this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
4 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

29684 readers
3380 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Why does it feel that the evil sides globally are winning. Even evil people are winning. Why?

(page 2) 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We need more violent good guys

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Because good times create weak people. Weak people create difficult times. Difficult times create good people. Good people create good times.

I think we're ushering into the era of weak people creating difficult times, after having good times for a while.

Edit/extra commentary: What I mean to say is, in America at least, we've elected people who are weak in character, to represent us. Money seems to matter to the people making decisions more than anything else. That in turn creates a difficult time for the people of the society that elected them. I think in a world consumed with money, fame and superficial things like that, people of good character stand out.

[–] EndofLife@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago

But what made me gay?

[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's a global far right power grab fueled by money from Russia using weaponized disinformation. It's been going on for decades at a smaller scale before Facebook, etc, even existed. It's also fueled by conservative dark money groups funded by conservative billionaires. You should read the book Dark Money, I highly recommend it.

Even the antivax stuff is from Russia and it way predates the big platforms. It was started in the crunchy mom communities on Livejournal, where they first experimented with seeing if westerners would glom on to weird mommy trends like not using shampoo, nursing your kids to ridiculous ages, "unassisted birth", which is where people deliver babies without any medical care at all, "unschooling", etc. That took off in a big way and then they began with the antivax stuff, and used Livejournal as a tool of Russian government propaganda.

Then they started funding white supremacist groups, and the groups like the yellow vests, Moms for Liberty, etc. Really recommend learning about dark money and Russian weaponized disinformation.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's pretty convienient how all bad things stem from a single, external source, preventing the need for any sort of internal societal reckoning. How fortunate that we were born on the good guys' side and all we need to do is focus on our states' geopolitical enemies, and if they can be kept in check, it'll solve every one of our domestic issues, upto and including old wives tales.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think I'm saying that at all, just that this is where it stems from and that Republicans and their supporters have glommed onto it. Obviously I'm saying it's multifaceted.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Do you have any sort of evidence that connects the Russian government to things like not using shampoo?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

False equivalence is part of the disinformation. The enemy of the perfect should not be the simply good

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Because the return of massive wealth disparity - similar to having kings again - has allowed those with money and power to bend the world in the direction of some form of dictatorship, whether it be fascism, oligarchy, whatever…. The New Kings are carving up society and want to increase control and profit, and an authoritarian governance is the way to do it. Just like how they treat their corporations. They are dictators, the little people are disposable production units to feed their machine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Because sensationalism creates ad revenue. So the news you receive from any side of any story is going to try and make you as angry/scared as possible so you’re more apt to share it and spread the word- they then use the page bits and time spent on their sites to generate more ad revenue.

Stay away from tankie, far-left, liberal, democratic, conservative, republican, and MAGA-affiliated sites. They’re guaranteed to not be honest with you. Instead, stick with independent and unbiased sources like Reuters and Associated Press.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

stick with independent and unbiased sources like Reuters and Associated Press.

Lol

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Considering how freely and often you use terms like “shitlibs,” I can see how something like this might make you laugh.

Is it the over seventy prestige in journalism awards between them that you find funny?

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Anyone still trying to say AP and Reuters are independent and unbiased after the way they've covered Israel's genocide is just revealing their own extreme ideological bias.

Also, the whole concept of saying to avoid liberal sources and then pointing to liberal sources while saying that they're "unbiased" (as if bias free sources are even possible) is a peak example of fish not knowing what water is.

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah… there no point it discussing this with you.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Average liberal when presented with facts.

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Okay… let’s play this game. I want you to go ahead and prove these “facts” of yours for me. Give me unbiased sources that provide empirical evidence to support your claim.

EDIT: Note how throughout the rest of this conversion, this person failed to answer the question, and tried several times to distract by trying to make be defend a point that wasn’t necessary to defend. This is what they do.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 week ago

there is no such thing as an unbiased source

[–] the_three_tomatoes@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

That's, ironically, how the white supremacists felt all these years lol

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BaldManGoomba@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because they have always been win. Evil never sleeps and it will always exist. Good people have to fight every day to make progress. Perfect example is Bernie sanders and democrats. Bernie has been fighting since the 70s. Democrats have been it is good enough things are fine just defend the status quo. Meanwhile people are working everyday to setup bad things with currently things reaching back as far as Clinton and people can argue Reagan.

Evil never sleeps and is constantly working to undermine peace. Lots of people are honestly mediocre or middle of the road once things are good enough they stop fighting. There has only ever been a few good people fighting. People deep in community actively doing good things.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Bernie had a shot at winning but instead gave it to Hillary.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

the hard answer: the voting populace is the single stupidest form of combined intelligence to ever exist, im pretty sure 3 children under the age of 7 in a room would have a higher average IQ than any state in america when measuring the voting populace.

Voting is a joke. People don't take it seriously, it's all vibes based, and those vibes are horrendously unreliable and meaningless.

the soft answer: it is, for now. It will change, just give it time. It's inevitable.

[–] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The perspective I subscribe to is that access and abundance has outpaced the average persons ability to choose. By which I mean, their talent at choosing. An overall inability to make quality decisions. I would say the issue really grew some teeth in maybe the 50's and has been accelerating more or less exponentially. The art of exploiting this inability to choose first starts getting real traction in the evolution advertising. Getting people to buy cans of beans and cigarettes was the larval form of a much more sinister science of mass manipulation. The internet definitely threw gasoline on the fire. And now no one knows what is quality, or true, or nutritious, or sustainable, or important. The average person is completely overwhelmed and operating on a low-level fight-or-flight type reasoning. Unfortunately I don't think there is a short term solution. People need to start learning at a very young age explicitly how to not be a mark. Which is antithetical to the wealthy and politically connected people whose bread and butter is hoards of unscrupulous consumers of products and rhetoric.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 week ago

Evil was winning, we're watching the collapse of the evil empire from within.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›