the target is to get them to hand over the keys not only willingly but ask for it.

Then we drill drill drill dig dig dig

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Trumps fundamental and broad stupidity amazes every day.

[–] Krik@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The mighty US of A needs NATO to invade an island with 56,000 inhabitants?

Is Wakanda located on that island or what?

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Maybe he meant against us not supporting us?

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 27 points 1 day ago

Given that he regards the Department of Justice as his personal litigators, it makes sense that he’d regard NATO as his enforcers.

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 55 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Kill him. I'm Canadian. Come at me.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He wants Greenland the same way as Putin wanted extra countries. How many countries did Russia invade between 2000 and 2020?

National security is just a pretext. Greenland already contributes to your national security you king. They’re a part of NATO. You already have force projection up there if required.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Trump thinks that NATO is his personal army now?

Eh, must be Tuesday

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›