affiliate

joined 1 year ago
[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

this was also me in my 20s when someone asked if i wanted to go out drinking

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

always remember, <=> is the three-way comparison operator. it takes two arguments.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

i would disagree that math problems only have one strategy for getting to the answer. there are many things, particularly in more abstract math, which can be understood in multiple different ways. the first example that comes to mind is the fundamental theorem of algebra. you can prove it using complex analysis, algebraic topology, or abstract algebra. all the proofs are quite different and rely on deep results from different fields of math.

i think the same thing holds in the less abstract areas of math, it’s just that people are often only taught one strategy for solving a problem and so they believe that’s all there is.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

exactly how i feel about it too. the 5 minute long segment that was just nature footage with weird visual filters was also particularly hard to watch.

i also found the whole obelisk thing super repetitive. i was hoping that they would go into more detail about the obelisks, and explore the topic more. but it ended up feeling like they were asking the question “what’s a list of weird times and places where we could put an obelisk”, and that was the extent of it.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 14 points 8 hours ago

it would be a pretty funny post for the full 5 minutes it would last until it got stalin sorted out of lemmy.ml

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

i wonder what the inverse of the letters in the english alphabet are. since it has a non-prime number of letters (26 to be exact), we know that some letters won’t have inverses. i wonder which letters don’t have inverses. i guess it would be pretty easy to find out if you use the standard alphabet ordering and then port the alphabet over to ℤ/26ℤ, but that’s not a particularly satisfying answer.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

i can sympathize with this. i also didn’t like many of the tarantino movies that i’ve seen for similar reasons. the feet stuff also doesn’t help his case.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

yeah cohomology can be particularly rough. look on the bright side though, at least you now have the tools to answer this question:

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

taxi driver felt like it was asking the question “what if we made a movie where nothing happens?”. and apparently, if you make the main character “disturbed” enough, the answer is that the movie becomes one of the greatest films of all time.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

i also wasn’t very impressed by chinatown. i remember feeling like i spent the whole time waiting for the movie to “start”, and then it ended

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

it’s nice to know i’m not the only one

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

thank you! i also couldn’t stand that movie. watching oppenheimer felt like watching a 3 hour trailer for oppenheimer. i can’t understand nolan’s refusal to let a scene last for more than 1 minute

 
 
view more: next ›