this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
487 points (95.5% liked)

politics

19089 readers
5277 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 79 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

i fucking called it.

https://lemmy.world/comment/13331955

turns out the answer to my question is “less than a week”

[–] Moah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Come on, Russian money wasn’t involved in ..

Oh

OHH

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

To own the libs, they sold their soul.

[–] MurderCapitalism@feddit.org 24 points 1 day ago

When you realize memes shouldn't have influence on your voting decision...

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You broke it, you bought it.

[–] PagingDoctorLove@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah except we're all going to pay.

America even does socialism the worst

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, I’m also being forced to buy it, even though I didn’t break it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 95 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Bloody hell, this is the US version of Brexit... this world would be such a better place if people just did the bare minimum of reading into what they were actually voting for before they fucking voted!

Also, seeing the other top searches being about the tariffs would have me creasing if it weren't so disappointingly stupid that these peoole seemingly knew nothing about Trumps most advertised economic policy before (assumably) voting for him

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

Whenever I see all the trash on the side of the road, I know why the world is that way.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

No, the US version of Brexit was Trump's first term, since they both happened in the same year.

This is just people saying they know exactly how bad Brexit went the first time and they want that again.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Saleh@feddit.org 61 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The relative numbers are worth little without knowing the underlying numbers. If it went from 100 to 700 people, that is still negligble. Also crazy how people immediately take that as a base to remove voters rights unless they pass some sort of test. Nothing could go wrong with stripping voters rights amirite?

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 day ago (4 children)

For all future elections I suggest we have one voter - me. I promise to deliver the optimally democratic outcome.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah, the Vetinari principle. One man, one vote.

Vetinari is that man, and he has that vote.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yup, and I promise quality boots for all.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

For wearing or for licking?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don’t know how trustworthy these search trends are. For example if you type in “where did I put my” it will complete all kinds of stuff like “keys” and “wallet” and “passport” which seems to imply that people are regularly asking Google where they placed items in their own house.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 5 points 18 hours ago

The searches spike after every election and this one was no different than any other year.

Compared to shrimp scampi, an example search I stole from another thread on this topic, it's pretty clear the searches are meaningless and not tied to this particular result.

https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=US&q=How+do+I+change+my+vote%2CShrimp+scampi&hl=en

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is this the "Find out" stage then?

Actions have consequences. Sad people had to figure it out this way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is all bullshit, designed to start another wave of outrage. Even after the election, we've gotta have more stuff to rage about. News these days is just rage all day every day, no matter what.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 10 points 19 hours ago

I've said it the whole election cycle. The news downplayed every Trump gaffe because they wanted him back to fuel the outrage click machine. They wanted that sweet revenue back after 4 boring years of Biden just ya know doing his fucking job.

[–] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I had to have new anxiety meds called in because all of the political stuff is sending me into panic attacks. I've been avoiding politics as much as possible since the day after the election because it causes so much anxiety.

[–] Brosplosion@lemm.ee 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

This post caught my attention and decided to look at it despite my anxiety

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 203 points 1 day ago (3 children)

"Somebody shit in my pants."

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 35 points 1 day ago

Once again, these are the a validation headlines that create and support echo chambers. Honestly, what does it matter now?

We already know the regret is strong on this nation and will only get worse.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 163 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Of course, let's not let things like knowledge or consequences get in the way of reactionary & spiteful arrogance informed only by propaganda induced fear and hate, emotions know to prevent rational thought /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 38 points 1 day ago

The republican anti-education campaign bears fruit I see.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 44 points 1 day ago

God I fucking hate humans

[–] whithom@discuss.online 19 points 1 day ago

I love it. America’s last hope and people failed. Fuck this place. Let the civil war begin.

[–] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 131 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The article claims "in droves" then doesn't give a number, or even an estimate.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 94 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Yeah, because google is vague.

Not sure what "100" means, but that's what it peaked at.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago

Here are a couple comparisons that maybe give it more relevance:

Image

Image

[–] WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca 55 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That is a percentage score. So you take the highest level of searches and it will always be 100% and all lesser scores are in comparison to that score of 100(%). If you can find out what the actual number of searches are for that one score, you can derive the approximate number of searches in the other places. It shows an informational tool tip on desktop.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Cuberoot@lemmynsfw.com 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are we all just assuming these searches are from people who regret their votes and hoped to be able to change it?

I double checked my ballot before submitting it, with full knowledge that irrevocability is the price of anonymity. Nevertheless, I might use similar search terms if I was curious how many other voters, possibly in other states or with different political alignments, had written about regretting their votes. Or, perhaps, ... if I was doing research for a post-election article about the topic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago (4 children)

How are people this stupid?something in the water?

[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 55 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 32 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Some 'murican cities are unironically trying to get rid of fluoride from water. You know, the thing that also goes in toothpaste and is overall good for keeping teeth healthy

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago

RFK Jr, who is likely to be our new head of health and human services, wants to ban it nationally.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] eletes@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago

Years of GOP meddling with education, which is only gonna nose dive when dept of education gets dismantled

load more comments (1 replies)

"How to unsink the Titanic"

[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What ya'll upset for now? The economy was so good under Trump! Didn't you want him to deport all those "poisonous" immigrants. He's your retribution. And, besides, it's not like Harris would have been any better, because they're the same anyway.

/s

[–] frezik@midwest.social 23 points 1 day ago

Something is seriously wrong with civics education in this country. People in power have no incentive to fix it. At least naturalized citizens have to take a fairly stringent test.

load more comments
view more: next ›