this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
396 points (93.0% liked)

196

16743 readers
2302 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

gurl up top looks SO comfy cozy in her gymnastics suit <3

[–] Dupree878@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Avoid the nervous system, internal organs that aren’t heart, lungs or liver, lymphatic and glandular systems and you eliminate prion disease worries

[–] MantisTobogganMD@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

the higher the net worth the richer the backstrap

[–] starbrite@lemmy.zip 6 points 15 hours ago

The fact that they used ashley graves for this meme is killing me

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

When the German cannibal Armin Meiwes was on trail, it was actually a legal conundrum. Meiwes' victim had explicitly consented to being killed and eaten, even dictating how he wanted to have it done to himself. So was it murder or more of a convoluted version of assisted suicide ("killing on demand" is the legal term in Germany)? He was eventually convicted of manslaughter and got a prison sentence of eight and a half years, a few years later changed to a sentence for life.

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 81 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago

nomnom mlem :3 <3

[–] MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world 16 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Dupree878@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

Which is different from Kuru but the effect is the same

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 25 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

If I'm dead, I absolutely would have no quarrels with people eating my body. Nothing to complain about since I hold no beliefs that when I die, my body needs to be intact for me to go to a heaven like place.

Also, who cares what any family members would think. It's my body, not theirs. If I don't mind people nibbling on my corpse, then I'd hope any family that cares about me is able to respect that wish.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 7 points 22 hours ago

To be fair, if you're dead you'll have no quarrels with anything. I understand what you mean though. You have no quarrels now if someone eats you when you die.

[–] Alice@beehaw.org 19 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I remember seeing someone get a callout post on Twitter for saying they don't see an ethical problem with cannibalism if it's consensual. That's all they said, and they got dogpiled so hard that they apologized and went to therapy for their "unnatural thoughts", and the callouts continued.

Unless several Twitter users plan to give them unrestricted access to their corpse soon, I don't see why that's callout-worthy.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 25 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

I don't just not see an ethical problem with it if it's consensual. I'd argue it's the most ethical way to eat meat in that case. We do horrible things to animals without their consent. If someone consents to being eaten, that must be more ethical.

You can argue it's disgusting or something, but if you're arguing with ethics as the basis, consensual cannibalism has to be better than eating other animal meat.

[–] domdanial@reddthat.com 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

My biggest argument for ethics is that if it is legal to do, it will be easier to provide incentives for it. Already a problem with illegal substances and such I guess.

The rich and powerful have a problem where the normally unattainable luxuries/curiosities in life are freely available and boring. It's why you see millionaires doing crazy stunts, and so many get into illegal drugs or trafficking, like with Epstein and his ilk.

They can offer money, power, or other benefits to those who don't have it, and also manipulate the circumstances in their favor, and create a market for human meat. One where the poorest of people could sell their own parts/body, or create parts for consumption if supply drops. Our current system does the same with labor, but that seems significantly less damaging.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 11 hours ago

Your argument is valid, but by the same logic selling yourself for work is unethical, yet we all do it. I agree there is logic to it and the system of incentives is messed up, but I don't necessarily agree selling yourself for cannibalism is any worse than selling yourself for labor.

[–] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 21 hours ago

People just like to rationalize their disgust. It's probably also why homosexuality is supposedly immoral.

[–] Bonsoir@lemmy.ca 6 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

All we need is to engineer animals to consent being eaten.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Did they actually go to therapy or did they just say that to try and save face? (Not that I believe they deserved that level of push back necessarily.)

[–] Alice@beehaw.org 5 points 14 hours ago

That's a good question. I kinda hope they didn't, because that's a stupid amount of money to spend to punish yourself for an unorthodox opinion.

[–] LiamMayfair@lemmy.sdf.org 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

idk man I think the mental gymnastics go the other way around here. You have to make a shit load of assumptions to consume human flesh safely and ethically:

  • the person being eaten consents to their body being eaten
  • the person has no family or each and every one of their relatives consents and is totally ok with their loved one's body ending up in a casserole
  • the person has no diseases that can be transmitted by consuming some or all parts of their body: prion disease (brain), AIDS, hepatitis and loads other blood-transmitted illnesses, to name a few obvious ones
  • there are no drugs or medications in the person's body that could be absorbed into your system (regurgitated meth, yummy!)
  • you have the means to effectively and safely process or cook the body yourself or we set up an entire new industry around mass human body consumption which sounds like the plot of a Stephen King novel tbh

As some have pointed out here, if eating human meat is your only available choice in an extreme life-or-death survival situation, it would have to do, but unless you also have the means to carve up and cook the body, you're actually going to consume more energy digesting the raw flesh than what you're getting in return. Humans make for rather poor food overall, that's a fact. I would back this up with some evidence but I don't feel like being put on a list for looking up the nutritional contents of human bodies lol

[–] iamtrashman1312@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

It already is the plot of a novel, and it's by Augustina Bazterrica, not that hack Steve

[–] Alice@beehaw.org 13 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I don't care for cannibalism but the second bullet doesn't sit right with me. I always wanted to be composted. My family will hate that, but I don't think it's their choice.

