this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
44 points (90.7% liked)

movies

1769 readers
275 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GCanuck@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No. Trey and Matt have both said they’d never work with puppets again.

[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don’t blame them. I wouldn’t make deals with puppets either—they’ve always got strings attached!

[–] GCanuck@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Get. Out. 👉

(I admit. I chuckled. )

[–] Chewbaccabra@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They swore to their fathers they'd never use it

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You'd have to drag Matt and Trey kicking and screaming back into directing with puppets again

[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

The making off of this movie is just as good as the movie itself. I fully understand why they would never do that again, but i'm glad they did. I remember that kimmy's glasses alone were like 20k. It's just overall a hassle and an expensive one at that.

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago

America is still enforcing its own systems through military means, is it not? It most definitely would work.

[–] paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

Not much has changed, yet. Twenty years from now they might need to change the team logo. For me the whole dicks and pussies spiel is still resonating.

[–] HorseRabbit@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 month ago

Probably not. I mean the whole movie was a psudo-satire about the war on terror. But there were lots of internal contradictions that made the second half age terribly. The main message of the second half was that Iraq definitely does have WMDs and America might be annoying and brash and dumb but someone has to invade the middle east to fight evil!

A sequel would either have to admit that there were no WMDs and the war on terror was open colonialism, or ignore the entire message of the first movie and pretend it never happened, or double down on saying actually it's cool for the US to invade other countries.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

God no, that film did not age particularly well. It was funny at the time, sorta, but it no longer works.

[–] Zozano@lemy.lol 9 points 1 month ago

Counterpoint:

"Matt Damon"

[–] neidu2@feddit.nl 6 points 1 month ago

Yeah, that movie was a perfectly timed parody of the War On Terror(tm). For a sequel to work today, the background must be changed.

[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ever since america won the war on terror, the movie kinda just doesn't work anymore

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 weeks ago

"Mission Accomplished"

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

I watch this every 9/11. It’s a tradition. A whack one, but hey

[–] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

I enjoy this about you.

[–] winkly@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

They should do a super hero parody with puppets. Basically team America but it’s a parody of the avengers.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago