this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
345 points (95.8% liked)

Uplifting News

11033 readers
382 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 62 points 1 year ago (14 children)

I mean have prices come down at all?

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.one 81 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Inflation never went negative, so prices haven’t gone down. Positive inflation ensures prices nearly always steadily rise. The article is saying the rate of inflation is the lowest it’s been for a while which means prices are rising at the slowest pace for a while.

[–] sebinspace@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Worth noting that most nation-states will aim for an inflation rate of about ~3-4% annually to account for things like a growing population

[–] JasSmith@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

Source? Most OECD nations aim for ~2%.

[–] vladmech@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Sure glad my annual cost of living bump is 2-3%

[–] capr@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Nonsense. If the population grows then that means there would be more demand for money, not less. If inflation goes up in this scenario, then that can only mean the money supply has increased. Theres nothing wrong with deflation.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

ELI5: Price still going up. But price is going up much slower.

[–] iamsgod@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

well, if it went negative it becomes deflation

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yea I’m just pointing out that prices are not going to come down and will only keep going up albeit more slowly than before

[–] ExecutiveStapler@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

I suppose you can point that out, but it's worth saying that the deflation that'd be required to decrease prices would be way more catastrophic than the semi high inflation we experienced. With deflation people are encouraged to keep their money in the bank instead of investing or spending, which means businesses lose profits and banks become more hesitant to lend, which means businesses fail and lay off workers, which means less consumer spending and investing and so on. Deflation leads to the economy collapsing while modest inflation leads to economic growth.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Purchasing power is restored when inflation slows down and pay increases to compensate for the increased goods prices.

[–] nerdmanboy@lemmy.fmhy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

Now I just need my pay to increase 😅

[–] kimpilled@infosec.pub 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That would be deflation, which is almost always Very Bad™

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’m not an economist but i would think less than 1% deflation would probably be fine almost indefinitely for the US at this point.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If deflation was 1%, it means the prices of everything is dropping. It means that waiting to buy something means you'll save money, so you wait and don't buy. So they have to drop the price to sell more so they can restock. But then people wait more and buy less. So they start making less. So they need less workers. So they let people to. So people can afford less, so they buy less. So prices drop. So they let people go. Etc etc.

What you are talking about is a recession. It's not favourable to rich or poor, but the poor will suffer more as the rich can afford their basic needs whether there is inflation or deflation.

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You think people will wait indefinitely to buy the things they need because it will be slightly cheaper? If you need an oil change you have to change your oil. Maybe for construction that holds true and a lot of consumer products, but 1% isn’t a big deal for most necessities as they are routine and hard to put off.

[–] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

But like… if the guy making cars can’t sell cars because prices keep dropping now he can’t afford to buy the basics. It’s not a big deal for necessities to drop, but if we experience deflation then things get really bad.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] hark@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Technology is deflationary, but you don't see the tech industry crashing as people wait for steep discounts far exceeding 1% over a couple years or so. Deflation is made out to be a boogeyman because it means the peasants get a pay increase if they keep the same wage unlike the pay cuts they currently receive through inflation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Economics is all opinion so feel free to just voice your own.

[–] vita_man@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Absolutely, prices have come down considerably in the last year. At my local grocery store, the cheapest eggs were about $4.50 for a dozen, now they are $1.99. The price of lumber has also fallen 40%-50% since its high in 2021. Finally, gas prices are about $1 less per gallon compared to a year ago.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Eggs notably weren't up because of inflation, but rather due to chickens dying to a chicken-pandemic.

Rest holds true tho!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jennwiththesea@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anecdotally, as a parent who grocery shops for my family, yes. A few key items that my family goes through have finally dropped to more regular prices. Not pre-pandemic sale prices, but much lower than they have been. Not everything, and some products seem to have changed or disappeared permanently, but I have noticed a difference in our grocery bill.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sir_Kevin@discuss.online 6 points 1 year ago

No, we're just being fucked slightly less than before.

