this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
324 points (95.3% liked)

politics

19090 readers
3952 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Despite his conservative platform, Donald Trump made unexpected gains among Gen Z voters. Exit polls showed a shift, with young men favoring Trump by 2 points, a reversal from Biden’s previous lead.

Gen Z’s support for Trump may have been underestimated, as an Axios poll found nearly half of Gen Z voters lied about their vote, with young men more likely to support Trump quietly.

Trump connected with young men through appearances on popular podcasts and endorsements from social media influencers.

Disillusionment with the economy and frustration with the Democratic Party’s approach to working-class issues also drove some Gen Z voters to seek change, with Trump capitalizing on these sentiments.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mammothmothman@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 days ago

Secret? What secret? Its been fucking obvious for the last 10 years!

[–] pinkystew@reddthat.com 8 points 2 days ago

I love how the picture is an attractive able bodied young white man with facial hair. I am so tired.

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 168 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The only people this was a "secret" too are people who weren't looking or listening.

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 44 points 3 days ago

It sucks how much people are ignoring this.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Well, a lot of people - mostly people in a certain age range - kept saying how magical the younguns are, how media savvy and how morally upright they were, and how they were going to get things right where the stupid boomers, Gen X and Gen Y got it all wrong...

And while I'd like to believe that, I've seen little evidence of better instruction anywhere K-12 or in higher education about logical fallacies and teaching about a good media diet. Being able to install an app on your phone doesn't make anyone media savvy; these things are designed so nearly any idiot can use it.

Why anyone ever thought that "the kids" were going to be able to have a better filter than older generations is like assuming kids plopped in front of Saturday morning TV that was meant to PREY on them were more "media savvy" about that environment....sigh.

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm a highschool teacher. This generation of students isn't even more tech savvy, let alone media savvy. Your exactly correct about the design of modern technology; this generation grew up with tablets and iPhones, they have no idea how to do some incredibly basic tasks unless an app does it for them, and they no understanding of really core - and in my mind simple - computer use concepts like what a folder is, or how find a file on a device and attach it to an email.

We've begun teaching media literacy in the highschools, but it's unfortunately falling into the pitfalls or most education. We pull specialized articles from sources that students would literally never engage with, discuss how to read such articles and how they can be misleading, and never make the connection to the kind of content that students actually absorb. Students are day-in, day-out learning from influencers and social media, and we're handing them articles from 2010 reprinted into textbooks and news posts they'd never have the patience to read, while continually reinforcing that cell phones are toys that are meant to stay out of the classroom and used in private or with small groups of friends.

The kids aren't alright, but that's not on them.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

this generation grew up with tablets and iPhones, they have no idea how to do some incredibly basic tasks unless an app does it for them

Yep, I've been completely underwhelmed with what constitutes being "tech savvy" for a lot of people in that age range. For some of them, if it isn't a product (and a popular one), it's like it doesn't register for them. They think in terms of brands when it comes to technology.

Tech aside, I would love for schools at K-12 and at higher levels of learning to incorporate critical thinking and media literacy instruction. It would be an uphill battle though, probably at the very outset, but certainly after reactionary parents start noticing that their kids don't think just like them. For some reason, people seem to believe that school is just a glorified job training program, and that anything outside of that is off-limits, meaning, their kids are expected to come out believing the exact same shit going into school as when they come out. I view that as an education FAILURE if a student comes out believing exactly what their parents believe in the end without ever having questioned any of it. Of course, if children deviate even slightly from what their parents/pastor/community believes, the wingers think that is "indoctrination".

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Kids should be forced to go through what I did to get on the Internet. Learn how modems work. Type A:\install.exe and swap out a dozen floppies before you play that new game you love. (While you're waiting you can read the manual.) Want a porn video? Learn how to use a downloader and be prepared to wait a few days. Want a new machine? Build it yourself.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

I have written and moderated courseware for education students focusing on digital literacy. A requirement for graduation, pass/fail. I was so excited to start the project. I was so disappointed by the end.

The teachers to-be had very little digital literacy overall, and very little ability to recognize that or care. Too many passed, by design of the department heads. It was saddening to realize that most of them were headed out into the world with indifference to social media processes and little ability to recognize digital manipulation, and to share that indifference with children.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Just a few years ago this generation was walking out of schools to protest our lack of action against climate change. The shift is crazy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 106 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Secret republicans?

Everyone I know who listens to Joe Rogan is clearly Republican if they aren't stating it themselves.

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

I’ve been listening to Rogan since 2017ish and he has totally shifted rightward. I used to listen to every episode because it was usually either funny or informative. Now it’s preachy and just captured by right wing talking points that border on conspiracy theories. My takeaway is that he listens to his comedian friends instead of his more educated guests, which is a microcosm of America. His show is only as good as the guest and subject matter… Neil DeGrasse Tyson? Fantastic. Trump? Problematic. It just comes across that since he is now in the running to be a billionaire with good investing strategy, he is now switching his interests and views to match. If you recognize a guest, definitely listen, but skip over everything else.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Didn't Joe Rogan endorse Bernie Sanders at one point? The guy seems to be all over the map.

