Is it necessary to specify “a mother”?
Do they also mention Adolf Hitler, a son, loving boyfriend, and proud dad to a golden retriever, waged war on Western Europe?
this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
436 points (97.6% liked)
politics
18780 readers
3164 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
"Rachel Powell, a woman who rawdogged her husband multiple times for the purpose of procreation, was found guilty today." doesn't have the same ring to it.
for the purpose of procreation
...idk my money's drunken/coked out/etc sex for the purpose of milking a shred of dopamine from her sorry excuse for a brain.
Did not need that image. Kudos
if you wanted to get mildly conspiratorial about it, you could say they phrased it that way to make you feel sympathy/pity for her because they don’t want you to think she did anything wrong
I don't think that's conspiratorial whatsoever. It's pretty plainly the intent.
Same as they did for Kim Potter when she went to trial. Cardigan sweater, dressed like everyone's grandmother, looked like she should be offering you cookies every day as you rode your bike by her house.
i definitely agree but i try to hedge my bets cuz you never know how ppl will respond to that kind of information in TYOOL 2023
Makes me less sympathetic for her. Her having kids though & being part of that MAGA culture is VERY concerning though. But you know.. there are lots of men & women that don’t think too deeply about politics & many that don’t share their spouses politics as well. It surprises me - but I honestly don’t think someone wakes up crazy one day.
Also spouses that get surprised later most likely didn’t know because they were too afraid to ask &/or probe into meaningful & telling areas for one reason or another. And many just go along to get along, & I hate that as I couldn’t be attracted to anyone w/ shitty political beliefs & I feel like others should do the same so us that care aren’t stuck looking for partners or a partner unknowingly being w/ a crazy person.
Or, "She's a mother? Those poor kids. I have kids, I would never do that." It's probably "they're putting away a mother!" but one could hope.
I would suggest adding -fucker to the end of that description.
I don't care if she was a mother. Guess that just means you shouldn't have done the crime. Bank robbers don't get to go home to their kids, either.
It must be her only contribution to the world. Attempting to overthrow the government aaaaaaaand making a baby.
💀
I agree with @picassowary, but I also read this as complicating the virtuousness surrounding motherhood. We put mothers on a moral pedestal for being sacrificial, yadda yadda, but here is a mother violating that expectation of purity, good sense, decorum, and sacrifice. What questions can we now invite?
How vile are mothers on the far right? How tantalizing is the Kool aid on the far right to seduce virtuous mothers into debased insurrection? How troubling is white supremacy that white women participate in it because they are rewarded for being complicit?
The list goes on if you read the inclusion of the word mother as a way to violate the expectations of motherhood more than read it as a pull for sympathy.
its quite straightfotward. Having offspring has no significant relation to how virtuous a person is.
The moral pedestral is a thing particularly peddeled in the US (but also other countries) to justify a society that enables a middle class culture still revolving around unemployed stay at home women, often dependant on their husband and living in a state of purposelessness beyonf "being a mom".
It is the toxic femininity to accompany toxic masculinity of a conservative/far right society
Makes sense for sure but I gotta say, I do like a warning that these human diapers have offspring. Staying frosty.
Maybe she has no other achievements in her life?
I like to think of it in the sense that they are saying the children are being saved from this psychopath. Like "Can you believe this fuck procreated?"
Perhaps because it was her primary occupation, even if it's not considered formal employment. The name Rachel Powell isn't very unique, so it doesn't leave much other information to identify her from all the other people named Rachel Powell in the US.
It might be an attempt to elicit sympathy, but I dont think so in this case. It might even be more of a subtle way to shame her for not having paid employment.
Since they felt the need to say she's a mother, we should mention what a piece of shit she is for helping attempt a coup while her children likely depend on her. What an awful mother she is.
Is there a website that tracks all of these seditionists and their sentences?
💀
We got a federated equivalent to that? Because we could use it.
💀
If anyone else is wondering what kind of a penalty she faces:
The 40-year old Powell faces a maximum sentence of 47 years in prison for the charges, maximum fines of up to $600,000, and up to seven years supervised release.
The obstruction charge carries a maximum sentence of 20 years, $250,000 fines, and 3 years supervised release; destruction of US property over $1,000, 10 years maximum, $250,000 maximum fine, 3 years supervised release; entering a restricted building or property with a dangerous weapon 10 years, entering a restricted building/property one year, and disorderly conduct carries a maximum sentence of 6 months, $100,000 fine and one year supervised release. source
She FA'd and now she FO'd what happens when one attempts to overthrow the government.
view more: next ›