this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2025
119 points (96.9% liked)

politics

19294 readers
1681 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Mark Zuckerberg ended Meta's factchecking program on Facebook and Instagram, replacing it with user-submitted "Community Notes," similar to Twitter.

The move is part of a broader shift to the political right, aligning with Donald Trump's incoming administration.

Zuckerberg criticized factcheckers as “politically biased” and promised fewer “censorship mistakes.”

Meta has also elevated conservatives to key roles and moved content moderation operations from California to Texas, mirroring Elon Musk’s strategies.

While the changes may alienate liberals and some advertisers, analysts expect minimal financial impact on Meta.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 hours ago

My theory: since all the big tech companies seem to be making "donations" and bending over backwards to do favours for Trump before he's even in power, I suspect it's going to eventually come out that he's been selling exemptions to tariffs for companies who bend the knee.

Those companies will then only raise their prices by 50% instead of the 65% their competitors will have to do, and they'll try to play it off as altruism.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Cowardice and boredom.

He's likely completed his Hawaiian bunker fortress and, like a cop with a cold gun on his hip, reminding him everyday that he isn't using it, he wants to start some shit so he can (he hopes) feel something. Similar to how the Christians want the end of the world, because their lives are empty and they want to see if they were right about the existence of a god. They'd end us all in a moment to satisfy their own selfish impulses

[–] DerArzt@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

A lot of words to say: Money

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago

Between this and the AI accounts, they're being real explicit about manufacturing public opinions.

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why?

You're actually asking why?

Because Mark Zuckerberg is a fucking Nazi, just like Trump and Musk.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

WOW. He just wears the uniform and marches to the beat because he might be persecuted otherwise. It’s totally different, even though it’s only noticeable if you can literally read his mind. Next you’ll say those nine people sitting at a table with a nazi are nazis.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

Trump is about to finish what Reagan started. All these.policy shifts prove it.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Wealthy, insulated fashys think they have no use for the truth. That it's just an expense. And the people at large have not stepped up to correct them.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's so wild to me that all of these gun nuts cannot help but throwing out the point that it's to combat tyranny for any argument ever, and then when they finally see tyranny, they're literally buying fucking merch to further propagate it.

You could write this into a movie or TV show, and it would be poorly reviewed for not being realistic.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think most of us could have predicted this decades and decades ago, though. Many are some of the same dinguses that fly the loser flag of traitors, after all.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We talking about that actual dish rag or the other dish rag with an X on it?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Well, the flag they should really fly if they want to celebrate "their heritage" is a white flag of surrender, since they lost.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Look around. No one is correcting them because they aren't wrong. No one cares about truth. Lies make everyone so much happier.

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Disagree. Lies make everyone angrier. That's what the lies are designed to do.

[–] BeN9o@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I don't think they're designed either way, you can lie to a kid about how long a journey is as they have no real concept of time, this is a white lie, to stop them moaning about being stuck in the car. Lots of people (sheep) just want to be told the grass is greenest right where they are and there's no need to look any deeper, ignorance is bliss. Lies should make people angry, but for some reason they don't. It's almost expected from certain people, like anyone in power will probably lie.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It only works for a short time. It will break. And break more violently the longer it drags on.

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 1 points 1 day ago

They have a use for truth, but only when it suits them, otherwise it's just an opinion like any other.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Let's be honest. It's not that Mark is a facist or whatever. It's because the change is good for him personally, and he just doesn't care about others. As for why it is good for him... workers in texas are cheaper, and most of the people currently on the team in Cali will quit rather than move.

[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

For real. Dude gave that presser with the outline of sun glasses tanned onto his face I assume from spending his riches in a summer house with a lot of sun.

They're so fucking shit lol.

[–] WeUnite@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

analysts expect minimal financial impact on Meta

Let's make the analysts wrong and boycott Meta products. Quit Facebook, Instagram and Threads.

There's a common saying; If 9 people sit down at a table with 1 Nazi without protest, there are 10 Nazis at the table. The people at Meta are like the 9 people, they pretend to act ignorant but they know exactly what they are doing. They care more about profits than they care about the country so we must make it so they loose big from this decision.

[–] takeda@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Hmmm, is there a way to just quit and leave an access to messenger (preferably by non Facebook app?) I have account since 2006 and want to kill it, the only thing that keeps me is still a few of people that I don't have other ways to contact.

Edit: not sure if Facebook got confused (due to visiting Europe), but on my family member messenger it showed option to separate Facebook account with messenger due to European regulations. I wish it have me that option.

[–] WeUnite@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm very surprised but this does seem possible: https://www.facebook.com/help/messenger-app/1526848634305688/

However if possible I think it would be good to try convincing your friends to switch to a more secure chat app such as Signal.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Fascism is on the match. The problem is not that they are on the move. The problem is that many of us just join the march but caring about what we are doing ... or not doing.

And no I'm not calling for revolution.... I'm just calling out everyone that participates in corporate social media and wonder why they are encouraging the spreading of lies and propaganda

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

~~He and other "tech leaders" wanted to be sure they are seen servicing donvict.~~

Oops, I mean, he wanted to facilitate better relations with the incoming admin.

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Probably because fact checkers cost money and not fact checking is free.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Because they were always intended as a propaganda and surveillance network. That's what targeted advertising and marketing analytics are.