[–] LiamMayfair@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 45 minutes ago

Sure, that makes sense, but not everybody leaves a will behind or lets anybody know about their wishes when they die, out of ignorance, sudden death, there are a lot of reasons why you may die and haven't told anyone what to do. Happens a lot with organ donors, for example.

In lieu of the deceased's will, the relatives need to make a decision. And, IMHO, this whole cannibalism thing is a lot harder to wrap your head around than having your loved one's organs harvested to save somebody else's life, for example.

[–] NaevaTheRat@vegantheoryclub.org 3 points 15 hours ago

Funerals are for the living, not the dead. I struggle to think of a good reason not to acquiesce to their wishes prior to dying, so as to make their grieving easier, given that yours will not matter at all then.

[–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 23 hours ago

the person has no family or each and every one of their relatives consents and is totally ok with their loved one's body ending up in a casserole

Assuming your first condition is already met then nah, a person's own wishes as regards their own body ought to supersede those of anyone else

[–] SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 day ago

ey gonna be honest, i wouldn't want to eat human flesh, even when im starving.

however if my dead body can save someone's live then they gotta do what they gotta do. it's not like i need it anymore

[–] _cnt0@sh.itjust.works 120 points 1 day ago (25 children)

Prion diseases. Accumulation of different substances, like mercury, lead, strontium-90, and, a new contender to the list: micro plastics. And you'll want to have a look at a person's medication and likely want to make sure they've been off of it for a few days before consuming their flesh.

[–] amzd@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Farm animals are legally allowed to eat actual plastic, not only microplastics. If you’re afraid of microplastics or accumulation of substances maybe don’t eat meat.

Legal limit of plastic in animal feed is 0.15% in the EU

A cow eats 25kg of dry food a day

25/100*0.15 = 0.0375kg = 37.5grams

A plastic bag weighs 6-8grams.

You are legally allowed to feed your cow 5 plastic bags a day (as a snack)

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Bioaccumulation concentrates more pollutants the higher up the food chain you go. It is part of why most meat we eat comes from vegetarian animals. The fish we eat are often predatory so common advice is the keep the smaller and younger ones that are still big enough to be worth filleting. You don't actually want to eat a trophy sized fish because they've accumulated more pollutants. Trophy sized fish are better off being realsed, they are often good breeders and help keep healthy population numbers.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TragicNotCute@lemmy.world 63 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Prion diseases are scary shit and not to be fucked with.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 day ago

Yeah. Terrifying. Prion diseases are one of those things that I wish I had never learned about.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

OK, mate, I have good news and bad news. The good news: we're having a feast and you're the guest of honour. The bad news: you need to stop taking your meds for a few days.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 35 points 1 day ago (3 children)

"How would you feel if someone ate your body?"

Would I be dead? I wouldn't care then, how could I? Go ahead, make more use of the body.

[–] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In survival situations I don't see it as that much different than organ donation.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As long as I was already dead when someone decides they want to eat it, I'm fine with that.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] socsa@piefed.social 8 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

You haven't eaten ass until you've eaten corpse ass

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If anyone wants to kill and eat me, go right ahead

It'll be nicer than dying alone and having my body rot in my apartment till someone eventually checks on me

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MrMobius@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Prions are a big problem for cannibalism since they resist high temperature. So they're still deadly even if the "meat" is well cooked. That said, Bones And All was a great film about cannibalism. And it was romantic, in a fucked-up way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thurstylark@lemm.ee 14 points 1 day ago

Heh, my partner and I have already had the, "I don't seek it out, but if we're life-and-death stranded and you go first, sorry, you're provisions now" conversation.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Endocannibalism - eating people from your own group -has been practised as a respectful part of funerial traditions by a handful of cultures across the world and may have been more widespread in prehistory.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah so has ritualistic rape of boys to instill them with manhood. Historical precedent does not infer a normative ethical framework in any direction.

[–] HollowNaught@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Once had an actual paedophile use that example as a reason it's okay. Completely fucked up

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

My main gripe is that humans don't have much meat on them. It works in a pinch, but the effort needed to eat so far outside of our normal pallette isn't worth it.

That said, I would be in favor of letting nature decompose our bodies more. I hate having to waste so much effort on disposing of bodies, especially once I die. I want my body to get torn apart by animals, not buried with holy rites. Mummification is the only burial practice that seems kinda cool. Cremation seems unnecessary, especially if I can get eaten by something instead. Just take what's useful, chop me up a bit, and throw me in the compost!

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just dump me in a forest somewhere

That can kinda be arranged, actually. Something that came up during one of Caitlin Doughty's videos is a nature preserve type place in Florida that they protect by burying people there to decompose naturally. I'm not going to look for more info about this on Christmas though, lol.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›