this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
411 points (99.3% liked)

World News

39390 readers
2256 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A French court sentenced Dominique Pelicot, 72, to 20 years in prison for drugging and raping his ex-wife, Gisele Pelicot, and arranging for other men to rape her while unconscious over nearly a decade.

Of the 51 co-defendants, all were found guilty, with sentences ranging from less than 10 years to 20.

The trial, marked by shocking evidence, spurred national debate on rape culture and consent laws.

Gisèle's courage in waiving anonymity has galvanized feminist movements, with campaigners calling her a national hero for sparking societal and legal reflection on sexual violence.

all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 62 points 1 week ago (2 children)

20 years seems like a wrist-slap, but given that the main perp is likely in his 70s, this is a death sentence. I think the younger rapists should get life in prison, what the fuck is this 10 years sentencing bull shit.

[–] Phineaz@feddit.org 54 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This would be close to the maximum possible sentence in Germany, I assume France has similar rules.

[–] Tyfud@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Interesting that there weren't multiple charges of rape he was found guilty for, like would happen in the states. Each rape occurrence would have been a separate charge, and each one would have carried a 20 year maximum, so he'd be serving hundreds of years easy.

This is generally to ensure that even if he gets some of his years commuted for good behavior while inside prison, he's still got hundreds of years left to go. Making it a death sentence.

With that said, the US prison system is archaic and punitive, so I might need to re-evaluate my views.

[–] rbn@sopuli.xyz 50 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

In Germany at least, jail time doesn't scale linearly with the count of crimes or victims. Jail time isn't primarily meant as revenge or punishment, but more as the time required to revisit the mistakes you did and to make you again a functional member of society.

It won't necessarily make a difference if you murder one person or 10 or 100. Typically, the sentence will be 15 years. If the judge thinks you're too dangerous to ever be released again they can order you to stay in prison after the 15 years end ("Sicherheitsverwahrung") but also this decision will be revisited at some point.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Jail time isn’t primarily meant as revenge or punishment, but more as the time required to revisit the mistakes you did and to make you again a functional member of society.

Dear Americans;

This is what happens when your prisons don't rely on private profit motives to operate.

Signed: The civilised world.

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I always enjoy the Americans having their minds blown when they find out how a rehabilitative justice system works.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's crazy to me that they've set up a system that essentially requires recidivism in order to keep meat coming through the doors to function, and yet somehow think that that's normal.

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's this common myth that some people are 'just born bad'. I think that might be true for some, but the majority of crime is due to circumstances. Americans as a whole just cannot seem to accept that, plus the lot of them seem to have massive schadenfreude boners over "law and order".

[–] dalekcaan@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

But if they weren't born bad, I'd have to contend with the fact that I'm not naturally morally superior to them!

[–] flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Normally I'm 100% for this, it's just that this particular case seems so evil and egregious...

[–] rbn@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, I guess it depends on what you want to achieve.

If just you let a criminal rot in jail forever without any perspective, that's just an inhumane and expensive form of death sentence. If you desire revenge and torture that's your way to go.

On the other hand, I think 15 years in prison is a pretty long time to realize what you have done, to regret it and possibly change for the better. In a scenario without perspective you as a prisoner feel completely detached from society and instead of maybe having an epiphany one day, you'll rather feel more and more hatred.

Sure, if you're still as bad of a person at the end of your sentence, then you can't be released in order to protect society from you.

If I were a victim, I'd probably feel better knowing that my offender is released from prison, feels guilty and deeply regrets the crime. At least in comparison to someone that is proud of what happened, full of hate and is just waiting for a chance to get at me again.

[–] flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was thinking of that guy who raped her multiple times and had HIV. I really need that guy to have more than "some time to think about what you've done" because he'd probably jerk off to it. :(

[–] rbn@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I don't say I don't understand your feelings. People seeking revenge is a natural impulse. It's just not what the German system aims for.

[–] DurbanPoison@feddit.nl -1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Are German prisons as scary as US (from what I've seen on TV) prisons or South African Prisons?

I'd rather die than spend two seconds in Pollsmoor prison.

