this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
496 points (86.6% liked)

politics

19243 readers
2350 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jerakor@startrek.website 333 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Some sort of camp to help ADHD folks work on their concentration?

[–] distantsounds@lemmy.world 95 points 1 month ago

Laughed too hard at this. It’s a Focus Group!!!

[–] jewbacca117@lemmy.world 49 points 1 month ago

call it a focus village or soemthing

[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I imagine a terrible, awful future Forest Gump remake.

“They had these camps that helped folks with their concentration or something like that. They said I was a shine-ning example, so I got to meet the president of the United States, again.”

“They tell me this guy is the best example. Got treated, got rich in shrimp. What a guy! Our camps are great, the best camps in all the world.”

Camera pans to Trump shaking hands with Kim Jong Un.

“In Korea, everybody got these pic-tures of their leader on the wall. We got those in Alabama too.”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yarr@feddit.nl 169 points 1 month ago (39 children)

I fucking HATE these clickbait headlines. Read the dang article and look at the quotes:

"I’m going to create these wellness farms where they can go to get off of illegal drugs, off of opiates, but also illegal drugs, other psychiatric drugs, if they want to, to get off of SSRIs, to get off of benzos, to get off of Adderall, and to spend time as much time as they need — three or four years if they need it— to learn to get reparented, to reconnect with communities," he said during the broadcast. (emphasis added)

RFK is a total whackjob, but it's pretty clear he's talking about some kind of voluntary "farm therapy" (which probably isn't demonstrably effective anyway) and not a concentration camp.

PLEASE we got enough bombastic language and clickbait over the Biden years. There are PLENTY of things wrong with the actual quote above without taking us into clickbait territory.

Let's criticize him on the grounds of being scientific but proposing very un-scientific actions. Let's criticize him for proposing ineffective solutions, but please, focus on his ACTUAL statement instead of trying to fluff it into some goddamn headline.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Time to add futurism.com to my block list. What a useless rag.

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 15 points 1 month ago

100% They are part of the death of journalism. Inaccurate, hyped headlines that disagree with the body of the article. Designed to get "engagement" and not to inform. Fuck them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

Voluntary, as in NYPD saying you’ll be arrested if you don’t voluntarily go into their overcrowded bedbug homeless shelter?

This is not as benign as you think.

[–] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Although these wellness farms might seem like a worthwhile idea on paper, there are plenty of ways these kinds of systems could be rife with abuse. It's also unclear how different they would really be from the rehabilitation facilities that already exist across the country, and RFK's claims that most of the issues come down to not eating organic food also don't seem to be based on hard science.

https://www.distractify.com/p/rfk-wellness-farms

Means well but it sounds here like they'll be volunteering at a farm for 3-4 uears, wasting their time

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Oh yeah... "volunteering."

And for "as much time as they need."

Doesn't seem ominous at all from a guy with a brainworm in a government that's being jizzed on by the whole for-profit-prison industry. I'm sure they'll have no interest in these "wellness farms".

Arbeit macht frei.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

can we report this sort of thing here? downvoting has never worked.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Stop fucking sane washing him. "If they want to" is a dubious statement coming from anyone in this authoritarian administration.

The fact that he brings up "reparenting", it seems fairly obvious that this is going to be done by authority of the state. He's talking about taking people's kids away from them if they medicate their children as recommended by their doctors.

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 18 points 1 month ago

Stop fucking sane washing him

You'll notice I called him a "total whackjob". I do not say he is sane. However, I wish to criticize what he ACTUALLY said instead of some bombastic caricature of his plan. In no way do I support or endorse RFK, but let's be accurate with our criticism.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (34 replies)
[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 167 points 1 month ago (6 children)

"I’m going to create these wellness farms where they can go to get off of illegal drugs, off of opiates, but also illegal drugs, other psychiatric drugs, if they want to, to get off of SSRIs, to get off of benzos, to get off of Adderall, and to spend time as much time as they need — three or four years if they need it — to learn to get reparented, to reconnect with communities," he said during the broadcast.

Isn’t it neat how he mixes in prescribed medical treatments? Neato.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 85 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Uh yeah, no.

I once thought it might be an idea to try and back off from 100mg sertraline to 50mg sertraline and on day two I wanted to strangle people. You can take my SSRIs from my cold dead hands.

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Yeah, I'm on 300mg sertraline daily, and I sometimes have trouble getting my prescription filled (understandable, it's a way bigger dose than usual)

But if I'm not on it, the suicidal thoughts usually start on day 3

So if they were to take my SSRIs, I would quickly be killed by my own cold, dead hands

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 16 points 1 month ago

I'm going to try and write on my brain to turn those thoughts entirely on the people who decided I shouldn't get my meds anymore.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Have you tried going outside and snapping out of it?"