[–] moseschrute@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I went through a Rogan phase years ago back when he endorsed Bernie. He definitely was a little controversial even back then. I stopped listing as he got more controversial. I tuned back in briefly for the Trump and Rogan interview just out of curiosity. I was shocked to see how far Rogan has fallen.

For context, I’m a Gen Z man. I’m really disappointed the way my fellow Gen Z men are going.

I’ve gone on my own political journey being raised pretty conservative and becoming liberal as I met more diverse people. So honestly maybe Rogan should have always been a red flag, but I did look up to him for a while. I really wanted him to be a progressive voice, but it’s blatantly obvious now he is just as bad as the rest.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Yeah i gave the Trump and Musk one a listen in the interest of hearing what they are saying. Oof. Needs an independant real time fact checker. Bad.

There aren't too many others getting much market share to voice other takes.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

He endorses whoever likes him the most. He's a moron. And so are his remaining fans.

Someone on Lemmy yesterday insisted that he was actually smart. When I asked for evidence, they mocked me for asking for evidence. That's the level of intellect we're talking about here.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Agreed, but, to be fair, what constitutes "smart" is not really objective. It can mean different things to different people and the evidence to back it up may not be acceptable evidence to those you debate.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I wasn't the one insisting he was smart. It's not really up to me to define it. They did not. They decided instead to mock the idea of asking for evidence for something.

Edit: Also, I provided links with quotes and a video to show what a fucking idiot he is.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 89 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My little sister actually dodged a date with one of these chucklefucks only a few days ago. I think they were supposed to meet on Friday for the first time, but she asked if they could meet this coming week because she was slightly freaking out about the implications of the election results… dude straight up admitted he was excited, and that he was a MAGA/MAHA (I had to look that up - apparently it’s “make America healthy again” (????????????)). Instablocked that fucker lmao.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I wonder how many start trying to hide their magabrain, their magagear, their media diet, etc...for the early part of dating.

If my experience is any indication, they won't be able to keep their yap shut about it for long, and....welcome to getting ghosted, swiped left on, and just generally having a very, very long dry streak. :)

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 days ago

That's why they want to remove all agency from women

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Any woman who's terrified by the results needs to adopt South Korea's 4Ds policy. Let's see how these incels like an even smaller dating pool.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 71 points 3 days ago (2 children)

There was a reason they dipped deep into social media and podcasts, Dems didn't understand this.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Oh, but she went on The View! So, she's all set.

[–] sloppy_diffuser@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Less public / archived spaces as well. Videogame lobbies were rampant with Trump / MAGA messaging in 2019. Not sure what its like now as I quit all online gaming. Anyone 14-17 during that period who are now of voting age has likely gotten a massive dose of right wing propaganda.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 19 points 3 days ago

That was Steve Bannons plan way back from 2015-16. He was the one to really push for indoctrinating the gamers and making gamer culture and maga anti-woke one in the same...

Now you can't even go into a single steam discussions forum for a new popular game without seeing multiple "go woke go broke" and "is this game woke?" posts... Makes me sick...

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 65 points 3 days ago (2 children)

In other words: brainless morons let Rogan take a dump in their skull. It's like the people that used to let Rush take a giant shit in their heads on the daily.

Remember how everyone was telling us how magical the next "generation" is? Yeah, I wasn't really buying it, either. I fucking hate that Maher is right about this kind of thing, though.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 31 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Maher is right about this...

Maher is an insufferable cunt who just hates all young people. Broken clock and all that... I couldn't take listening to him even like 4+ years ago, I can't imagine how much more annoying he's gotten as he gets older.

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I can't believe he still has a show tbh I gotta wonder who tf is watching him

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

Cmon, you gotta admit Tom Sawyer is a jam.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 38 points 3 days ago (12 children)

Young men have become more right wing for sure.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago

2 percent is not the wave they want it to be. Especially not with 10 million Democrats staying home.

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

...this was never a secret.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It sure was to the democratic party.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 21 points 2 days ago

Call them what they are : boys

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (3 children)

But Lemmy told me Gen Z was going to save us all this election.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If only it was just Lemmy...I was being told by so many self-styled authorities that this generation had some kind of magical properties that no one that came before them has had, and just by virtue of "getting it" when it came to consuming things like social media (or something).

This is dumb. It's always been dumb. The target demo is the target; they aren't savvier than anyone else is that is a target. So when boomers were saying stupid shit about how Gen X "just gets it" when it comes to something like MTV, or the early days of the (privatized) 'net, that was just as stupid. MTV was a product and Gen X was the target demo, emphasis on target. The elitists quickly figured out a way to monetize the (privatized) 'net with some of the first target demo being boomers and Gen X.

It's no different today. Without serious education in critical thinking, this stuff is only weaponized against the target demo, they don't know shit about the new product any more than anyone else does.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 12 points 3 days ago

Tbf Gen Z women showed up.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gluca23@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

They underestimated the puppeteer who bought a social media for push hateful propaganda.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›