this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
151 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10180 readers
366 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
151
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by Quexotic@beehaw.org to c/politics@beehaw.org
 

I feel like this is probably pretty effective. I feel like it should be a thing.

E: see also https://beehaw.org/post/16953380 E2: https://19thnews.org/2024/11/4b-movement-south-korea-social-media-trump-presidency/

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 28 points 5 days ago

Me, a lesbian: Aktivsm

[–] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I mean, considering how many incels voted for trump, I think we're pretty much already there. Many of the young men who voted red this election already have no close relationships with any women their age. Obviously women should exercise their autonomy as they see fit. I don't expect it to change how anyone votes.

I'll probably be downvoted for this, but progressives have spent the last several years actively shutting down lines of communication with men, particularly white men. For the best of reasons, sure, but it hasn't been an effective strategy for winning elections.

Maybe this would sway some group of center-left men who didn't bother voting, but realistically I expect it will have no effect on the ongoing polarization, or exagerrate it.

[–] xor@infosec.pub 31 points 5 days ago (7 children)

so, because punishing all women is bad, it’s a good idea to punish all men?
here’s an alternative: don’t fuck republicans… they’re the ones trying to control women.

[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

It's not punishing anyone as much as asserting our bodily autonomy, but go off. Targeting Republicans means no pressure is applied to anyone else to change society. Not every woman will participate in the strike. The effects of it have to be wide reaching.

It's a widespread denial of the institutions behind gender relationships. Saying that the system is dangerous for women and refusing to participate in it.

[–] xor@infosec.pub 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

but go off.

oh look, zero chance that you’re actually trying to have a conversation… yaaay internet.

Not every woman will participate in the strike.

almost none will, but if they did, it’s not going to be republican women….

[–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 20 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (13 children)

They could’ve been telling you to go off because the not all men argument is unnecessary and pedantic. Obviously it’s not all men, but it’s enough of them that nobody should have to specify only the misogynists, racists, rapists, etc.

It has always been bizarre to me that good people lump themselves in with them. You don’t have to be defensive! You can understand nuance!

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] AwakenedAce@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (9 children)

They're not obligated to date men though, if they want to participate in 4B then I don't see what's wrong with that. They are allowed to assert their bodily autonomy, it's a form of protest against how they are treated

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

Its not punishing all men, its punishing conservative men.

4B doesnt neex to apply for leftist men

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

You really don't think guys won't lie to get laid?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] xor@infosec.pub 1 points 4 days ago

lol… sure….

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] InevitableList@beehaw.org 16 points 5 days ago (4 children)

It's interesting that the response to men going their own way (MGTOW) is indifference or at most pity whilst WGTOW are met with hostility.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Except for a million articles like:

The ‘Men Going Their Own Way’ movement is the Taliban of the manosphere

https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/politics/article/men-going-their-own-way-movement

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 17 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The problem, if you look at the data, is lots of women voted for Trump too.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 10 points 5 days ago

White women specifically. I'm sure they're uneducated also

[–] Devi@beehaw.org 5 points 4 days ago

There's women who say they'd vote against womens right to vote, you can't trust people to vote for their best interests.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Given that the new agenda is to end birth control, no-fault divorce and spousal rape laws, a lot of women are about to have no say past the first one. Don't get married, and if you're in a bad marriage try to get out ASAP.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

So, creating a massive headache for government ~15-20 years into the future?

Or what is the point?

[–] papertowels@lemmy.one 7 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I wonder if this results in more kids being raised in brainwashy conservative families.

[–] femtech@midwest.social 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Not more kids by total but more kids by %. But it won't be enough to keep the old people and economy in its current state alive.

[–] papertowels@lemmy.one 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Is a future dominated by kids raised by these families one worth going through all this effort for?

As I mentioned in another comment, one of the conservatives I know put their kid in a captain America outfit yesterday cuz he was "defending America".

[–] femtech@midwest.social 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If this was wide spread it wouldn't matter, the 1% would not have anyone to stand on.

[–] papertowels@lemmy.one 2 points 5 days ago (4 children)

So this is more scorched earth and punitive than it is trying to fix things?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, and men who support women's right. Need to support this as well.

Seriously, look at recent events in Texas. Having sex with women while republicans are in power. It is a potential death sentence for those women.

Unless you can groove beyond doubt, one off you is infertile. And honestly, given the way some republicans are. Only trust your own eyes on the microscope when checking. Because forcing doctors to lie to women is far from beyond some of these people.

Honestly, leaving the US for a more liberal nation is the only safe option the way things are looking.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago

It won't matter when abortion is illegal and rape goes unpunished.

The future is hell for everyone.

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 27 points 5 days ago (12 children)

I feel like this is probably pretty effective. I feel like it should be a thing.

It isn't. They will simply import women from other countries. And this election alone proves the fact that all women are not a monolithic group. You're not going to get a majority to follow this trend.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 5 days ago

Well, Trump's tarrifs should make it cost ineffective to import women.

/s (sort of)

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 27 points 5 days ago (7 children)

Because young men will have a much easier time getting laid when abortion is restricted nationwide and contraceptives are harder to get 🙄 talk about shooting yourself in the dick

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›