this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
434 points (98.7% liked)

politics

18957 readers
3275 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The former president spent the weekend spewing dangerous nonsense at a rally. The press spent its weekend polishing it into palatability.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hohoho@lemmy.world 115 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Any news organization that sane-washes this nonsense is not centrist.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

But MBFC is telling me they're all centre-left, so that must be true

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

From observing MBFC I can conclude it is far right.

[–] xenoclast@lemmy.world 35 points 22 hours ago

They are corporations that make money from news entertainment AND he's all about giving them MORE power and MORE money.

He's their golden goose and their wet dream all rolled into one.

Follow the money.

[–] Coach@lemmy.world 15 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Any news organization that sane-washes this is not a "news" organization. They are a fascist's plaything.

Do better, media.

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 9 points 21 hours ago

Narrator: They didn't.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

corporations have incentives to be right wing. why would they be centrist?

also news organizations should be fair and accurate, not centrist.

[–] hohoho@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago
[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

News organizations are not supposed to be centrist, they are supposed to be neutral.

[–] hohoho@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

I completely agree with you

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

They never really were. The Bircher types have always whined that the corporate media is "the liberal media". This was and is complete nonsense, of course. Of course, to compensate for this constant whining, they have internalized this silliness and constantly steer into goofy practices like being "objective" and giving equal times to "both sides" - this only enables the pathological lying that is the norm for the right.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 60 points 1 day ago (3 children)

They analyzed how it would affect their numbers and determined it would turn off too many MAGA viewers and not attract enough other viewers to make up the difference. News for profit was always a bad idea.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Maybe this is just I dream I had but wasn't there some kind of regulation at one point that said news orgs (or departments) couldn't make a profit?

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 11 points 1 day ago

You might be thinking of the Fairness Doctrine, which has to do with the subject matter and not profits.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago

It was a dream. But a good one. Until we manage to go full communism someone will have to make something for their time and effort in order to live. But if we broke up most of the media. And put strict regulation against publicly owned companies owning or trying to pass themselves as anything relating to news. It would be a good start. Stuff being privately owned does not automatically make it more factual. But at least an owner might have a reputation that they could value. When it comes to publicly owned companies. Where the bottom line is profit. Truth and factuality are the first things sacrificed.

[–] CaptainHowdy@lemm.ee 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I think I understand your point, but if news isn't for profit, who would pay the reporters? I used to write for a newspaper and it's pretty hard work.

It can't be state sponsored, due to the conflict of interest. If the state pays for the media you couldn't trust the media to accurately report on the state.

Honestly, in good faith, wondering what the other options would be.

[–] sep@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

While there are no perfect way. It would be much less of a problem then it is now. And easier for watchdog orgs to pay attention to and call out.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Using the propaganda model... news businesses favoring profit over the public interest succeed, whilst those favoring reportorial accuracy over profits fail — and are relegated to the margins of their markets (low sales and ratings).

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 20 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

They do this shit like it's their main job. Now they've moved on to sane-washing talk of giant faucets in Canada.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 18 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I can't believe it! He was right!

[–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 7 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

what is happening right now

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 7 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

The illusion works because the support is hidden inside the flowing water

[–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 9 points 21 hours ago

yeah i meant more like the comment thread than how the "floating pouring vessel" illusion works.. my uncle had a beer can with this thing on his home bar in the 80s

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 5 points 21 hours ago

Relax I’ll call the plumber

[–] rsuri@lemmy.world 14 points 17 hours ago

It's pretty awful to see that there's basically nobody in mainstream media willing to stand up for immigrants given the vicious hate Trump and Vance are spewing at them. In past times Edward R. Murrow would end both of their careers. But now you just have some corporate talking head saying "we looked into the former president's claims and found no evidence that is true" when talking about lies that Trump/Vance picked up from actual neo nazis.