[–] homoludens@feddit.org 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Are German prisons as scary as US (from what I’ve seen on TV) prisons or South African Prisons?

Nope, not even close from what I hear about the US prison system. It still sucks obviously and we just had a scandal in Augsburg where inmates have been tortured (beatings, not enough water provided, forced to stay naked, sleep on the floor etc).

[–] rbn@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, I think there are some that are comparable to mid-class hotels and some that are a lower standard. But in general none should be as bad that you'd rather die if you didn't want to die before your imprisonment.

[–] Sternout@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago

Yes and rightfully so. The punishment is taking away the freedom to move and not torture or slavery as it can be in the US.

Here's a great video that addresses US vs German prisons:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CmB0InEf2GM

[–] knatschus@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago

I've seen a 60 minutes episode comparing German and US prisons on YouTube can recommend.

It's very different.

[–] synapse1278@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In France, the punishments do not communicate. If one is found guilty of multiple charges, only the highest punishment is applied. Also the law specifies maximum punishments for the various crimes.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wait, really? If you kill three people vs one it's the same sentence? That seems a bit odd. What's the deterrent from just committing the same crime 50x?

[–] synapse1278@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In the case of murder, the sentence is up to life in prison. So, in this case it will depend on the circumstances. Accidentally killing someone will not give you the same punishment as murdering several people.

Let's say, if you do a robbery and kill someone, you, Robert gives you 2 years in prison and murder 20 years (I am making the numbers up, I don't actually know) then you will be sentence for only 20 years (because this already includes 5 years).

[–] john89@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

So if you also rape someone during that robbery, you wouldn't receive any additional punishment?

Wow.

[–] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think the body horror of a Warhammer 40k servitor where you are trapped in an unending waking nightmare forced to perform a menial task completely unable to move or talk by removing your humanity and agency to be an independent person by replacing body parts with crude machinery, and kept alive unable to sleep with drugs in constant unending pain and anguish, and unable to interact with people consistently for years due to being placed within a random distant cold industrial alcove, is the proper punishment for rapists.

Edit: unable to scream and forced to speak through an AI voice encoder, like these people. They all look the same, but its implied they are different people because the brutal process to create servitors strips an individual of their unique identity.

[–] john89@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

With that said, the US prison system is archaic and punitive, so I might need to re-evaluate my views.

In this instance, the US justice system wins out because it discourages continuing to do more crimes.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

That's what you'd think, discourages. But it doesn't.

A preventative system is always better than punitive.

[–] magikmw@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

20 years is plenty to uproot anyone's life.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I think most people really underestimate how long 20 years in prison is. For all intents and purposes, he's leaving prison in a casket.

[–] Laser@feddit.org 43 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I like how the headline's structure makes it sound as if "in France" was part of the punishment. Reminds me of "Fistful of Yen".

Take him to ~~Detroit~~ France!

[–] Branquinho@lemmy.eco.br 23 points 1 week ago

Gisèle - Person of the year

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is good, but the sentences should be ~2x as long. Still, a win in my book. Gisèle is a hero for this.

[–] SecretSauces@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The dude is 72. He won't even make it the full length of his current sentencing

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

On principle it's still wrong, but at least in practice that's justice served.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] sudneo@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The rapist kept videos and pictures I believe. There was tons of proof for everything he (and the others) did. I can see why this was relatively straightforward (in addition to have a big - deserved - amount of attention).

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 points 6 days ago

The husband also pleaded guilty (I think).

[–] Magister@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

he should have had 20 + 10 years per co-defendants found guilty, so 530 years in prison.

[–] sudneo@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago

That's not how the justice system works in most (all?) Europe. Crimes are not a point system where you redeem "prizes", and the sentence is based on the particular crime committed, not the sum of all individual counts.

Many countries are also very rarely giving life sentences because they have generally very little point (no possibility to re-enter society=no rehabilitation possible) in addition to create other problems (like a complete disincentive to good behavior in prison - since literally nothing worse can happen to you).

[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago

What's up with these fantasy numbers? You do realize, that there is a maximum time people can spend in prison, because they will die at some point?

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Isn't he probably less than 20 years away from dying anyway?