[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

No and that is unfortunately by design. The federal reserve targets 2% inflation as "the ideal." Prices dropping across the board ie negative inflation is called deflation. Deflation can lead to a deflationary spiral where prices drop reducing busines income resulting in layoffs which causes people to spend less causing a drop in income for businesses... The federal reserve attempts to control the money supply (and inflation along with it) through setting interest rates as the lender of last resort for banks. These rates indirectly control how much money is dumped into the banking system and eventually broader economy. The lower the rates the more money enters the system, the higher the rates the less money enters the system. (simplification but good enough for ELI5) However, because the federal reserve can only reduce rates to 0% there is a limit on how much money can be injected into the economy through cheaper lending (government spending is a potential work around for this limitation) so it is seen as being much more of a hazard than runaway inflation as in the latter case, rates can be raised to an arbitrary degree. ie rates are raised until inflation drops.

While reduced inflation is good on its own, there are several indicators that the economy is likely to enter a recession within ~1 year or so. eg. short to medium term givernment bond rates, the general trend of recessions following substantial monetary tightening (higher rates) by the federal reserve etc.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] IrrelevantBoB@feddit.de 26 points 1 year ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Dinodicchellathicc@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't think wages are going to increase to match it anytime soon. I think this economical squeeze is going to be semi permanent

[–] onionbaggage@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

That's been the plan since the 80s.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There's a reason union membership is increasing, and strikes are happening more and more often. That will keep happening until purchasing power is balanced out, or the populace is suppressed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Macaque@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Shrinkflation and reformulation is on the rise.

[–] CrunchyBoy@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've been at my job for six years. I took my salary from six years ago and put it into an inflation calculator and even with all the paltry 2-4% annual raises I've been getting I'm effectively being paid less now than I used to be.

[–] kimpilled@infosec.pub 15 points 1 year ago

The best way to get a raise is to change jobs.

[–] farizer@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago

Screw them and go (if you can). They don't care. Never have

[–] kingthrillgore@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] catreadingabook@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Sure you can!

...Just not one that pays enough for you to afford basic necessities like food and shelter.

Libs: Owned. (/s)

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The average person needs to apply to, on average, the average number applicants to the jobs they are applying for.

If you are applying to jobs that have 10 people on average apply, you need to apply to 10 jobs like that. The internet has made it so the number of average applicants are in the hundreds.

[–] nikt@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is some pretty bad math.

The truly “average” person (i.e. all other things being equal, someone who is consistently in the middle of the pack in terms of skills, experience, fit, etc. relative to other candidates) would have to apply to n/2 (i.e. half) the jobs, where n is the average number of applicants per job.

But in practice the distribution of candidates and where you fall in it tends to bell-curved rather than uniform — there are usually a few very well qualified candidates and a lot of not-so-qualified ones. So job market conditions (scarcity of talent/labour in your particular field, willingness among employers to lower the bar, etc.) can have a much bigger impact on how quickly you find a job than anything else.

In other words, given current job market conditions, telling someone to “just keep applying” is probably not the best advice. Chances are, they’re applying for the wrong jobs, their resume needs improvement, or they need to find some way to stand out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Yewb@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They have changed how they calculated inflation twice in the last 2 years.

[–] varzaman@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] ventrix@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

https://www.marketplace.org/2023/02/14/bls-index-consumer-price-index-formula-calculation/amp/

It doesn't go into detail about how this can be used to affect or manipulate the cpi number but at least it states the fact and the official reasoning

[–] Tygr@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Mortgage rates also improved with the news. Was an exciting day yesterday as a mortgage loan officer. Had lots of great conversations.

[–] vreten@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] ZombieTheZombieCat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was really hoping for inflated cats.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ericlewisauthor@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My bond ETF is still $8K in the hole. Guess I'll just die instead of retire.

[–] kimpilled@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago

It’ll likely stay in the hole unless/until the fed lowers rates again.

load more comments
view more: next ›