-RFK Jr., probably

So school shootings are a mental health problem, so he wants to do the opposite of help. Goddamn, make these people make sense.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 61 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (16 children)

He's a big believer in the whole "keeping people on drugs isn't the fix" kind of thinking. It's short-sighted and ignorant of the fact that a lot of people on them have a net benefit to function in society.

What he is proposing is something far more stupid akin to "Well look at me. I've never needed these drugs, and I'm totally fine. WTF, people?"

If you want a country that is doing the proper work to stop jumping to long-term prescriptions as problem solvers, I'm all for that. DO NOT confuse that with these dumb shit he's suggesting though.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

"Well look at me. I've never needed these drugs [He does], and I'm totally fine [He's not]. WTF, people?"

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Yes, but he THINKS he is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What he is proposing is something far more stupid akin to “Well look at me. I’ve never needed these drugs, and I’m totally fine. WTF, people?”

Except he looks like a reanimated corpse and sounds like a frog that died on a log in a bog.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also, "get reparented" is some very sinister cult programming (ie brain washing) language..

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 24 points 1 month ago

It's all the same when you believe in conspiracy theories, are not a Dr., and had a brain worm die in your head.

Also, how in the hell do we not have at least a medical degree as the very 1st requirement for a position that controls/shapes medical care for the country?!

... to spend time as much time as they need — three or four years if they need it — to learn to get reparented, to reconnect with communities ...

Is this paid time/leave? Who does he envision paying for his "wellness farms"? Or is this him envisioning everyone creating some commune farm where everyone is eating mushrooms and killing bears?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Arbiter@lemmy.world 136 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So his solution to ADHD is a concentration camp?

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 56 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sure, that way they can learn to concentrate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BenReilly97@lemmy.world 118 points 1 month ago (6 children)

And a tax on cannabis sales would fund these farms, he proposed.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but... is he really suggesting a federal tax on a federally illegal substance?

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 79 points 1 month ago (5 children)

You hope he is just being clever and indirectly talking about legalizing cannabis, but you know that in reality he is just so incompetent that he has no idea what he is talking about.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 64 points 1 month ago (2 children)

A lot of Americans have to pass a drug test to get a new job. Perhaps RFK would like if we applied this reasoning to Trump's whole cabinet?

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 48 points 1 month ago

They’re skipping the FBI checks. Safe to say there will be no drug tests.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 53 points 1 month ago

So they're just already saying the "camps" part out loud, eh? I guess when you have Hitler's playbook, you can move faster than Hitler did.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 42 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Is he not aware that the fascist pumpkin he will be working for pops those like breath mints?? Please do send that rapist con man to a labor camp.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago

Yes I am sure not being hypocrites is high on their list of concerns

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 month ago (2 children)

As a minority with ADHD I guess I'm fucked.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Summer Camp 2025 here we come! /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago

Nothing to see here, just politics as usual, the liberals are just trying to scare everyone. /s

[–] Today@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago (3 children)

They pay your mortgage and buy your kids food while you're there?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago (3 children)

This is part of some rural grift facilities which probably started with "trouble teens". In recent years I've seen reports of these "farms" for "distressed" women. It's usually a place with Ranch in the name. Example: https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2021/11/18/the-christian-maternity-ranch-in-texas-is-a-disaster-in-the-making/

Permaculture farms, for example, are already well known for relying on abusive work conditions. See Joel Salatin:

https://medium.com/permaculture-3-0/fall-of-a-hero-f9ac80a08c0c

https://www.motherjones.com/food/2020/11/joel-salatin-chris-newman-farming-rotational-grazing-agriculture/

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah, I already started weaning myself off my depression meds. Went cold turkey once, and that was a nightmare. They're planning to kill the VA, so fuck our service. I'm never getting cut off again. I'll switch to natural alternatives, thank you.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Phew, glad my psychiatrist prescribed me Ritalin.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Godric@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] kamiheku@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If he comes for my antidepressants he can haul me off but he can't make me cooperate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 month ago

what the hell. staying in Canada.

[–] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 month ago

Trade offer: you take my Prozac, I go off the deep end and take some fucks with me.

[–] Boxscape@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Isn't this the plot of A Scanner Darkly?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Fuck that.

I strongly dislike how the argument hinges on the very movable goalpost of "illegal" drugs. It has this awful moralizing "protect the kids while we destroy privacy", vibe to it.

At first I though this would require an end-run on HIPAA, but all they really need to do is re-schedule a bunch of therapeutic drugs. Or ignore the FDA entirely and just enforce a ban by edict (somehow) through a different agency. I don't think we've ever seen federal agencies openly disagree like that before, but I think it's possible. Also: big pharma may have something to say about all this.

Like a lot of the nonsense coming from this cabinet, it'll test the crap out of state's rights.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›